Real Reality: The Power of Imagination

このQ&Aのポイント
  • Real reality is the manifestation of our own mind, encompassing both positive and negative aspects.
  • It exerts control over the lower reality, the material world, by creating and destroying at will.
  • Children's toys, regardless of their cost, hold immense value as they serve as gateways to their own imagined worlds.
回答を見る
  • ベストアンサー

英文の和訳をお願いしますm(__)m

質問よろしくお願いします。 以下の英文になりますが もし分かる方がおりましたら ぜひご教授くださいm(__)m 訳出の中心となる real reality の本文に即したぴったりな訳がなかなか思いつかず苦労しています。 【問】空所に入る適当なものを選び、全文を訳しなさい Real reality is entirely of the mind. It is partly good and partly evil. But it keeps the lower reality ー that mere collection of matter and material forces ー under its control. It creates and it destroys this lower reality at its own pleasure. This is why it is only common people who give their children expensive toys. To a real child anything will serve as a toy. Cheap toys do no harm;and they give these unique immense pleasure. But it is always their old toys,however cheap,that children cling to. Why? Because they are no longer simple toys. They have become the mediums,the bridges,the ladders,the magic carpets,by which they enter the kingdom of heaven;enter,in other words,the rainbow land of their own ( ). (1) imagination (2) civilization (3) imitation (4) reaction 以上になります。 重ね重ねになりますが どうぞよろしくお願いします。

  • 英語
  • 回答数1
  • ありがとう数0

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • bakansky
  • ベストアンサー率48% (3502/7245)
回答No.1

> Real reality is entirely of the mind.  現実認識というのは心理的な次元の問題だ。 > It is partly good and partly evil.  それは良くもあれば悪くもある。 > But it keeps the lower reality ー that mere collection of matter and material forces ー under its control.  それは低次元の認識 -- 単なる事物の集積や物質的な力 -- に支配される。 > It creates and it destroys this lower reality at its own pleasure.  それはこの低次の現実を思うがままに創造もし破壊しもする。 > This is why it is only common people who give their children expensive toys.  自分の子供たちに高価な玩具を与えるのは、せいぜいが平凡な人たちであるのは、そういう理由からだ。 > To a real child anything will serve as a toy.  子供にとっては何でも玩具になる。 > Cheap toys do no harm; and they give these unique immense pleasure.  安物の玩具でも十分なのだ。そういったものでも独特な大きな喜びをもたらす。 > But it is always their old toys, however cheap, that children cling to.  そして子どもたちが執着するのは、それが安物であれ、使い慣れた玩具だ。 > Why? Because they are no longer simple toys.  何故かといえば、それらはもはや単なる玩具ではないからだ。 > They have become the mediums, the bridges, the ladders, the magic carpets, by which they enter the kingdom of heaven; enter, in other words, the rainbow land of their own ( ).  それらは媒介物であり、橋渡しするものであり、梯子であり、魔法の絨毯となっているのだ。それらによって子どもは天国に入る。言いかえれば、彼らの想像の中で虹の国に入るのだ。

関連するQ&A

  • 英文の和訳をおねがいします。

    It is salutary to realize the fundamental isolation of the individual mind. We have no certain knowledge of any consciousness but our own. We can only know the world through our own personality. Because the behaviour of others is similar to our own, we suppose that they are like us; it is a shock to discover that they are not. As i grow older I am more and more amazed to discover how great are the differences between one man and another. I am not far from believing that everyone is unique.

  • 英文和訳ですが全然わかりません^^;

    Popular culture focuses on flying cars’ glittering image and carefully sidesteps their complex realities. It treats them as the highest of high technology, symbols of technology’s power to improve everyday life. Unlike other symbols of the high-tech future―robots, smart houses, and intelligent computers―flying cars are never shown breaking down, much less developing malevolent agendas of their own. They are as reliable and easy to use as a telephone or refrigerator is in our world and, in stories set in the future, as familiar and unremarkable to their users. sidesteps (問題などを)避ける smart houses スマートハウス flying cars are never shown breaking down, much less developing malevolent agendas of their own 空飛ぶ車は故障している状態や、ましてそれ自体悪意を持ってしまうように描かれることはまずない ご協力お願いします

  • 英文の和訳2

    If I don't like living here,I will soon leave andeither go back to my own country of find another country where I can be more comfortable. It is true that some foreigners come to Japan to live but find that,after a short while, they don't like it and so decide to leave. But it seems to me that these people are few and the causes for their unhappiness in Japan are usually to be found in their own characters and not Japan itself. 和訳をお願いします>< この英文の前にも文章がありますが、hereは「ここ」などと訳してもらって構いませんので。

  • この英文を和訳して欲しいです。

    Gerontology is defined as the science of aging. Actually it is made up of the knowledge about aging derived from many sciences, including biology, psychology, and sociology. Gerontologists are the scientists who study aging. Gerontologists have been accused of focusing only on the declines of aging, and of assuming that the characteristics of the aged are the primary causes of the problems of elders. Such a focus on declines is a subtle form of ageism because it ignores the possibilities of growth and improvement with age. The assumption that the characteristics of elders are the cause of the problems of elders is another subtle from of ageism, because it ignores the extent to which the ageism embedded in our social structure and culture contribute to the problems of elders. The extent to which various theories in gerontology may contribute to ageism is discussed in Chapter 6. Geriatrics is the study of the medical aspects of old age, and the application of gerontology to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of illness among older persons. Thus, while gerontology deals with all aspects of aging, geriatrics is limited to the medical aspects. Physicians may be subject to several kinds of ageism. Because they focus on illness and disability, they may forget that health and ability is normal among elders. They may be tempted to blame any difficult or obscure illness on old age and assume that nothing can be done about it. Geriatricians and other providers of service to elders may exaggerate age differences and needs of elders in order to promote their own service roles. Several gerontologists charge that gerontology is becoming increasingly "biomedicalized" and that this produces a negative view of aging. Kalish suggested that there is a "new ageism" found especially among advocates and service providers for the aged. It stereotypes the "elderly" in terms of the characteristics of the least capable, least healthy, and least alert of the elderly. It perceives the older person as, in effect, a relatively helpless and dependent individual who requires the support services of agencies and other organizations. It encourages the development of services without adequate concern as to whether the outcome of these services contributes to reduction of freedom for the participants to make decisions controlling their own lives. It produces an unrelenting stream of criticism against society in general and certain individuals in society for the mistreatment of the elderly, emphasizing the unpleasant existence faced by the elderly.

  • この英文はどのように訳せば良いのでしょう?

    この英文はどのように訳せば良いのでしょうか? 特に”nature of ~”の解釈がよく解らないのですが。 What is the nature of their claim? and, What is the total amount of their claim? if they mentioned it to you. 初歩的な質問かもしれませんが、どなたかご教授下さい。

  • 英文の添削お願いします。

    課題文:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people should start to live on their own and become indepentent of their parents as early as possible.Give reasons to support your opinion. 解答: (1)I think young people should start to live on their own and become independent of their parents as early as possible. (2)I think so because,when they start working they will have to do everything by theirselves.Their parents won't help them any more.If they are not independent of their parents,they cannot work. (3)Second, if they start to live on their own,they will know that doing houseworks such as making meals,cleaning rooms is hard work. (4)And the most important reason is that,when they have their children,they have to teach their children a lot of things by them selves.If they are not indepentent of their parents,they can't raise their children properly. (5)I have friends who live on their own.They are doing everything by theirselves,so they look confident. (6)With above reasons I think young peole should start to live on their own and becomeindependent of their parents.約150words,30分 TOEFL対策の問題です。 後々読み直してみると、 firstがないのにsecondを使ったり、 一番大事な理由を述べているパラグラフの位置が中途半端だったり、 無駄にパラグラフを多くしてしまった点がよくなかったように思います。 文章構成・表現・文法なんでも稚拙な部分が多くあると思うので直したほうがよい所やアドバイスがあったらぜひ教えてください。 よろしくお願いします。

  • 英文の和訳

    英文の和訳をしていただけるかた のみで、お願いできますでしょうか? においについて?みたいな感じです・・。 どうぞよろしくお願いいたします。 Every one has a distinctive individual odour, but it is often so subtle that we do not smell it. It is harder still to describe in words. Your soul mate washes frequently, and his odious and fragrance will not be strong, but the subtle nuances of them are a warmth, like cloth. He smells of shampoo, and faintly fragrant and like hair styling products, and there is a subtle undertone of oiliness, cooking oils and toasted and fried things. soap, faintly of burnt things, and tomatoes and cheese or pizza, There is a fragrance of mingled things,. These odours are so faint you hardly smell them, you more feel it, you know when he is there, like the difference between him and an empty space, but the subtle difference in air is uniquely his own. The strongest parts for detecting this smell are the region of his hair and collar.. The cloth and cooking smell is the undertone, the lower note or less pleasant background of his perfume. and the shampoo and hair styling products, stronger like a cloaking smell but they are both so fine and subtle that it is hard to detect these things

  • 和訳をお願いします。

    Pericles' Funeral Oration 431 BC: "...In the fighting, they thought it more honourable to stand their ground and suffer death than to give in and save their lives. So they fled from the reproaches of men, abiding with life and limb the brunt of battle, and in a small moment of time, the climax of their lives, a culmination of glory, not of fear, were swept away from us." 後半が分かりません。 よろしくお願い致します。

  • 英文和訳

    And should we defeat every enemy, and should we double our wealth and conquer the stars, and still be unequal to this issue, then we will have failed as a people and as a nation. For, with a country as with a person, "what is a man profited if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?" There is no Negro problem. There is no Southern problem. There is no Northern problem. There is only an American problem.This was the first nation in the history of the world to be founded with a purpose. The great phrases of that purpose still sound in every American heart, North and South: "All men are created equal." "Government by consent of the governed." "Give me liberty or give me death." And those are not just clever words, and those are not just empty theories. In their name Americans have fought and died for two centuries and tonight around the world they stand there as guardians of our liberty risking their lives. Those words are promised to every citizen that he shall share in the dignity of man. This dignity cannot be found in a man's possessions. It cannot be found in his power or in his position. It really rests on his right to be treated as a man equal in opportunity to all others. It says that he shall share in freedom. He shall choose his leaders, educate his children, provide for his family according to his ability and his merits as a human being. To apply any other test, to deny a man his hopes because of his color or race or his religion or the place of his birth is not only to do injustice, it is to deny Americans and to dishonor the dead who gave their lives for American freedom. どなたかお願いします。

  • ロムニーの演説の和訳をお願いします!

    Every new college graduate thought they'd have a good job by now. A place for their own. They could start paying back some of their loans and build for the future. This is what our nation was supposed to start paying down the national debt, and rolling back massive deficits. This was the hope and change America voted for. It is not just what we wanted, it is not just what we expected, it is what Americans deserved.