• 締切済み
  • すぐに回答を!

和訳お願いします。

和訳お願いします。 また訳せないところがでてきてしまいました。文が途中で切れてしまっているところもありますが、よろしくお願いします。 The technical risk(established by site service and regulatory /agency personnel) The percieved risk(outrage)by the public; and The regulatory risk relative to past, current, and future standards and position. Exhibit 12 presents a suite of issues and concerns that that could fall within the perceived risk assessment. However, each site is unique and its perceived risk will reflect its unique conditions. Perceived risk is perhaps the most difficult of all risks to anticipate and deal with efficiently. For example, it can be manipulated by activist groups interested in controlling or defeating the site restoration project.

共感・応援の気持ちを伝えよう!

  • 回答数1
  • 閲覧数23
  • ありがとう数4

みんなの回答

  • 回答No.1

素人の意訳です。参考程度にお願いします。 siteはインターネット上のサイトを表すものでしょうか?  conditionを「条件」、activistを行動主義者と訳してみました。 Exhibit 12 はperceived risk assessmentの部類に入る一通りの問題を示している。しかし、サイトはそれぞれユニークで、そのperceived riskはその各々のサイトの特徴ある条件を反映しています。おそらくperceived riskは予想することや効果的に扱うことがもっとも難しいリスクでしょう。たとえばサイトをコントロールしたり、サイトの修復を挫かせるようなことに興味を持つ行動主義者によって扱われることがある。 なんかグーグル翻訳みたいですいません。

共感・感謝の気持ちを伝えよう!

関連するQ&A

  • 和訳をお願いします。

    和訳をお願いします。 今読んでいる本で、日本語訳がうまくできません。和訳をお願いできないでしょうか。分かる部分は訳しているため、文の途中で切れているところがありますが、よろしくお願いします。 Environmental risk can be defined as an event or condition that can result in corporate reputation damage or material financial loss or that prevents the company from achieving its business objectives. However, as shown in Exhibit 11 within these three outlying risk perspectives are interlocking risk sub-elements(physical, business, financial, political, and legal) that are derivative of core business functions and constrains. Technical risk is measured in terms of outcomes, magnitudes of the outcomes, and probability of occurrence. It also identifies and gauges the impact of the known and unknown elements that factor into the risk assessment. At heart, technical risk management is an engineering/ science exercise. Typically, industry managers think of technical risk when considering risk management. It is critical to understand that the public’s ranking of perceived risk may not be highly correlated with actual technical risk. Perceived risk can be skillfully modified and presented to arouse the sympathy of the media, politicians, and the regulatory community. However, the regulatory group is generally resistant to this type of pressure and if the restoration approach is not well-planned and presented, it may suffer defeat in the public forum.

  • 和訳をお願いします。

    以下の文について、和訳をお願いします。 1. What good are written Constitutions if few know what is in them, if they are manipulated by lawyers, and routinely and detrimentally disobeyed by some without any penalty? 2. If we routinely ignore it what purpose does it serve? 3. Have Supreme Court cases helped or hindered the causes of African Americans and Native Americans? どれか1つでも結構です。よろしくお願いします。

  • 和訳してほしいです><

    和訳よろしく お願いします。 Experimental・・・At least one variable is manipulated to determine the effect of the manipulation. Subjects are randomly assigned to experimental treatments Quasi-experimental・・・At least one variable is manipulated to determine the effect of the manipulation.Intact,naturally formed groups are used. Nonexperimental Quantitative・・・The incidece,relationships,and distributions of variables are studied. Variables are not manipulated but studied as they occur in a natural setting. Historica・・・A description of past events or facts is developed. Ethnographic・・・A holistic description of present phenomena is developed. 今日中に和訳していただけると嬉しいです。

  • 英文の和訳

    今年受験生で、今 京都大学の過去問を解いていたのですが、英文の全訳が載っていないので、教えてください。 But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one important factor. という文です。 前半のthereの訳し方がわからないのですが、訳は しかし、これは、単に偏見と先入観の闘争でなければならないことを意味するわけではない。 であってますか? 後半はasをどの意味でとればいいのかわかりません。 あと、 When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. という文でthat以下がどの語を修飾しているのか、教えてほしいです。

  • 和訳お願いします

    None of those things, of course. In fact, one might well suppose that the popular feeling is that Americans are a lot better off without any of that tripe. There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

  • 和訳をお願いします。

    Supporters of the WTO argue that it is democratic, in that its rules were written by its member states, many of whom are democracies, who also select its leadership. They also argue that, by expanding world trade, the WTO in fact helps to raise living standards around the world.                    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/country_profiles/2429503.stmより

  • 英文の和訳をお願いします。

    英文の和訳をお願いします。 A useful tool at this point would be an account of bulimia that is both plausible and parsimonious. It should be plausible in that it fits the known facts about bulimia, and it should be parsimonious in that the phenomenon is not overexplained by many concomitant, nonindependent forces. An appropriate theory should define the people at risk for the disorder as well as those not at risk. A good theory should also describe the process of acquiring the symptoms themselves. None of the existing theories can do all of these things. Although the sociocultural approach can define who is at risk, it neither effectively defines who is not at risk nor how bulimics acquire the binge-eating behavior. The clinical perspective is well suited to defining who is at risk and who is not at risk but has not carefully spelled out how it is that the symptoms are acquired. The epidemiological approach, like the clinical approach, is better suited to defining risk factors than to describing processes of symptom acquisition. I wish to propose a model that is well suited to describing the symptom acquisition process, based on social psychological processes.

  • 和訳の添削をお願いします。

    和訳の添削をお願いします。 経済学の内容のため、うまく訳せず困っています。 日本語として不自然な部分や間違った訳し方をしている箇所があれば訂正をお願いします。 本文) 1. There must be perceived differences in risks between domestic and foreign bonds the essence of a risky asset being that its expected real rate of return is uncertain. Either domestic bonds are viewed as relatively risky compared to foreign bonds, or vice-versa. If the two bonds were equally risky then with perfect capital mobility they must be perfect substitutes. 2. There has to be risk-aversion on the part of economic agents to the perceived differences in risk-the principle of risk-aversion is that investors will only be prepared to take on increased risk if there is a sufficient increase in expected real returns to compensate. If investors were not risk-averse then they would not expect a higher return on relatively risky bonds. 訳) 1、危険資産の本質が予測される実質収益率が不明確であるという点にあるので、国内外の債券の間のリスクの差を理解しなければなりません。外債またはその逆と比較して比較的危険であるように、どちらの国内の債券でも見られます。2つの債券が等しく危険であるならば、完全に流動的で、これらは完全な代替品であるにちがいありません。 2、危険を避けようとする経済主体が、リスクの違いを受け入れなければなりません。リスク回避の原則は、期待される本当の収益の十分な増加が補償するためにあるならば、投資家が増加したリスクを引き受ける用意ができているだけであるということです。投資家がリスクを避けようとしないならば、彼らは比較的危険な債券のより高い収益に期待しないでしょう。

  • すいませんが、和訳お願いします。

    In other words, it is conceivable that an analysis of all the relevant factors (ie legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic and other) could lead to a conclusion that there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which a particular intangible asset is expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity. この"there is no foreseeable limit"の部分ですが、"予測できるような制限はない"以外でよい訳はありますか? よろしくおねがいします。

  • 和訳をお願いいたします

    和訳をしていただけるかたのみで お願いできますでしょうか? 多分抽象的な部分は少ないとは思いますが・・ どうぞよろしくお願いいたします Every marriage is a mystery. All marriages do have their difficulties. Life is never the easy road. The occasional quarrel and the thorns and sorrows is perhaps unavoidable in a union that will endures many years, and every marriage has its own crisis and karma to face. Its own task and its own strength. But there is no indication of any serious or insolvable problems in the marriage with this man. It is a chart that promises happiness and a good future that can off set any dark patch. In some ways you’ll feel as though you have waited all you life for this man, that every dream you have ever dreamt is him, and everything else hard though it has been, has just been passing the time until now.