仮定法の書き換え文 合っているかみてもらえますか。
(1)Were I as rich as he (＝If I were as rich as he), I would travel abroad.
（彼ぐらいの金があれば海外旅行でもするのだが）
(1)書き換え1⇒Being as rich as he, I would travel abroad.
(2) If it were not for your quick play, our team would not win.
「君の素速いプレーがなければ、私たちのチームは勝たないだろう」
(2)書き換え1⇒If our team doesn’t have your quick play, we will not win.
↑もしかしたらwe will not win tomorrow.とかなったら仮定法現在でもいけるのでは？
勝てる可能性が増えてしまう？違う意味になるのかな？
(2)書き換え２⇒If our team didn't have your quick play, we would not win.
↑(2)が仮定法（過去形つかう分）で書かれているので、正しいのはやはり書き換え２になるのかな？●やはり「～がなければ」はit be動詞 not for 名詞 でないとだめでしょうか？
(3)With your advice, the project would have succeeded.
「君のアドバイスがあったら計画は成功しだだろう」
(3)書き換え文1⇒If it had been for your advice, the project would’ve succeeded.
(3)書き換え文2⇒If we had gotten your advice, the project would ‘ve succeeded.
(4)A true friend would not betray you. (本当の友達ならあなたを裏切らないだろうに)
=If you were a true friend, A true friend(he) would not betray you.
(4)書き換え文1⇒Being a true friend, he wouldn’t betray you.
(5)With a little more time, I could have solved the problem.
(もう少し時間があれば、その問題を解けたのに)
(5)書き換え文1⇒If I had had a little more time, I could ‘ve solved the problem.
(5)書き換え文2⇒If I had a little more time, I could have solved the problem.
●(5)の場合書き換え文1と2では、どちらが正しいのでしょう？
(5)書き換え文3⇒A little more time could’ve led me to solve the problem.
(6) I would have forgiven him. 「私だったら彼を許したでしょう。」
(6)書き換え文1⇒If I had been you, I would’ve forgiven him.
(7)I don't know his address; otherwise I would write to him.
彼の住所を知りません。 さもなければ手紙を書くでしょう。
(7)書き換え文1⇒ I don’t know his address. If I knew his address, I would write to him.
すみません、多いですが、以上です。よろしくお願いいたします。
お礼
倒置という説明でピンと来ました。So did I. Neither am I.などと同じ仕組みですね。 過去形の質問に対して未来形の倒置で答えているのでちょっと迷いがありました。 neitherはどちらも～ないという便利な言葉ですが、日本語にはない表現なのでつい頭で考えてしまいます。どうもありがとうございました。