- ベストアンサー
技術英文の訳ですが、
chickenteriyakiの回答
- chickenteriyaki
- ベストアンサー率27% (27/100)
私がはてなと思った後で、念のために身の周りのインテリネーティブ3人に、正月に集まったとき、聞いてみたんですね。1人目は脳医学博士、2人目は超有名な英語辞書の編集員、3人目は有名新聞の記者。全員が私と同じ意見で、言いたい事はわかるけど、変な英語だよねweird. very weird.と言っていましたので、やっぱりこの英語は変だと思います。
関連するQ&A
- 英文の訳
The terminology often used in software engineering can be imprecise and misleading. Many software practitioners and researchers mistakenly think that to be meaningful, a measure must be useful, practical, worthwhile, or easy to collect. These characteristics are not part of meaningfulness. Indeed, such issues are difficult to address for any measure, whether it occurs in software or in some other scientific discipline. For example, carbon-dating techniques for measuring the age of fossils may not be practical or easy to do, but the measures are certainly valid and meaningful! Thus, meaningfulness should be viewed as only one attribute of a measure. 長いですが、どなたか訳してもらえないでしょうか？宜しくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- or の使い方と訳について。
there aren't really any ghosts.Or are there? という文を 「ゴーストなんて本当はいないんだよ。それとも、いるのかな？」 と訳してみました。 でもなんとなく腑に落ちないし、ここでのorの使い方がよくわかりません。 否定文の次に来ているので、そういう使い方があるのは知っていますが、この文の場合、当てはまらないような気がしました。 訳が正しいのか、それと、orのここでの役割を、どなたか教えていただけないでしょうか？
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文和訳 解説をお願いします。
The residents are not expected to return for good any time soon. The residents は福島原発で避難命令を受けた人を指しています。for good any time soonの訳がよくわかりませんでした。よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文契約書の訳が分かりません。
英文契約書の訳が分かりません。 契約書に使用される英文を勉強しています。 そこで例文でわからない表現があるので、ご教授していただきたいです。 例文は以下です。 Article 20 (FORCE MAJEURE) Neither party shall be liable to the other party for any loss or damages due to any cause beyond the reasonable control of the party, including but not limited to strike, insurrection, change of law, war, or similar events which the contracting parties are unable to prevent or neutralize despite the required care and adequate expenses. 不可抗力についての文章ですが、最後の「despite the required care and adequate expenses.」という表現がよく分かりません。 何方かご教授して頂けませんでしょうか。 宜しくお願い致します。 m(_ _)m
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文訳があります。訳は正しいですか？
Although Westerners dislike being asked questions of affiliation ("What group do you belong to?"), t hey ask many questions involving opinion and choice. It is considered presumptuous and rude to make decisions for other people, even for seemingly minor things like choice of drink or dressing, since it would be considered an infringment on the other person's independence. It is even worse to make arrangements for a meal or an outing without consulting the person concerned. As a result, people who are reluctant to express their opinion or preference are considered not to have any and are thus looked down on as wishy-washy or even stupid. 日本語訳 西洋人は所属（どのグループに自分が入っているか）について聞かれることを嫌うけれども、彼らは意見や選択については、たくさん質問をする。他人のために意思決定をすることはたとえ、それが飲み物やドレッシングを選ぶことのような小さなことであったとしても、 自立した個としての相手の侵害することになるであろうと考えられているので、あつかましくて失礼なことと考えられている。 その人の意見も聞かずに、食事や外出の計画をすることはもっと良くないことである。その結果、自分の意見や好みを言うことを嫌がる人は、意見や好みを持っていないと考えられ、したがって、 決断力のない人間かもしくは愚か者であると見下されるのである。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の訳が分かりません
英文の訳が分かりません The thing that he was about to do was to open a diary. this was not illegal (nothing was illegal, since there were no longer any laws ), but if detected it was reasonably certain that it would be punished by death, or at least by twenty-five years in a forced-labour camp. Winston fitted a nib into the penholder and sucked it to get the grease off. The pen was an archaic instrument, seldom used even for signatures, and he had procured one,furtively and with some difficulty, simply because of a feeling that the beautiful creamy paper deserved to be written on with a real nib instead of being scratched with an ink-pencil. Actually he was not used to writing by hand. Apart from very short notes, it was usual to dictate everything into the speak-write, which was of course impossible for his present purpose. He dipped the pen into the ink and then faltered for just a second. A tremor had gone through his bowels. To mark the paper was the decisive act. In small clumsy letters he wrote April 4th, 1984 この英文を全訳してもらえるとありがたいです
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文訳お願いします！
When automobiles first began to appear on the roads and streets of this country they did not have horns of any kind. The noise they made and the moderate speed at which they went made horns unnecessary. But in time it was felt that a warning device was needed. The first such signal was a hand-operated horn consisting of a rubber bulb on one end of a brass trumpet. In 1908 an inventor secured a patent on a horn that was electrically operated. He coined Klaxon as the trade-mark for his new product, and this word has now become popular. Klaxon is based upon the Creek verb klazein, which is related to the Latin word clangere from which "clang" comes. The Greek verb means to make a sound of some kind, its precise meaning depending on the source of the sound. When birds are referred to, it means "to scream," as the eagles and herons do. When dogs are the source of the sound, it means "to bark or bay." If things such arrows in a quiver are being talked of, klazein means "to clash or rattle." If the wind is spoken of, it means "to whistle." If people are referred to, the verb means "to shout or scream." It would be difficult to coin a word that has in it more of the element of sound than does Klaxon.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 至急この英文の訳をお願いします
至急この英文の訳をお願いします Let's hear from someone else,Kirk? I am concerned about children who are too busy with piano lessons,ballet classes,tennis practice,after-school study programs, ets. Arts and sports are important,but in my opinion,all these activities put too much focus on self-improvement. The focusin on how many skills you can gain or how much you can improve-yourself. What about doing something for others? What can you do to contribute to society? Everyone should be involed in the world we live in.Agood strting point for young people may be helping their families. By doing household chores,children can learn the importance of helping others every day. They can also learn about the responsibilities they must bear as adults. Aren't these more important? That is an interesting observation. .
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の訳のとり方を教えてください。
The fact that our taste is culturally determined is something of which we have to be aware, and this crops up throughout this book. Here, though, it is important to think about the social dimension of taste as having more to do with art as a process of social exclusion--we are meant to feel intimidated if we don't know who the artist is, or worse still if we don't feel emotionally moved through the 'exquisiteness' of the work. We have all read or heard the unmistakable utterances of these connoisseurs. But luckily their world does not belong to art history. この英文の二番目のセンテンスのas～asの個所がよくわからないのですが、 as～as・・・で、「・・・のように～」もしくは「・・・と同様～」と意味をとるのでしょうか？ a process of social exclusion 社会的な排斥の過程？ having more to do with art 芸術を用いてもっとすることを持つ? この二つをつなげて it is important to think about the social dimension of taste as having more to do with art as a process of social exclusionを訳すと "社会的な排斥の過程（工程？）と同様に芸術を用いてもっとすることを持っている観賞力の社会的重要性について考えることは重要である"、ですか？ 意味が掴めない感じです。 また、 we are meant to feel intimidated if we don't know who the artist is, or worse still if we don't feel emotionally moved through the 'exquisiteness' of the work.について "私たちはもしその芸術家が誰なのか知らなかったり、さらにもっと悪いことにその作品の洗練されたものを通して情緒的に駆り立てられないならばぞっとすることになっている" と訳したのですが are meant to feel intimidated はbe meant to doで、～することになっている、ですか？ ぞっとすることになっている、という訳がしっくりこない感じなのですが。 以下は前文になります。 Another aspect of connoisseurship is its relationship to our understanding of taste. A connoisseur's taste in relation to art is considered to be refined and discriminating. Our concept of taste in relation to art is quite complicated, and inevitably it is bound up in our ideas about social class. Let me take a little time to explore this more fully. I have already discussed the practice of art appreciation--art available for all and seen and enjoyed by all. By contrast, connoisseurship imposes a kind of hierarchy of taste. The meaning of taste here is a combination of two definitions of the word: our faculty of making discerning judgements in aesthetic matters, and our sense of what is proper and socially acceptable. But by these definitions taste is both culturally and socially determined , so that what is considered aesthetically 'good' and socially 'acceptable' differs from one culture or society to another. 『ART HISTORY--Connoisseurship』:Dana Arnold
- ベストアンサー
- 英語