• ベストアンサー
※ ChatGPTを利用し、要約された質問です(原文:英語です。)

Is it Wicked to Work a Regular Job?

このQ&Aのポイント
  • Is it wicked to engage in a regular job when you already have enough to live on? This question arises when one is accused of taking the bread out of other people's mouths.
  • In this context, the word 'whenever' is used as a subordinating conjunction, indicating that the situation described in the sentence occurs every time a person who already has enough to live on proposes to engage in a regular job.
  • The word 'enough' in the sentence refers to having an adequate or sufficient amount of something, in this case, enough resources or money to sustain one's livelihood without the need for additional income.

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • Nakay702
  • ベストアンサー率80% (9956/12439)
回答No.1

>この文の、Whenever が、副詞なのか接続詞なのか知りたいです。 ⇒あ、前回間違えたかもしれません。「副詞節を導く接続詞」ですね。 >また、enoughも何なのか知りたいです。 ⇒これも副詞としましたが、「不定代名詞」と考えた方がいいかも知れません。

eigo0123
質問者

お礼

ありがとうございます。 後で自分で解いた時に分からないところが出てきてしまって💦 本当にいつもありがとうございます。

すると、全ての回答が全文表示されます。

関連するQ&A

  • 構文分析よろしくお願い致します。

    Whenever a person who already has enough to live on proposes to engage in some everyday kind of job,such as school-teaching or typing, he or she is told that such conduct takes the bread out of other people's mouths,and is therefore wicked. If this argument were valid,it would only be necessary for us all to be idle in order that we should all have our mouths full of bread. What people who say such things forget is that what a man earns he usually spends, and in spending he gives employment. この文の構文分析をお願いしたいです。 丁寧にしていただけると嬉しいです。 よろしくお願い致します🙏

  • 丁寧に解説して欲しいです。

    Whenever a person who already has enough to live on proposes to engage in some everyday kind of job,such as school-teaching or typing, he or she is told that such conduct takes the bread out of other people's mouths,and is therefore wicked. If this argument were valid,it would only be necessary for us all to be idle in order that we should all have our mouths full of bread. What people who say such things forget is that what a man earns he usually spends, and in spending he gives employment. この文がどのような訳になるかと、それぞれの単語の意味と品詞を応えていただけると嬉しいです。簡単なものは省いて頂いても大丈夫です。 よろしくお願い致します!

  • 和訳をお願いします!

    1 I'm that hungry I could eat shoe leather. 2 The press attached no small importance the present state of our country. 英訳をお願いします! 3 少年は旧友みんなと絶交した。 4 乗客の中には救助された人もいるが、おぼれ た人もいた。 和訳()に注意して Whenever a person who already has enough to live on proposes to engage in some everyday kind of job, (such as) school-teacher or typing, he or she is told that such conduct takes the bread out of other people's mouth, and is therefore wicked. 宜しくお願いします!

  • 英語の和訳です。お願いします!!

    For example, one of the major differences between the American educational system and systems in a majority of other countries is that education in the United States is intended for everyone-not just for a privileged few. Schools are expected to meet the needs of every child,regardless of his or her ability,and also the needs of society itself. This means that tax-supported public schools offer more than academic subjects. It surprises many people when they come here to find high schools offering such courses as typing, sewing, radio repair, computer programming, or driver training, along with traditional academic subjects such as mathematics,history, and language. Students can choose among a great variety of subjects depending on their interests, future plans, and level of ability. The primary purposes of American education are to develop every child's abilities, however great or small these may be, and to give each child a sense of citizenship.

  • 議決権の英語3ケースについて

    (1) Voting power which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, such security; and/or, (2) Investment power which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, such security. 以上の英文でVoting power ,power to vote,direct the votingの3つ全てが議決権を意味しているように思われるのですが,3者間に違いはあるのでしょうか?

  • 英語が得意な方この問題の解説をお願いします。

    He is ( )vote for such a dishonest candidate in the election. という英文の(  )になぜ、(1)と(2)をいれたら誤りなのか理由を説明せよ。という問題です。 (1)enough intelligent not to (2)not enough intelligent なぜ(1)と(2)では、あやまりなのか、一つ一つ偏差値30でもわかるように解説していただければありがたいです。

  • 英語

    1Tom said that his room wasn't (enough,more than,have,to,big) five people in it at one time. 2Jack always reads some books or other (to,as,behind,to be,not) the times. 3(the peace,when,the world,be,is,there,no,telling,may,of)threatened. 4It (goes,saying,are,that love,without,and trust) of vital importance in life. 5(denying,is,conditions,no,people surrounding,there,that,young) are formidably harsh. 6Unless you're going to use it regularly, (an expensive dictionary,buying,it's,such,no use). 7In (habitable,Mars,to,more,order,make) to life, the temperature of the planet must increase. 8(adult/into/a person/order/to/a mature, responsible/in/develop/for), he or she needs to experience life firsthand. 9By the late 1950s scientists had already accumulated (between,a clear,evidence,link,enough,show,to) smoking and cancer. 10I always encourage my students to be individual and to think themselves, but I (help,thinking,do,listen,cannot,that,not,they) to what I say. 1、6、7には訳をつけて頂きたいです。 お願いいたします。

  • QA53

    QA53 ……この英文はどう訳せばよいでしょうか c) The third part is occupied with miscellaneous precepts relating mostly to actions of domestic and everyday life and conduct which have little or no connection with one another. 第三の断章はほとんど家庭内での振る舞いと毎日の過ごし方に関した雑多な教訓が占めて、ほとんどお互いに関係のない指導事項である。 質問 (1)actions of domestic and every lifeについて   この文はactions of domestic and actions of every lifeという解釈で   よいでしょうか (2)conductは動詞か名詞か。   動詞なら、主語がpreceptsで、which文は完全に名詞句になる。   whichが関係詞ならconductは名詞となるが、複数でなくてもよいの   でしょうか。   もし、名詞なら、relating A and B and Cとなって、意味  が矛盾します。   ここがわからない。 (3)and conduct ……について   conductは名詞で、主語と動詞が略されたものだろうか   “ほとんど相互の関係がない指導事項です”    この解釈で良いでしょうか。

  • 英語の一文の文構造を教えて下さい。

    タイトルの件お願いします。 以下の英文の大意はつかめるものの、 最後の”is free of such possession”がどこに係るV,Cなのか掴めないため、 その点、教えていただけると非常に助かります。 (is free の前にthat itが省略…?とも考えましたがそれでもよく分かりませんでした…) 【本文】 The restrictions in this Agreement on the use and/or disclosure of Confidential Information shall not apply to any portion of the Confidential Information which the Disclosing Party agrees in writing is free of such restrictions. 以上、大変お手数かとは思いますが、宜しくお願いします。

  • 英語の和訳なのですが、、、

    Have you ever stopped to wonder about things, especially something new? Most people are blessed with the gift of curiosity. We like to discuss our views of how such-and-such works or how such-and-such happend. という文なのですが ラストの一文,We like ~のところがうまく訳せないので 教えていただきたいです。お願いします。

プロポーズ無しの結婚
このQ&Aのポイント
  • プロポーズ無しの結婚について考える
  • 結婚相手との問題について
  • プロポーズの意味とは?
回答を見る

専門家に質問してみよう