• ベストアンサー
  • すぐに回答を!

翻訳お願いします。今読んでいる海外の法律雑誌でどうしても訳せない部分が

翻訳お願いします。今読んでいる海外の法律雑誌でどうしても訳せない部分があるので、英語の得意な方で訳していただけないでしょうか。ニュアンスが分かればいいのでよろしくお願いします。 Nor was there any evidence – or even judicial speculation- that the benefit to society of having these particular images appear in a book about the Greteful Dead outweighed the loss to the copyright owner, or that the copyright owner was abusing its rights by refusing to license the use on any terms at all. Like virtually all fair use opinions since passage of the 1976 Act, Bill Graham Archives Recites and purports to apply each of section 107’s four factors, an exercise that offers no more than a semblance of boundaries. 自分で調べた法律単語 ・evidence 証拠 ・judicial speculation 裁判の見解 ・particular 特定の ・abusing 濫用する

共感・応援の気持ちを伝えよう!

  • 回答数1
  • 閲覧数14
  • ありがとう数1

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • 回答No.1

(試訳) 「ザ グレートフル デッド」に関する本でこれらの写真を掲載するという公の利益の方が版権所有者の損失よりもまさっている、亦は版権所有者が使用の許可をいかなる条件でも与えないということで権利の濫用をしているというような証拠又は裁判上の推察さえも出てこなかった。 「1976年版権法」の成立以降の「公正使用」の多数の意見例に従って、Bill Graham Archives 社は107条の4つの要因の適用、つまり外形が類似しているという判断の行使を間接陳述し主張するものである。 以上、参考になれば幸いです。

共感・感謝の気持ちを伝えよう!

質問者からのお礼

とてもわかりやすかったです。ありがとうございます。 これからもわからない部分があったら質問させていただきますのでよろしくお願いします。

関連するQ&A

  • 翻訳お願いします。今読んでいる海外の法律雑誌でどうしても訳せない部分が

    翻訳お願いします。今読んでいる海外の法律雑誌でどうしても訳せない部分があるので、英語の得意な方で訳していただけないでしょうか。ニュアンスが分かればいいのでよろしくお願いします。 一文が長いですがよろしくお願いします。 If there is any doubt about the pli-ability of fair use and its four factors, the appellate history of most fair use cases going to the supreme Court since passage of the 1976 act should dispel it:the common pattern is for the Supreme Court to reverse a court of appeals decision that itself reversed a dutifully applying the four factors. Bill Graham Archives is evidence not only of the futility of trying to predict a fair use outcome from application of the four factors, but also of the power of transaction costs, social benefit, and abuse of right as reach a result that could justify as fair almost any use of a copyrighted work that did no more than alter its medium of presentation.

  • 英文の法律雑誌の和訳お願いします。

    翻訳お願いします。今読んでいるの英文の法律雑誌でどうしても訳せない部分があるので、英語の得意な方で訳していただけないでしょうか。ニュアンスが分かればいいのでよろしくお願いします。 特に3つ目は全く分かりません。 一文が長いですがよろしくお願いします。 The transaction cost and social benefit rubrics of fair use explain why the doctrine has held such an extraordinary fasci-nation for courts and commentators. More than any other doc-trine in copyright, fair use lays bare the foundations and architecture of the entire copyright system. Each time a court balances section 107’s four factors in a particular case, it traces arew the balances that Congress struck in copy-right system as a whole-determining what types of uses should be entitled to drow on copyrighted works without charege; dif-ferentiating between those types of works that need the copy-right incentive and those that need it less; determining the point at which an unexcused taking wil cut too deeply into a produ-cer’s incentives; and, most fundamental of all, weighing the effect of free use on incentives to produce literary, musical and artistic works. 自分で調べた単語 ・transaction cost  取引費用 ・social benefit    社会的便益 ・doctrine       理論 ・copyright      著作権 ・fundamental     要素

  • 翻訳お願いします。 今読んでいる海外の法律雑誌でどうしても意味が理解出

    翻訳お願いします。 今読んでいる海外の法律雑誌でどうしても意味が理解出来ない部分があるので英語が得意な方よろしくお願いします。 The court rested its decision on the transformative use doctrine fashioned by the Supreme Court twelve years earlier to weigh the fair use claim made for a parody of a popular songs, even though, unlike that parody, defendant’s reproduction did no more to “transform” the copyrighted images than to reduce their scale to fit the format of its coffee table book. 法律用語辞書で調べたもの。 ・court(裁判所) ・transformative use(改変的使用) ・fashioned(形成された) ・Supreme Court(最高裁) ・defendant(被告) ・reproduction(複製) 意味が分かればきれいな日本語で無くてもいいのでよろしくお願いします。

  • 翻訳をお願いします

    投資に関する話です。 "All investors in aggregate must hold all stocks in proportion to the fraction that the aggregate market value of any stock represents of the total market value of all stocks." "aggregate"は「総数」で大丈夫かと。 "fraction that~"と"represents of"の扱いに苦労しています。 よろしくお願いします。

  • 長文の和訳お願いします。

    今読んでいる法律雑誌で、よく意味が分からない部分があるのでよろしくお願いします。 課題とかではないので、ニュアンスが分かれば大丈夫です。 Section106, granting the exclusive right to prepare derivative works gives the novel’s copyright owner the opportunity to determine whether the licence fee proposed by the motion picture producer will at least offset the value of other uses of the copyrighted work -in another theatrical motion picture ,say, or in a made-for-television movie-that would consequently be foreclosed. If the licence fee offered by the film producer exceeds the value of any alternative uses,the copyright owner can be expected to enter into a license agreement with the producer; if not, the copyright owner will presumably look elsewhere. Section106, when taken togerher with the copyrighted owner’s self-interest, will thus put the copyrighted work to its most profitable-and presumably benefical-use. 自分で調べた単語 ・Section106 106条 ・copyright owner 著作権者 ・the motion picture  映像 ・copyrighted work  著作物

  • 英文の和訳お願いします。

    今読んでいる法律雑誌で、よく意味が分からない部分があるのでよろしくお願いします。 課題とかではないので、ニュアンスが分かれば大丈夫です。 Section106, granting the exclusive right to prepare derivative works gives the novel’s copyright owner the opportunity to determine whether the licence fee proposed by the motion picture producer will at least offset the value of other uses of the copyrighted work -in another theatrical motion picture ,say, or in a made-for-television movie-that would consequently be foreclosed. If the licence fee offered by the film producer exceeds the value of any alternative uses,the copyright owner can be expected to enter into a license agreement with the producer; if not, the copyright owner will presumably look elsewhere. Section106, when taken togerher with the copyrighted owner’s self-interest, will thus put the copyrighted work to its most profitable-and presumably benefical-use. 自分で調べた単語 ・Section106 106条 ・copyright owner 著作権者 ・the motion picture  映像 ・copyrighted work  著作物

  • 翻訳をお願い致します!

    Become an internationalist and learn to respect all life. Make war on machines. And in particular, the sterile machines of corporate death and the robots that guard them.

  • 翻訳をお願い致します。

    Become an internationalist and learn to respect all life. Make war on machines. And in particular the sterile machines of corporate death and the robots that guard them.

  • 翻訳をお願い致します!

    In a new interview, former Stone Temple Pilots frontman Scott Weiland has claimed that he isn't angry at Chester Bennington for replacing him in STP. He also claimed he is still an owner of the STP name. Weiland said, “I've known Chester for a long time. I got to be pretty close to him on the (2001) Family Values Tour…I don't think Chester did it in a spiteful way. I'm sure, I mean, the brothers DeLeo can be pretty persuasive.” He added, “My feelings were definitely hurt because it wasn't something that was handled right at all…I don't think that it was smart for them to do that…I've played with them for a long time. But then on another side of it, I can't say that I’m that surprised. There's things that have happened in the past that are somewhat similar…so I guess nothing is totally shocking. But I am surprised…at what they did and without checking the legality of it, how they just decided to go and use the (band) name and go and hire another singer and start playing shows with a name that I still am an owner of.”

  • 翻訳をお願い致します!

    How Does Indiegogo Deal With Fraudulent Campaigns? Indiegogo has a comprehensive fraud-prevention system to protect our users. All campaigns and contributions go through a fraud review, which allows us to catch any and all cases of fraud. If we find fraudulent contributions on your campaign, we may remove them from your campaign Funds and Fulfillment pages. We may also ask you for more information, if we determine your campaign to be a high fraud risk. Finally, all campaigns that raise money go through a final examination before any funds are disbursed. Indiegogo requires campaign owners to fufill their Perks as a part of our Terms of Service. Perks are manged solely by campaign owners; we do not guarantee or take any legal responsibility for Perk fulfillment. Contributors can use our Terms of Service as a document in the court of law, should you choose to take legal action against a campaign owner for failing to fulfill a Perk.