意訳をお願いします -8.4.3 Orthogonal Circles A-

意訳をお願いします

8.4.1 Inversion Preserves Angles Between Lines Suppose AB and CD are two lines in the plane that intersect at the point P. If they are inverted in a circle with center O, we will show that the resulting gures make the same angle with each other. The easiest case is if O, the center of　inversion, happens to be the same as P. Since both lines pass through the center　of inversion, they are transformed into themselves so their images trivially have　the same angle between them. If the center of inversion is not on　one of the lines (but it may be on the other), then the line that does not contain　the center will be inverted to a circle passing throughO. Suppose O is not　on AB. Consider the line OX passing throughO that is parallel to AB . Under inversion, OX is transformed transformed into itself (since it passes through the center of inversion), and AB is inverted into a circle K passing through O. Then OX must be tangent to K, since it touches K at O, and if it intersected K in more than one place, OX and AB would intersect, which is impossible since they are parallel. If O is on CD, then CD is inverted to itself, and its angle with OX is clearly unchanged (OX is also inverted into itself). But CD makes the same angle with OX as with AB since they are parallel, so the inverses of AB and CD make the same angle. Finally, if O is on neither line, then both AB and CD are inverted to circles that meet at O, and the lines tangent to those circles at O (OX and OY in the gure) are parallel to the original lines, so they make the same angles as did the original lines.

意訳お願いします；

8.3.5 Inversion with Straightedge and Compass All the results above are theoretical, and can be very useful in constructing a proof, but if you actually have to draw the inverse of a line or a circle, how do you do it? If the result is a line, simply select two points on the line or circle that is to be inverted and invert them as described in Section 8.2. Then connect those two points with a line. If the result is a circle, simply invert three different points, and you will be left with three points that must lie on the required circle. The intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of the segments connecting the points is the center of the required circle. Of course if you are using Geometer, just use the built-in inversion commands: VC=>V Inv, LC=>C Inv and CC=>C Inv. Since both lines and circles usually go to circles, Geometer assumes that the result is always a circle; if the result is a line, what is drawn is effectively an innitely large circle.

意訳をお願いします

8.4 Preservation of Angles Under Inversion When we say that inversion in a circle preserves angles, exactly what is meant? It is clear what is meant by the angle between two lines, but what is the definition of the angle between a line and a circle, or the angle between two circles? The sensible way to define the angle between curves (where a straight line is a special type of curve) is to say that the angle between them is the same as the angle between their tangent lines at the point of intersection. Thus if a pair of circles intersect at a point P and you want to measure the angle between them, construct the tangents to each of the circles at P and measure the angle between those tangent lines. If you have a circle and a line, just nd the tangent to the circle at the point of intersection and measure its angle relative to the line.

英文の意訳をお願いします！ちょっと急いでいます

With that kind of money at stake, it is hardly surprising that industrial-scale technology has caught on. Fishing hooks are on “long-lines” sometimes more than 50 miles in length. Factory ships that can hold 1000 tons of fish store and process the catches. Fishing on such a massive scale can exhaust a fishing ground, but when that happens, the factory ships just move on. The bottom of what is known as the continental slope, between 600 and 6000 feet deep, is home to several species that swim in schools and grow as long as two to three feet. Their presence opened up the continental slope to industrial deep-sea fishing that pays off very well. The usual method, known as bottom trawling, is to drag a huge net, with 15 tons of weight, across the ocean floor, catching everything in its path. What are the environmental costs? No one really knows ------ and that is part of the problem. According to a recent issue of Natural History, catch limits for deep-sea fishes were set “essentially by guessing, relying on knowledge of shallow-water species. They took no account of the far slower birth rate in a typical population of deep-sea fishes.” Two deep-sea species have already been reduced: the orange roughy and the Chilean sea bass. ----------------------------------------------------------- たぶん漁業の話なのですが、最初の方の釣り鉤は～の文と、途中の法律、警察の仕事、厳しい刑罰～あたりの文はなんとなく意味がつかめたのですがそれ以外はさっぱりです・・・大まかな流れだけでもいいので教えてくださると嬉しいです

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

It took a long time to realize―and an even longer time to accept―that the properties of atoms and morecules are not governed by the same physical laws as larege objects. この英文を和訳してほしいです。

和訳お願いします

Differences in cultural values, logic, and thought patterns are often reflected in the very different ways Americans and Japanese organize and present information, ideas, and opinions.These differences lie at the root of many communication problems and exert a powerful influence on the process of of persuation negotiation and conflict resolution. The rules of logic established by the Greeks and Romans are widely accepted in Western cultures, but this Western logic is by no means universal.Logic is a product of culture, and many Asian cultures such as the Japanese operate under different logical assumptions. When Americans get confused and frustrated listening toJapanese, they often complainthat the Japanese "just are't logical" and seem incapable or unwilling to use traditional Western logic. This impression is largely due to cultural differences in reasorning and thought patterns. From an early age, Americans are thought to be orderly in outlining their facts and in summarizing their main points according to framework that reflects Western logical structures.The logical way of presenting ideas in the West could be called linear or "straight-line"logic, which emphasizes direct and explicit communication.The most important aspects of straight-line logic are organizing your presentation in outline form and "getting straight to the point."In general, more low-context mainstream American patterns of thought and presentation are analogous to lines because all parts of the message must be explicity connected clearly and directly. But the Japanese do not learn to order their facts or present information and ideas in the same way.They consider the practice of ordering facts for others comparable to tying a child's shoelaces for him after the child has already learned the skill.American linear, one-step-at-a-time arguments and logic can seem immature to the Japanese, and Western logic is often perceived as instrusive - an attempt to get inside the heads of other people and try to do their thinking for them. But if Americans think in a linear way, then how do Japanese think?A natural response would be that since the circle is the opposite of line, then the Japanese probably think in circles.It is said that the more high-context Japanese prefer to use the logic patterns that emphasize talking "around " the subject rather than on it.The Japanese start at the edges with a wealth of background information and explanations and the n gradually "circle in" on the thesis and main points. However, in some respects, Jappanese patterns of thought and presentation are not like lines at all, but like a series of "dots." Parts of the message are contained in the individual dots, it is up to the audience to link the dots in their heads.In low-context cultures the meaning of communication is stated to the audience directly and all the steps and links are clearly put forth by the speaker verbally.But in high-context cultures the meaning of communication is elicited by the audience indirectly and intuitively - all the steps and links do not have to be clearly put forth verbally.

英文意訳お願いします<(_ _)>急いでいます！

Some people are horrified by the language shortcuts we are talking in this digital age of cellphones, email, blogs, chat rooms, and social websites. Take Professor Jack Moore for example. He wrote, “In the world of text messages, ignorance of grammar and punctuation obviously doesn’t affect a person’s ability to communicate messages such as ‘c u 18r’ (see you later).” Journalist Bill Wales supported Professor Moore’s opinion when he wrote in his weekly column, “When the shortened form of ‘electronic mail’ began appearing in print, the question was whether it should be e-mail or E-mail; the lowercase form has clearly prevailed, although using the uppercase would be an acceptable style decision. My faith in human intelligence still hasn’t recovered from the development that followed: The popular spelling among the general public has become ‘e-mail’ which is an insult to our intelligence.” So, are you also as horrified as Mr. Moore and Mr. Wales about the language shortcuts we are talking in this day and age? With all their shouting and complaining, the people who want to stop this trend are failing to see the truly significant language phenomenon talking place right before their eyes. What we are witnessing may be that, for the first time in the history of language, a communication form has made the writer more important than the reader. Punctuation, as Moore, Wales, and the others point out, was created with the sole purpose of helping the reader clearly and quickly get the writer’s point. The same goes for grammar in general. The same goes for the rules of usage. They help the reader or listener understand. (), the information-age shortcuts now shaping the language are designed primarily for the writer’s convenience ――――― at the reader’s expense. Because it takes a lot of time to scroll through letters on my cell-phone to spell ‘see,’ I just write ‘c.’

Parmenidesについての英文

Parmenides of Elea c. 510–? 440BC ‘One cannot know that which is not –that is impossible’ Little is known of Parmenides’ life and background, and fragments of a poem entitled On Nature are all that survive of his work. Nevertheless, it contains one of the first examples of reasoned argument in which, perhaps as a reaction to Heraclitus, Parmenides attempts to prove that change is impossible and that reality is singular, undivided and homogenous. In the first part of his poem, ‘The Way of Truth’, which was revealed to him, he claims, in meeting with a goddess, Parmenides distinguishes between an inquiry into what is and an inquiry into what is not. The latter, he says, is impossible. ‘One cannot know that which is not –that is impossible –nor utter it; for it is the same thing that can be thought, that is’. The essence of this somewhat cryptic argument is that in order to think of something which is not –let us say, ‘a unicorn’ for example –one must be thinking of something: there must be some idea present to the mind, presumably the idea of a unicorn. But to think of a unicorn means that the unicorn (or the idea of a unicorn) exists in the mind, and therefore it cannot be truly said that unicorns completely fail to exist. The argument turns principally on two complex issues. 冒頭の ‘One cannot know that which is not –that is impossible’ について「人はそれが存在していないことを知ることができない。それは不可能である。」という意味ですか？thatは代名詞、whichは関係代名詞ですか？ ‘One cannot know that which is not –that is impossible –nor utter it; for it is the same thing that can be thought, that is’. について for it is the same thing that can be thought, that is’.のthat isはthat is impossibleですか？最後のit cannot be truly said that unicorns completely fail to exist. について fail toは、～し損なう、という意味だと思うのですが、 fail to existで、「存在し損なう」と訳すと意味が取りにくいです。ここのfail to～はどういう意味合いになるのでしょうか？以下次の英文が続きます。 First, exactly what is meant by ‘exists’ here? What is the difference between existing in the world and existing in the mind? This begins a controversy that will reappear throughout much of the history of philosophy in many different contexts, but most notoriously in Anselm’s ontological argument, some 1500 years later. Second, what are the connections between thoughts, words, and things? If that debate started with Parmenides, it has taxed almost every major thinker ever since, up to and including the seminal works of the twentieth century by philosophers such as Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein and W.V. Quine. よろしくお願いたします。

次の英文を和訳してください。お願いいたします。

英語が苦手で翻訳ができません。どうかよろしくお願いします。訳していただく時に下の語句を参照してください。　The Global Positioning System （GPS） enables anyone with a GPS receiver to determine exactly where they are on the Earth’s surface. It is a miracle for anyone who has ever been lost. It is based on 24 satellites nearly 18,000 kilometers above the Earth’s surface, each orbiting the Earth every 12 hours. 　 The way the system works is perhaps easiest to understand in two dimensions. If you ask someone in Hong Kong how far away from them you are and they say that you are 900 kilometers away, you draw a circle 900 kilometers in radius around Hong Kong and know that you are somewhere on that circle. If someone in Manila then tells you that you are 1,200 kilometers away from them, you draw a circle 1,200 kilometers in radius around Manila. This circle intersects the Hong Kong circle at two points, and you know that you must be at one of those points. If someone in Hanoi then says that you are 700 kilometers away, this third circle will intersect with only one of those two points. And this is where you are: in a boat about 200 kilometers off the coast of Vietnam. 　 The same principle works in three dimensions using four centers and four spheres. Your GPS receiver tells you how far it is from four satellites. If it knows exactly where each satellite is, it can tell you exactly where you are. The orbits of the satellites are very predictable and each GPS receiver has the details of where every satellite should be at any given time. The gravitational pull of the sun and moon can alter an orbit very slightly. These changes are monitored by the U.S. Department of Defense and this information is sent via the satellite to the receiver. The distance between the satellite and the receiver is calculated based on the time the satellite signal takes to reach the receiver. This requires the use of very accurate clocks. 　 By fixing a GPS receiver at one spot on the Earth’s surface and taking repeated readings, scientists can tell if that spot is actually moving. The Tsing Ma Bridge in Hong Kong, one of the world’s longest suspension bridges, is built to move with winds and traffic. But too much movement could seriously damage the bridge. Fourteen permanent GPS receivers are attached to various parts of the bridge to record the vertical and horizontal of each part 10 times a second. In Japan, a grid of more than 1,000 GPS receivers has been set up to monitor small, slow movements of the Earth that could provide early warning of an earthquake. Each receiver receives a signal every 30 seconds and can detect movements of less that one centimeter. 　 The GPS was developed by the U.S. military to guide its missiles and bombers to their targets （and to tell its soldiers where they are）. It is now offered free for civilian use. But the European Union is worried that because the GPS is operated by the U.S. military, there may be a conflict between its military and civilian use at some time in the future. So the EU has decided to develop its own system, to commence operations around 2007, to guarantee uninterrupted use by civilians. 【語句】 Global Positioning System （GPS）「全地球測位システム」 radius 「半球」 Manila 「マニラ」 Hanoi 「ハノイ」 sphere 「球体」　　 details 「詳細」　　 the U.S. Department of Defense 「アメリカの国防総省」　　 Tsing Ma Bridge 「青馬橋」 European Union 「欧州連合（EU）」

この"as-as構文"の意味は何ですか？

Great as are the preoccupations absorbing us at home, concerned as we are with matters that deeply affect our livelihood today and our vision of the future, each of these domestic problems is dwarfed by, and often even created by, this question that involves all humankind. このページからです　http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres54.html これは "we are concerned with matters A to the same extent that we are concerned with B." と同じ意味ですか？

英文和訳

so intimate is the relation between a language and the people who speak it that the two can scarcely be thought of apart. A language lives only so long as there are people who speak it and use it as native tongue, and its greatness is only that given to it by these people. 質問部分最後の部分greatness is only that given to it by these people.のitがなにを示しているのかがわかりません。ちなみに参考書の和訳にはこういった人々によって与えられる偉大さにほかならない。と書かれています。よろしくお願いします

翻訳お願いします。

Were the observer, whether casual or skilled, to reside for some length of time in an asylum, and thus to make himself practically acquainted with the ways, thoughts, and feelings of its inmates, he would certainly discover how great a mistake it is to suppose, as is often done, that they are always so alienated from themselves and from their kind as not to be influenced by the same motives as sane persons [are influenced] in what they do or forbear to do. When an insane person is on his trial for some criminal offence, it is commonly taken for granted by the lawyers that if an ordinary motive for the act, such as anger, revenge, jealousy, or any other passion, can be discovered, there is no ground to allege insanity, or, at any rate, no ground to allege exemption from responsibility by reason of insanity. The ideal madman whom the law creates is supposed to act without motives, or from such motives at it enters not into the mind of a sane person to conceive; and if some one, who is plainly mad to all the world, acts from an ordinary motive in the perpetration of an offence, he is presumed to have acted sanely and with full capacity of responsibility. No greater mistake could well be made. Much of the success of the modern humane treatment of insanity rests upon the recognition of two principles: first, that the insane have like passions with those who are not insane, and are restrained from doing wrong, and constrained to do right, by the same motives which have the same effects in sane persons; secondly, that these motives are only effective within limits, and that beyond these limits they become powerless, the hope of reward being of no avail, and the expectation or infliction of punishment actually provoking more unreason and violence.

翻訳お願いします＞＜

Multiple camera angles are used to deconstruct the space as well as time, so each time we revisit the passage of play, it is the same moment of time presented from a different perpective. It does seem rrather overstating the case to call the slow-motion replay in a spoting event a synchronic deconstruction, and yet it is undeniable that something is happening to our sense of time when these 'sub-texts' are presented. Threre is this compulsion to analyse when we witness the slow motion - we are being told that this is a moment of significance and worthy of closer, slower examination. The telecast itself takes such interruptions and rather than losing the sense of the immediacy of the images actually strengthens that sense. 英語できるかた宜しくおねがいします。

和訳していただけませんか？

下の文を和訳していただけませんか？ To confirm his results, Tschinkel crunched data collected from the NamibRand Nature Reserve. Over the past 10 years, the park has sold fairy circles to ecotourists for about $50 each. The buyers don’t actually get the land; they just adopt it―kind of like people who “purchase” stars. Each circle the reserve sells is marked with the date of sale, and new owners are given the latitude and longitude so they can check up on their purchase on Google Earth.Tschinkel’s friends at the reserve revisited the sold fairy rings and took photos to estimate the amount of regrowth that had occurred over the years. From the number of fairy circles that had died or started to die over the past 2 to 9 years, Tschinkel calculated that the fairy circles had an average age of about 6 decades. “It gives me some confidence that we really are talking about a lifespan of about 30 to 60 years,” he says.Very few researchers have taken the time to investigate the fairy circles, and their work is usually based on opportunistic experiments done on quick trips, Tschinkel says. “There’s no program really focused on trying to figure this out.”Fairy circle aficionados are impressed. “Tschinkel does deliver a superb product for a one-man band,” says Carl Albrecht, the head of research at the Cancer Association of South Africa, who occasionally researches and publishes on the mysterious spots as a hobby. “These are beautiful synergies between Google Earth, satellite photographs, aerial photographs, and actual observations on the ground.”In the future, Tschinkel hopes to return to the region to conduct tests at different times of year, as some of his data indicate that circles tend to form after the rainy season. He acknowledges that he may never get to the bottom of what causes the fairy circles ― and that’s just fine with others. During a recent trip, a local conservationist told Tschinkel that he hopes the fairy circles remain a mystery for years to come. “I certainly can sympathize with that sentiment,” Tschinkel says. “But that doesn’t mean I’ll stop trying to understand.”

英文で訳せないところがあります。

日本語に訳してください。・Such crimes are commited without the obvious use of force, and it is difficult to show that the offender is responsible for the damage caused by the crime. ・The harm caused by these activities is just as real as the harm caused by other types of crimes.

以下の英訳、どこを変えたら良いですか？

（１）私が、祥子と同じ日に産まれた貴方に出会えたことは、偶然とは言いがたいでしょうか。を英訳したいです。機械翻訳にかけると： Is it hard to say that it is accidental that it was able to meet you by whom I was borne on the same day as Shoko? と出るのですが、さらにこれを日本語訳に機械翻訳にかけると、「それが会うことができたことが偶然であると言うことは困難ですか、あなた、それによって私はShokoと同じ日に生まれました?」と出ます。どこをどのように直したらよいでしょうか。同じく（２）知的で冷静で聡明である貴方に、「誕生日おめでとう」と贈ります。を訳したいのですが、機械翻訳では、 It is intellectual, is calm and presents to you who are "wise" with "I congratulate you on the birthday of you." と表示され、さらにそれを日本語訳に直すと、【それは知的で、静かで、あなたに示します、誰がいますか「わかります」で「私はあなたの誕生日にあなたを祝う。」】と出ます。どこをどのように直したらよいか、教えてください。

訳がわかりません。。。お願いします。

訳の回答がなくてわかりません。簡単な訳でいいのでどなたかよろしくお願いします。 Stop for a moment and consider that we spend,on average,86% of our time communicating. For this reason,it is vitally important to have a full understanding of what communication is all about. This means understanding the basic principles that lead to good communication and the breakdown in communication that results when those basic principles are ignored.That is the aim of book. Communication occurs when people send and receive messages.A30-minute speech by a politician,a five-minute talk with a friend, a nod of the head or a wave of the hand are all examples of communication. We can communicate by speaking or by remaining silent. When we consider that communication plays such an extremely important part in our lives, it is perhaps surpring that our schools and colleges are unlikely to train us how to be better communicators. We learn about communication simply by doing it.大変長くてすいません。

itが指すものは？お願いします。

以下の英文は、ある海外のリゾートに泊まった人がそのホテルについて感想を書いたものです。 Oakmont is not a fancy resort, the units are small, and the view from the resort is not that great. It is comfortable and it is convenient to get into and get out of as you travel to the area attractions. This is one of those resorts that you choose because of the location, not the resort amenities. 質問は　it is convenient to get into and get out of as you travel to the area attractions. という文についてです。　最初のitは何を指しているのでしょうか？　単純に形式主語としてto get into and get out of　を指しているのでしょうか？　それともthe hotelのようなものを指しているのでしょうか？（This book is difficult to readのような構文みたいに）

和訳お願いします

和訳お願いします! Market value Market value can only be calculated for publicly-traded companies,but it is very easy to measure. Simply take today's share value,as listed on the stock market,and multiply it by the number of shares outstanding. The result is a measure of what the company's investors believe the company is worth. A problem with market value is that it reflects not just facts and analysis of the company's value,but also investors' emotions. When overall share prices are falling,investors tend to panic and sell their shares as well,forcing down a company's share price for reasons that have nothing to do with the company. Share prices are often artificially increased for similar reasons. So the advantages of market value are that it is easy to calculate and usually provides a good,objective measure of what the company's shareholders think it is worth. Disadvantages are that it may only be calculated for publicly-held companies,and that companies' shares may be undervalued or overvalued for emotional reasons. よろしくお願いします。

和訳をお願いいたしますm(_ _)m

和訳をよろしくお願いします！ On November 15 a festival is held for children seven （siti）five(go) and three(san) years old, and so the festival is called shichi-go-san. The reason why we have a celebration for these years is because odd numbers are believed to be lucky since they cannot be divided by two. In addition, we are told that since the ages of 7, 5 and 3 years are important growth steps for children, it is, therefore, significant to honor the children of these ages. In many parts of Japan, a child is received as a member of a shrine parts when he or she is seven. Though the are variations according to locality, in general, boys who are three and five and girls who are three and seven are dressed in their best clothes, and are taken by their parents to large and prestigious shrines, and very often A to the shrines of their local deities. It is customary after the visit to buy chitose-ame(thousand-year candy), sold at the stalls on the grounds of the shrine. よろしくお願いしますm(_ _)m

意訳をお願いします

みんなの回答

関連するQ&A

意訳をお願いします

意訳お願いします；

意訳をお願いします

日本史の転換点？：赤穂浪士、池田屋事件、禁門の変に見る武士の忠義と正義

英文の意訳をお願いします！ちょっと急いでいます

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

和訳お願いします

英文意訳お願いします<(_ _)>急いでいます！

Parmenidesについての英文

次の英文を和訳してください。お願いいたします。

この"as-as構文"の意味は何ですか？

英文和訳

翻訳お願いします。

翻訳お願いします＞＜

和訳していただけませんか？

英文で訳せないところがあります。

以下の英訳、どこを変えたら良いですか？

訳がわかりません。。。お願いします。

itが指すものは？お願いします。

和訳お願いします

和訳をお願いいたしますm(_ _)m

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ
一覧

専門家に質問してみよう
専門家登録

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVE セレクト

意訳をお願いします

みんなの回答

関連するQ&A

意訳をお願いします

意訳お願いします；

意訳をお願いします

日本史の転換点？：赤穂浪士、池田屋事件、禁門の変に見る武士の忠義と正義

英文の意訳をお願いします！ちょっと急いでいます

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

和訳お願いします

英文意訳お願いします<(_ _)>急いでいます！

Parmenidesについての英文

次の英文を和訳してください。お願いいたします。

この"as-as構文"の意味は何ですか？

英文和訳

翻訳お願いします。

翻訳お願いします＞＜

和訳していただけませんか？

英文で訳せないところがあります。

以下の英訳、どこを変えたら良いですか？

訳がわかりません。。。お願いします。

itが指すものは？お願いします。

和訳お願いします

和訳をお願いいたしますm(_ _)m

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ 一覧

専門家に質問してみよう 専門家登録

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVE セレクト

カテゴリ
一覧

専門家に質問してみよう
専門家登録