• ベストアンサー
  • すぐに回答を!

和訳をお願いします

和訳をお願いします(>_<) The ocean contains many strange and surprising creatures. One such creature is the puffer fish. This very strange fish is probably the most poisonous creature in the ocean. The poison that this fish produces is 275 times more poisonous than the chemical which is usually used to kill rats. The puffer fish gets its name from the way the fish protects itself from enemies. Whenever it is attacked,the fish blows up its body to three times its normal size! Another strange thing about this fish is the fact that it cannot swim like other fish. Because it dose not have bones like other fish,the puffer fish can only move slowly through the water as it is carried by waves. The puffer fish also has funny teeth. These teeth stick out of the fish's mouth and are used by the fish to open the shells of the creatures that live on the ocean floor. This strange,ugly,and very poisonous fish is actually a very expensive kind of food in Japan.

共感・応援の気持ちを伝えよう!

  • 回答数1
  • 閲覧数373
  • ありがとう数2

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • 回答No.1
  • SPS700
  • ベストアンサー率47% (14705/31285)

    海には、不思議で驚くような生物がたくさんいる。たとえばパッファーフィッシ(=フグ)だ。この不思議な魚は、海に住むもので恐らくももっとも有毒な生物と考えられる。この魚が出す毒は、通常ネズミを殺すのに使う毒物の275倍ある。     パッファーフィッシ(膨れる魚=フグ)は敵から身を守る方法からその名が付いている。敵から攻撃されるとこの魚は、普通の3倍の大きさにふくれあがる。この魚のもう一つの特徴は、他の魚とちがって泳げないことだ。他の魚のような骨が無いので、パッファーフィッシは、波の間に間にのろのろとと動くしか無い。パッファーフィッシは歯も変わっている。この魚の歯は口から外に出ていて、海底の貝をこじ開けて食べる。この、奇妙な、醜い、有毒な魚が、日本では、事実、非常に高価な食料なのである。

共感・感謝の気持ちを伝えよう!

質問者からのお礼

ありがとうございました(^o^)

関連するQ&A

  • 和訳をお願いします

    和訳と選択をお願いします 長くなってすみません(>_<) Air does not seem to have any weight because people can't feel it on their hands and heads. It isn't very heavy, but there is so much of it above the earth that it does weigh a great deal. Some people who have studied the air say that it goes 200 miles above the earth. The air does weigh about 15 pounds on every square inch of house and of every person's body. It( 1 ) many tons on even a small house. The reason this great weight doesn't crush a house is that there is air inside the house. The air inside pushes out with just the same force that the air outside pushes down. There is a weight of 150 pounds under it ( 2 ) , so that the person does not feel any weight at all. It is this great weight of the air up above( 3 ) makes the air on the earth move about in winds. Land gets cold and hot so easily that the winds on land change often. The mountains and rivers and lakes on the land change the direction of the winds. On the ocean the wind does not get hot or cold very fast. Water in great bodies like the ocean does not get warm very quickly in the summer, and there are no mountains in the ocean to turn the winds aside. The winds on the ocean blow steadily from ( 4 ) direction for a long time. (1)1 .amounts to 2.adds to 3.fails to 4. brings to (2)1.pushing open 2.pressing up 3.hanging over 4.pulling down (3)1. this 2.that 3. lest 4.it (4)1.another 2.other 3.one 4. many

  • 次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

    Methylation is a chemical process in which a methyl(CH3)group is added to an atom or molecule. The resulting compound does not usually dissolve in water and is more easily absorbed into organisms such as plankton. Methylmercury is very dangerous because it enters the food chain as soon as it is absorbed into plankton. Next, it ends up in a fish that eats the contaminated plankton. After the contaminated fish is eaten by another fish, the methylmercury stays in the surviving fish's flesh, and the cycle may be repeated over and over. Once the mercury reaches the top of the food chain, for example in a 300-kilogram tuna, it will stay there for the rest of the fish's life. As a result, people are very worried about the effect of eating fish that are high on the food chain or very old. These fish may have very high accumulations of mercury, and thus may be dangerous to eat. Fish that are lower on the food chain, or younger, are seen as safer. As the article makes clear, an important first step is to discover the exact nature of the ocean's mercury methylation process. After the process is understood, it may be possible to control it. Until we can reduce the amount of mercury that accumulates in the ocean, it would be advisable to avoid fish that may be high on mercury, wouldn't it?

  • 和訳お願いします

    The Stalker Thalassomedon was a sea monster with a very long neck. It also had a special means of catching fish: it carried stones in its stomach! These helped keep the largest portion of its body down in the dark water while the long neck slowly rose up toward the fish. The fish had no defense against Thalassomedon―they didn't see the huge animal until it was too late!

  • 和訳をお願いしますm(._.)m

    “The ocean is a dig missing part” of the mercury cycle, says Pirrone, who also headed the United Nations Environment Programme’s scientific assessment last year for future mercury policy making. Robie Macdonald, an Arctic mercury specialist at Canada’s department of oceans and fisheries, says that although mercury in the atmosphere has increased by about 400%in the past 100-150 years, concentrations seem to have risen by only about 30% in the oceans. “We’ve been so busy looking at the atmosphere, not really looking at the oceans,” he says. “Both papers are really important in terms of changing community attention to what mercury does and its risks.” Any control measures on methlmercury, however, must take into account how much comes, unavoidably, from natural sources and how much is from anthropogenic sources such as the combustion of fossil fuels, points out Pirrone. And controversy continues on that score. A lack of data on changes in methylmercury levels in fish, and on natural or anthropogenic origins of the compound, led to a California court decision in March 2009 that allowed tuna-canning companies to avoid labeling methylmercury levels in their fish products. The US Food and Drug Administration is currently evaluating its guidelines on the risks of consuming methylmercury in fish. よろしくお願いします^^;

  • この文章の和訳をお願いします。

    Thalassomedon was a sea monster with a very long neck. it also had a special means of catching fish : it carried stones in its stomach! there helped keep the largest portion of its body down in the dark water while the long neck slowly rose up towards the fish. the fish had no defense against Thalassomedon they did not see huge animal until it was too late!

  • 和訳をお願いします

    和訳をお願いします(>_<) The sea currents between Japan and the west coast of the United States have created a "landfill " in the middle of the ocean. Garbage floating in the sea gradually reaches this areas and gets trapped. The areas is said to be three times bigger than Japan. It is called the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

  • 和訳をお願いします!

    A secure labeling system is in place for wine and in some countrious for beef. A similar certification system of tracking fish from the ocean to the consumer could reduce the demand for, and therefore the price of endangered, uncertified products. 1文目はis以降が上手くつかめなくて、2文目は ,and&#65374;endangered,の挿入でめちゃくちゃになって上手く訳せません。 お時間がある方、どうかよろしくお願いします!

  • 和訳お願いします

    Which statement about Kronosaurus is NOT true? It lived in the sea that used to cover Australia. It stayed in the water all the time. Its teeth were very large. It was a very dangerous predator.

  • 和訳お願いします

    Think of it this way. Each of us is, more or less, an egg. Each of us is a unique, irreplaceable soul enclosed in a fragile shell. This is true of me, and it is true of each of you. And each of us, to a greater or lesser degree, is "The System". The System is supposed to protect us, but sometimes it take on a life of its own, and then it begins to kill us and cause us to kill others-coldly, efficiently, systematically.

  • 長いですが、和訳お願いします

    use of comma before "that" Hello, I know that usually ( or always) a comma is never written before the word "that", and yet, I found this sentence in Charles Dickens' book - Christmas carol: It was with great astonishment, and with a strange, inexplicable dread, that as he looked, he saw this bell begin to swing. is it the compound adjective clause "and with a strange, inexplicable dread" that is forcing the use of comma here? thanks! ---------------------- I'd say that at least indirectly that is the case. Most lists of rules for the use of commas have a "catch-all" rule at the end that says something like, "use a comma in any other case when it is necessary to prevent misreading or misunderstanding." The complex modifier separates the final word dread so much from the first part of the sentence that without a comma (and its associated pause), the reader woud be likely to think of the "that clause" as a complement of dread rather than as the completing clause of the main sentence beginning with, "It was …." In general, the rule "don't put a comma before that" is oversimplified. Certainly you don't put a comma before a restrictive relative clause that begins with that, and doing so is a mistake that is often made. So I see why the "rule" was written, but there are many uses of the word that, and sometimes it will happen that a comma comes naturally before one. __________________ ---- Pete