• ベストアンサー

it or one ?

arasiinhfranの回答

回答No.6

この場合は、IT でもone でも入れられると思います 私は、文章的にitかと思いました

mesenfants
質問者

お礼

ありがとうございます。 貴重な意見ですに感謝します。 「文章的」に「one」ともいえるから困ります。

関連するQ&A

  • one と it とどちらが適切なのでしょうか?

    How much is that jacket in the window? You mean the blue jacket? Yes, the longer one. It’s $55. Do you have it in medium? の代名詞はit かoneどちらが正しいのでしょうか? また、説明もいただければ嬉しいです。 よろしくお願いいたします。

  • whether it be ... or ...

    In all of life, there are sequential stages of growth and development. A child learns to turn over, to sit up, to crawl, and then to walk and run. Each step is important and each one takes time. No step can be skipped. This is true in all phases of life, in all areas of development, whether it be learning to play the piano or communicate effectively with a workng associate. 生活の全ての段階で、成長の全ての領域で、これは真実である、 それが ピアノを弾く 又は 仕事の同僚と効果的に連絡を取る 事を学ぶ事であるにしろ。 直訳するとこうなると思うのですが、なぜwhether itの後ろがbe(原形)になっているのですか? なぜ is ではないのでしょうか。 あと、直訳で間違っている所が御座いましたらご指摘下さい。 お願い致します。

  • most out of it by putting

    アメリカの成功哲学についての書籍で、 以下のような文章があります。 You, who read this book, will get most out of it by putting into practice the Master Mind principle described in the book. ※Master Mindというのは固有名詞的なもので、 「チームワーク」みたいなものだと思って頂ければよいです。 チームワークの大切さについて語られています。 意味としては、 この本に記されている マスターマインド(チームワーク)の 原則を読んだあなたは…… という感じになると思いますが、 get most out of it by putting の意味がいまひとつわかりません。 アドバイス頂けませんでしょうか。 前後の文脈としては When they had problems to be solved they sat down together and talked freely until they discovered, from their joint contribution of ideas, a plan that would serve their purpose. You, who read this book, will get most out of it by putting into practice the Master Mind principle described in the book. This you can do (as others are doing so successfully) by forming a study club, consisting of any desired number of people who are friendly and harmonious. です。 ご教授よろしくお願い致します。

  • 代名詞の使い方(it, them, one...)

    前に出てきた名詞を言い換えるとき、it, them, oneなどの代名詞を使うと思うのですが、これはどう使い分けるのでしょうか?たくさんの言い換えの方法や法則、単語などがありましたら、ぜひ教えてください。 A:I have to fill two forms out. Do you have it? B:I have both of them. They are copied already. この会話は変ではないでしょうか?

  • itが指すものは?お願いします。

    以下の英文は、ある海外のリゾートに泊まった人がそのホテルについて感想を書いたものです。 Oakmont is not a fancy resort, the units are small, and the view from the resort is not that great. It is comfortable and it is convenient to get into and get out of as you travel to the area attractions. This is one of those resorts that you choose because of the location, not the resort amenities. 質問は it is convenient to get into and get out of as you travel to the area attractions. という文についてです。 最初のitは何を指しているのでしょうか? 単純に形式主語としてto get into and get out of を指しているのでしょうか? それともthe hotelのようなものを指しているのでしょうか?(This book is difficult to readのような構文みたいに)

  • one or the otherは熟語?

    one or the otherと入っている文章の意味がどうしてもつかめません。 その文は以下の(出てくるまで長いのですが)、一番最後のセンテンスにあります。 The melting pot metaphor became very common in the late 18th century, in the late 1700’s in the United States, and is still used today. It became especially popular in the 1970’s when the United States, having changed its immigration policy in the mid 1960’s, started to receive, again, a very large number of immigrants. The United States always had immigrants up to the early 20th century, but the immigration laws changed and for a period of, oh, about 40 years, there weren’t as many immigrants coming to the United States as there were in the late 19th century, early 20th century. Now, that situation changed again in the 60’s and by the 1970’s, we were getting more and more immigrants, immigrants not just from Europe where traditionally immigrants had come from, but also from Asia, from Africa, from Latin America. There was a movement in the United States, especially among some of the newer immigrants, to value the differences that people brought with them. This idea became known as “multiculturalism.” “Multi” means many. And the “multiculturalism” idea said people don’t have to change when they come to this country. There doesn’t have to be a melting pot. They can keep some of their original ideas and traditions. So, there are basically these two ideas about what should happen to immigrants, not just in the United States, but, of course, in any country. Those who advocated or said we should adopt a multicultural approach used a different metaphor, the metaphor of a mosaic. A “mosaic” (mosaic) is a kind of artwork that’s created by putting very small pieces of tile, ceramic or stone, possibly glass of different colors and when you look at it from a distance, it has a certain image. Other people use the metaphor of a salad bowl, where you had different elements together, but they all stayed separate in some way, they didn’t melt together, which is the correct metaphor. Well, that’s a continuing debate in the United States. Most people, I think, recognize that different cultures bring different gifts in their own traditions to the United States. People also recognize that in order to live as one country, we all have to share some ideas, some common vision. And exactly what the correct mix of those two are, is a constant topic of not only conversation among Americans, but also of policy, of what our government should do to encourage one or the other vision of the U.S. という以上の文章の最後の〝our government should do to encourage one or the other vision of the U.S.〟の one or the other というのは、 「どっちがどっちか 」「どれか一方[ひとつ] 」という熟語なのか、それとも to encourageの目的語の one と同じく to encourage の目的語のthe other vision of the U.S と、単にorでつながっているのか、 いずれにしろ最後の文章の意味がわかりません。 よろしくお願いします。

  • (287) It is far ……この英文はどのように訳せばよいでしょうか

    (287) It is far ……この英文はどのように訳せばよいでしょうか It is far better to do this, for if you should break one of them, you can put the oxen to the other. Poles of laurel or elm are most free from worms, and a share-beam of oak and a plough-tree of holm-oak. Get two oxen, bulls of nine years; for their strength is unspent and they are in the prime of their age: they are best for work. They will not fight in the furrow and break the plough and then leave the work undone. <試し訳と質問> 前記の例文の順を追って、試し訳と字句の解釈について質問します。 よろしくお願いします。 (1) It is far better to do this, for if you should break one of them, you can put the oxen to the other. こうする方が遥かに良いのだ。もし、どちらかが壊れたら、予備を雄牛に つければよい。 (2) Poles of laurel or elm are most free from worms, and a share-beam of oak and a plough-tree of holm-oak. 月桂樹かニレの轅(ナガエ)なら一番虫が付きにくい。また、鋤の柄なら樫の木、 鋤の材料(耕作の木)には、トキハガシがいい。 *plough-tree; 耕作(鋤)の木; 鋤の材料 この時代は、既に、鉄が鋤の刃に使われていた。 鉄はかなり高価で、ここでは木製らしい。 (3) Get two oxen, bulls of nine years; for their strength is unspent and they are in the prime of their age: they are best for work. 牛を二頭、手に入れるのだ。九歳の雄で、去勢してないのがいい。 彼らの良いところは疲れを見せないことだ。更に、彼らは年齢的に全盛だし、耕作にはもってこいだ。 *for;特に訳さない。 (4)They will not fight in the furrow and break the plough and then leave the work undone. 彼らは轍(ワダチ)を苦にせず、畝を壊さないから、やり残しの仕事のないようにするのだ。 <質問> (a) and then leave the work undone.について   難しいが、叙事詩特有の表現と思って、考えてみる。    *文型;they will leave ではなく、let leaveの意味の命令文である。    *Leave (the work undone)と読む。    *leave;一見、意味が矛盾するが、「任せる、託す」意味がある。           ここでは、訓戒の意味で述べているから、 「やってない仕事を任せよ」→「仕事をやり残すな」      このような読み方で正しいでしょうか。

  • in the most beautiful of

    It will be when you least expect it and it will happen in the most beautiful of ways. in the most beautiful of waysのofは必要なのでしょうか?なくても良い場合は意味が違ってくるのでしょうか?よろしくお願いします

  • in one's elementの言い換え

    You are in your element! (本領発揮しているね!) これを別の英語で言い換えることは可能でしょうか? You are doing a good job. You've got the knack of it. You've got the hang of it. などでしょうか?

  • 和訳お願いしますm(__)m

    well now its 04:37 in the morning...nt sure if you ahead or we of you intime and day.. yesterday i spent most of my time with my friends and watched alot of tv as well こちらの和訳お願いしますm(__)m またどんな感じで返信すればいいでしょうか? お願いしますm(__)m