The Relationship Between States and Violence
- According to Weber, the state is defined as a human community that claims the monopoly of legitimate force within a given territory.
- Weber also emphasizes that the state has a close relationship with violence.
- In terms of its means, the modern state can be defined by its use of physical force.
- ベストアンサー
英語についての質問です
According to Weber, all states are based on what? という質問がありました。 で、文中の中からWeberについて記載のある箇所を探したのですが… [A] state is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.” Second, the state has an “intimate” relationship with violence (as Weber describes it). [T]he state cannot be defined in terms of its ends. . . . [T]here is no task that one could say has always been exclusive and peculiar to . . . the state. . . . Ultimately, one can define the modern state sociologically only in terms of the specific means peculiar to it, as to every political association, namely, the use of physical force. とありました。 質問に対する答えは２つ目のthe state has an “intimate” relationship with violence でいいでしょうか？ 基礎になっているか、と聞かれたら違う気もするのですが… もしくはこの中には答えはないでしょうか？（私が見落としているだけかもしれません） ＊＊ 英文の質問に対する答えがthe state has an “intimate” relationship with violence であっているかどうか。 私が引用してきた文章の中に別の答えがあるなら、「これじゃない」と教えて欲しいです。 また、答えになりそうな文章がない場合も、そのような旨を教えて欲しいです。 ややこしいのですが、よろしくお願いします。
- wxw
- お礼率89% (1045/1166)
- 英語
- 回答数1
- ありがとう数1
- みんなの回答 （1）
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
以下のとおりお答えします。 ＞質問に対する答えは２つ目のthe state has an “intimate” relationship with violence でいいでしょうか？ ⇒はい、これでいいと思います。 ＞基礎になっているか、と聞かれたら違う気もするのですが… ⇒「基礎になっている」というか、「それに立脚している」とでもすれば、ほんの少し肯きやすいように思いますが、いかがでしょう。 ということで、 ＞According to Weber, all states are based on what? に対する答えは、 According to Weber, all states are based on violence. ということになりますね。
関連するQ&A
- 英文についての質問です
According to Weber are states defined by what they do (their ends) or how they do it (their means)? という質問があり、回答の一文を探したのですが、 As Weber explains: one can define the modern state sociologically only in terms of the specific means peculiar to it, as to every political association, namely, the use of physical force. この文を簡単に答えることはできないでしょうか？ one can define the modern state sociologically only in terms of the specific means peculiar to it, as to every political association このように少し省くことはできるでしょうか？ もし他にも言いやすい表現などあれば教えて欲しいです。 よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 添削してください
Do you agree that all states, even democratic ones, are ultimately based on the use or threat of violence? Why or why not? このような質問があり、 I agree. Becaue as Weber discribed, the state and violence have an intimate relationship. Violence is the foundation and features of all state, as it also includes democracy. ⇨Weberが述べるように国家と暴力は深い（intimate）関係がある。 暴力は全ての国家の基盤と特徴であり、それは民主主義も含まれているため。 と回答しようかと思うのですが、こちらの英文を添削して欲しいです。 よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文についての質問
Do states limit their use of violence to legitimate purposes? という質問があり、答えになりそうな文章を抜き出しました。 But no state always confines itself only to legitimate violence. More precisely, the government of the state is made up of individuals, and inevitably some of those individuals, in seeking their political ends, will employ violence outside the bounds of the rules. つまり「国家は常に合法的な暴力だけに限られている」ということですよね？ ということは答えは「Yes」でいいのでしょうか？ Yes, no state always confines itself only to legitimate violence. こちらの回答でいいでしょうか？ よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文についての質問です。
Can the power/violence of the state be justified? という質問があり、下記のような内容の文章がありました。 Huemer calls the special moral status we grant to government the problem of political authority, and argues that such legitimacy is an illusion, that nobody can have a right to rule, nor can anybody have an obligation to obey. In the Anglo-American political tradition, the justification of state legitimacy comes from social contract theory. In this theory the violence of the state is justified by comparing it to the supposedly much greater violence in a state of nature. 質問の回答として According to the Anglo-American political tradition, justification of the legitimacy of the state comes from social contract theory. In this theory, state violence is justified by comparing state of nature with much larger violence. (英米？政治によると、国家の合法性の正当化は社会契約理論から来ている。 この理論では、国家の暴力は、自然の国家をはるかに大きな暴力と比較することによって正当化される。) でいいでしょうか？ 添削をお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 翻訳してください。
Cultural Violence Cultural Violence legitimizes direct and structural violence by convincing people that, in the name of God or of histry, they are not only justified but also duty bound to harm or even kill others. Some relilgions, political ideologies and nationalisms are moderate and tolerant. Others however, place so high a premium on the self and so thoroughly dehumanize the other that, in the eyes of their adherents, massacre of the other seems an acceptable option. Passive Violence We must begin to understand the extent of violence that each of us practice ourselves consciously or unconsciously in our daily lives. Passive violence is indirect. It can be very subtle forms of pressure, discrimination, coercion or disrespect. Passive violence causes anger and anger causes physical violence. The relationship between passive violence and physical violence is the same as the relationship between gasoline and fire. Passive violence fuels the fire of physical violence, which means if we want to put out the fire of physical violence we have to cut off the fuel supply. The fuel supply is us. The very spaciousness of the American continent has given rise to what is called the frontier spirit, which was originally a challenge to the natural regors of an uncultivated terrain, seems to overlook the existence of other peoples. When the Americans are forced to deal with other nations and peoples, the frontier spirit asserts itself in the form of attempts to bring bear the immense power of the United States.
- 締切済み
- その他（ビジネス・キャリア）
- 英文についての質問
似たような質問が続きすみません。 What did Edmund Burke say is the problem with the state?という質問に対し、 He said the problem of the state is that all states trying to control human violence must be run by members of the same violence species. という回答をしようと思うのですが、こちらの英文の添削をして欲しいです。 下記の内容から少し文章を変えて英文を作りました。 Whether or not we accept the legitimacy of states as at least a theoretical possibility, we all are concerned with controlling the violence of the state. Edmund Burke was pessimistic about the possibility, given that all states intended to control the violence of humans must be run by members of that same violent species. The state itself, he argued, was the problem. よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の翻訳をお願いしますm(_ _)m(2)
The short-term stores are itself has very limited capacity. Some information processed in the short-term store is transferred to the long-term store,which has unlimited capacity. Long-term storage of information often depends on rehearsal,with a direct relationship between the amount of rehearsal in the short-term store and the strength of the stored memory trace. According to Atkinson and Shiffrin(1968),short-term memory is involved before long-term memory. However,an increasingly popular view is that short-term memory is only involved after long-term memory.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英語の質問です。
(１)Sue was very helpful . She gave me ( 2). (1)a good advice (2)some good advice (3)many good advices (4)much good advices (２)The newspaper article contained (2 ) useful information. (1)many (2)few (3)a (4)a lot of (３)Elizabeth and her sister take ( 2) helping their mother every night. (1)head (2)turns (3)advantage (4)way (４)It is not easy to make ( 3) him. (1)a friend in (2)friend with (3)friends with (4)griends to (５)Ken has been on good (4 )with Ted for more than ten years . (1)condition (2)connections (3)term (4)terms 採点お願いします。 可能であれば、訳もおねがいします。 よろしくお願いします
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- off-and-on about
I am in the middle of a divorce from my husband of almost 10 years. I had an affair with an out-of-state co-worker toward the end of my marriage and developed feelings for him. In the meantime, my co-worker has been off-and-on about the status of our relationship, and I ended up sleeping with a colleague during a work trip. off-and-on about the status of our relationshipはどのような意味でしょうか？よろしくお願いします
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- パターン、グラフ、関数、、質問英語です。
少し長いですが問題は以下の通りです。 Emily is creating matchstick patterns using a series of matches。(画像の通り） The table below gives the pattern number and the number of matches she has used for each pattern.(画像の通り） 1) Find the rule that gives the number of matches, M, in terms of the pattern number, n. 答え）M = 5 n + 1 これはOKです。 2) Using your rule from part 1) above or otherwise how many matches would there be in pattern number 15? 答え） 76 これもOKです。 3) On the grid drawn below, sketch a graph showing the relationship between the pattern number and number of matches require, up to pattern number 12. 答えは添付出来ませんでしたがこれもOKです。 4) A group of students in Emily's class are going to create all the designs up to design 'n' . Give an expression involving n for the total (T) number of matches they will need. 答え） T(n) = 2.5 n ^2 + 3.5 n これがさっぱりわかりません。 2.5 や 3.5 や 2乗といった数字がどこから（どうして）出てくるのかさっぱりわかりません。 考え方を教えて頂けますか？
- ベストアンサー
- 数学・算数
お礼
よかったです！ 答えになる箇所の見当は当たっていたようで安心しました！ 確かに立脚している、だと納得いきます。 Based onの訳し方の問題ですね…。 夜遅く？（朝早く？）に回答ありがとうございます！ 大変参考になりました！