The Usage of 'Who': Explained
- Learn about the different usage of 'who' in English sentences
- 'Who' is used as a relative pronoun to refer to people in a defining or non-defining clause.
- In the given sentence, 'who' is used to refer to the people who survive after being injured by mines.
- ベストアンサー
whoの用法について
Antipersonnel mines are laid on or under the ground so that they explode when they are stepped on.They have only one purpose: to kill and injure people. Many of those injured by mines die a slow death. Those who survive often live lives of misery, poverty, and discrimination. 最後の英文のThose who survive often live lives of misery, poverty, and discrimination.のwhoはどの用法で用いられているかわかりません どなたか教えていただけないでしょうか?
- dikutori
- お礼率1% (4/243)
- 英語
- 回答数1
- ありがとう数1
- みんなの回答 （1）
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
those who = the ones who 関係代名詞（句）です。 http://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=those+who 生き残る人々も大抵は、悲惨で貧しく差別の人生を送ることになる。
関連するQ&A
- わからない英文があります
Antipersonnel mines are laid on or under the ground so that they explode when they are stepped on.They have only one purpose: to kill and injure people. Many of those injured by mines die a slow death. Those who survive often live lives of misery, poverty, and discrimination. この英文でThose who survive often live lives of misery, poverty, and discrimination.の survive often live lives...についてなんですが動詞surviveの後に再び動詞liveが来るなんてありえるのですか? Those who survive often live lives of misery, poverty, and discrimination.の英文はどのように日本語に訳せばいいでしょうか? あとdie a ～death という熟語はどういう意味ですか?
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 文章の訳を、また自分の訳の確認をして欲しいです
訳を教えて欲しいです。 I expect the reason that disabled people are said to have easier lives in Western societies is because Westerners are willing to let other people be who they are. said to have と続いているのがよく分からないです それと n Western societies is because と isのあとにすぐbecauseがきてるのもよくわからないです。 Where a great many ethnic groups live in one nation, as in the U.S.A ore parts of Europe, if you rejected others because they were defferent in the way that happens in Japan, there`d be no end to it. Where a great many ethnic groups live in one nation, as in the U.S.A ore parts of Europeは a great many ethnic groups live in one nation in the U.S.A ore parts of Europeと考えていいんでしょうか？ それとthere`d be no end to itというのがうまく訳せず、困っています。 Discrimination and prejudice await those who do. これも訳がうまくできません。。 I am not the only one who has been given a part to play. 私は役割を与えられてきた唯一（の人間）ではない。という訳はあっているでしょうか？ Japanese children and teenagers today often dwell on what they see as their own imperfections (and they are probably not the only kids who do that). 日本の今日の子供たちや10代は自分自身が完璧ではないと自分を見ることにたびたびくよくよ悩む。 という訳はどうでしょうか？ 括弧内と dwell on以降がなんかよく分かりません。。 I would like to see everyone live with a proud awareness of who they are so that they don`t waste the life they have been given, but live it to the full. さいごのほうのthe life they have been given, but live it to the fullがよく分からないです どのように訳せばいいんでしょうか？ 長くなりましたが、おねがいします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- as best they can？
They are human beings, who are trying to survive as best they can and …. このas best they canはas possibleと似ていますが、 何か関係しているのですか？
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- この those は？
センター試験の文法問題で、 Respectable activities are those approved of by society because they are considered to be fair and honest. という文の文頭の Respectable を選択させる問題がありましたが、この文の those が何を指すのかわかりません。 those who の who が省略されたものだと思ったのですが、違うような気がします。
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 構文分析よろしくお願い致しますm(_ _)m
The people I admire most are those who are sensitive and want to create something or discover something, and do not see life in terms of power, and such people get more of a chance under a democracy than elsewhere. They found religions, great or small, or they produce literature and art, or they do disinterested scientific research, or they may be what is called "ordinary people", who are creative in their pricate lives, bring up their children decently, for instance, or help their neighbours. 構文分析よろしくお願い致します！ できるだけ丁寧に教えて頂けると嬉しいです。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 一文の翻訳をお願いします。（英語）
読解問題からの抜粋です。以下(1)の１文を訳していただけませんか。 (1)Ｎｉｎｅ Ｃｈｉｌｄｒｅｎ ｉｎ ｔｅｎ ｃｏｕｌｄ ｓｕｃｃｅｅｄ ｉｎ ｌｅａｒｎｉｎｇ ａ ｍｕｓｉｃａｌ ｉｎｓｔｒｕｍｅｎｔ， ａｎｄ ｓｏｍｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｏｓｅ ｗｈｏ ｇｉｖｅ ｕｐ ｌｅａｒｎｉｎｇ ｉｎｓｔｒｕｍｅｎｔｓ ａｒｅ ｊｕｓｔ ａｓ ｍｕｓｉｃａｌ ａｓ ｔｈｏｓｅ ｗｈｏ ｃａｒｒｙ ｏｎ， ｓａｙ Ａｔｒａｈ ａｎｄ Ｄｏｕｇｌａｓ． ちなみにこの後には、以下の文が続いています。（これは問題なく理解できました。） (2)They fail not because of lack of ability but because they are playing the wrong instrument. 特に(1)の文中「ｊｕｓｔ ａｓ ｍｕｓｉｃａｌ ａｓ ｔｈｏｓｅ ｗｈｏ ｃａｒｒｙ ｏｎ」がよくわかりません。この箇所の文法説明もしていただけたら大変助かります。 すみませんが、どうぞよろしくお願いいたします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 【】内を簡単に説明せよ、という問題です。
【】内を簡単に説明せよ、という問題です。 Psychobiographies are psychologically informed accounts of individual lives. They are, in effect, stories-although not entirely fictional-about particular individuals, generally those who are famous. However, not all life stories are told by professional psychobiographers about celebrated people. Some are told by ordinary people, about ordinary people:themselves. Psychologists who study 【"life narratives"】 argue that everyone of us is engaged in an ongoing process of telling his or her own life story, and（以下省略しました） 私は、「有名人の伝記」と答えました。 （stories-although not entirely fictional-about particular individuals, generally those who are famous.のくだりからです） 添削していただきたいです。そしてもし間違いなら、どうしてそうなるのかを教えて頂けないでしょうか。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英語長文
Americans worship youth. To look at any magazine or advertisement, you'd think that no one over 50 lived in America. Likewise, most of the popular literature, films and television shows have to do with the lives of young people. No one wants to see, hear, read or think about old age. As a result, older people are virtually ignored. Lack of interest in the elderly takes many forms. Social welfare programs and medical care for older people are woefully inadequate. The proof of this is that some of America's older population live below the poverty line, surviving on dog food and scraps from garbage cans. More and more of them can no longer afford housing and live on the street. Those who have enough money to be comfortable when they retire, often live lonely lives in retirement communities or nursing homes where they are forgotten by the younger members of their families. One reason Americans are so reluctant to have the elderly around is because they've been taught to see people in terms of productivity. An older person who can no longer go to work is seen as unproductive and therefore useless. Also, America has become a country of nuclear, rather than extended families. When both the husband and wife work, no one can afford to stay home and care for an elderly person. This issue that Americans are overlooking when they overlook the elderly is that everyone gets old. Old age is just another, equally important stage of life. By shutting the elderly out of our lives, we are refusing to learn from their experiences, refusing to learn about ourselves. ・1段落2文目、“To look at～”を節に←節にする、が良く分かりませんでした。 ・“Likewise”は何と「同様に」と述べている? →自分はany magazine or advertisementとしました。 ・2段落3文目“The proof of this～”のthisとは? →高齢者のための社会福祉政策や医療がひどく不十分であること、としました。 ・3段落半ばの“Also”は何について「2つめ」を述べているか? →アメリカ人が高齢者をあまり受け入れたがらない(?)理由(について)、としました。言いたいことは何となく分かるのですが… お願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 自分で考えたのですが苦手で…どなたかお願いします！
高校二年生です… 次に書く英語を和訳したいです。。 ですが、私は昔から英語が苦手で… 18文あって、長いかもしれないですが ヒントだけでも良いのでお願いします！！ １：Two dogs enter a room in a senior citizens` home. ２：Then everyone begins to smile and laugh. ３："I think it`s great. ４：It`s lovely to see them and they`re so frindly,"says a lady who is 97 years old. ５：She looks forward to the days when the dogs come. ６：Friendly dogs can often help older people and sick children. ７：The dogs help them by giving love. ８：In homes where older people live, some of them are lonely. ９：They don`t have much to enjoy. １０：They often just sit or sleep in their chairs. １１：They talk to no one. １２：They do nothing. １３：When the dogs visit the home, the older people become friendlier to other people. １４：They become more active and feel happier. １５：The dogs are chosen carefully. １６：They must be quiet when they visit the older people and not jump on them. １７：The dogs` visits are short. １８：But those visits change the lives of many older people. 誤字や脱字があったら本当にすみません；；
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- who
英語やり直し組です "It shows that the Ethiopians are desperate," said Abdi. "It means they cannot manage the situation. The regime in Addis Ababa thinks that Somalis will be subdued by their military machine. I assure you it will never happen. We have freedom fighters who are fighting the occupation of the Ethiopians. Ethiopians will be the ones, who will be compelled to retreat and withdraw." (1)最後のwhoについて教えてください この記事は勿論、この関係の記事を見るのは今日が初めてなので状況はよくわからないのですが、最初に見たときwhoはエチオピア人に見えました。しかし文の流れから「エチオピア人は一つになるだろう、○○は撤退させられるだろう」という意味から最後のwhoはThe regime in Addis Ababa？のことのように見えます。 このようにwho＝直前の人物 ではなく今までの出てきた人物なら別に誰でもいいのでしょうか？ お願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
お礼
いつも助かります