- ベストアンサー
英作すると・・・
「環境負荷低減と効率的土地利用を可能とする環境保全型畜産経営モデルの開発」という言葉を、英語で表したいのですが、私なりに「The Development of the Environmental-Protection-Type Livestock Farming Business Model which Considered Environmental Load and Efficient Use of Agricultural Land」としたのですが、何かおかしな点や、改善すべき点があれば、アドバイス頂きたいです。
- みんなの回答 （2）
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
その他の回答 (1)
環境保全型 = environmentally friendly ネットからの例： The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry sets the "Guideline on the implementation of the direct payment for environmentally friendly livestock farming" to local government. 畜産経営モデル = livestock farming model (farmingiに経営の意味も含まれます) ネットからの例： livestock farming model based largely on the separation of the breeding from the fattening phases 可能とする = that enables us to ネットからの例： We have successfully developed a generic model that enables us to quickly adapt to changing. business needs. このtoの次に環境負荷を低減し、効率的に土地を利用するを加えれば完成。 環境負荷を低減する = reduce burdens on the environment ネットからの例： "Technically we already have everything we need to ensure sustainable power supplies and at the same time dramatically reduce burdens on the environment", said Sharef addressing the 20th World Energy Congress. 効率的に土地を利用する = use land efficiently ネットからの例： When firms use land efficiently, the land rises in value. 他にもいろんな言い方があると思います。私訳は一例です。最終的には "The development of an environmentally friendly livestock farming model that enables us to reduce burdens on the environment and use land efficiently"
お礼
ご回答、ありがとうございました。大変勉強になります、是非、参考にさせて頂きます。
関連するQ&A
- 英語の訳がうまくいきません・・・・。
英語の訳がうまくいきません・・・・。 以下の英文はどう訳しますか？？ 特に中間が複雑です お願いします！！ Hill farming contained most of what remained of the sectoral fallow system. All crops were tuberous. In other parts of the Andes an anciently domesticated grain plant, canihua (Chenopodium pallidicaule) was also grown in the highest land, as high as 4500 m in southern Peru and Bolivia (Sauel 1933:33-35). The potato was overwhelmingly dominant, with ulluco, oca (oxalis tuberose), and mashua (Tropaelum tuberosum) in lesser quantity. In the Paucartambo valley alone there were 79 potato landraces and 5 of ulluco. Some landraces were limited to the upper zone. High altitude potato landraces are frost resistant and bitter and are processed by freezing and drying. Other landraces have a much wider altitudinal range. Hill farming land was normal prepared by hoeing the soil into high beds, breaking the sod with the Andean foot plow, the chakitaklla, and pulverizing the clods by hand. Fallowing was normal practice, enduring up to 7 years. Small livestock grazed during the fallow period, the manure being added by folding the livestock on intended field sites at night. Whereas the sectoral fallow formerly separated crops from livestock, and farmers still grouped their field together to facilitate protection in the 1980s; some fenced their field, an added labor.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 添削お願いします
「また、トランプ大統領は環境プロジェクトの一環として内務省、農務省、環境保護庁にそれぞれ12％、21％、31％の削減を提案しました。 少ない予算でも出来ないことはないと思う。逆に予算が多ければ、プロジェクトが上手くいくのか、と問うとそういうわけでもないと思う。」 In addition, President Trump has proposed reductions of 12%, 21% and 31% respectively to the the Department of Interior, U.S.Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency as part of the environment project. I think there are things that can be do something with a small budget. On the contrary (In contrast), if the budget is high, the project necessarily would go well. （内務省、農務省、環境保護庁をそれぞれ英語に置き換えるとどうなるかを調べた結果 the Department of Interior、U.S.Department of Agriculture、Environmental Protection Agencyと出てきました。） 反対に（逆に）という表現方法は色々あると思いますが、どれが適切などあるでしょうか？ こちらの英文を添削して欲しいです。 よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の和訳で困っています 和訳を教えてください
英文の和訳で困っています 和訳を教えていただきたいです よろしくお願いします！！ The LPGS were divided into three types according to the degree of collectivization and the resulting distribution of the collective income: collective agriculture, wherever possible using meadow land and woodland; collective animal husbandry, based on the so-called ‘perspective plan’; bringing together all areas of agricultural and forestry use, machinery and equipment and all the live-stock. There were restrictions on agricultural land and the numbers of cattle for one’s own use (e.g. half a hectare per family). The mood of the Soviet people was marked both by relief and mourning. There was hope of a reduction of state terror and a relaxation in relations with the Western powers. Inevitably, as a result of the forced expropriations, there was wide-scale destruction of the identity, habits and traditions of the farming community, who lost their individuality and now had to function as collective producers.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英字新聞翻訳添削のお願い
英字新聞を翻訳しました。Landに辞書にあるどの語を当てはめるか迷いました。文脈を考えて訳したつもりですが、どなたか添削をお願いします。 (0)One-Fifth of China’s Farmland Is Polluted, State Study Finds By EDWARD WONG APRIL 17, 2014 (0)中国の農地の５分の１は汚染されている。 政府の研究成果 エドワード・ウォング 2014年4月17日 (1)BEIJING — The Chinese government released a report on Thursday that said nearly one-fifth of its arable land was polluted, a finding certain to raise questions about the toxic results of China’s rapid industrialization, its lack of regulations over commercial interests and the consequences for the national food chain. (1)北京：中国政府は、中国の急速な工業化の毒物に起因する結果について、提案するための確かである調査結果のレポートを公開した。 それによると、中国の耕地のほぼ１／５は汚染されているとのことである。 (2)The report, issued by the Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Land Resources, said 16.1 percent of the country’s soil was polluted, including 19.4 percent of farmland. (2)環境保護省、国土資源省より発行された国土レポートには、「農地（耕地）の19.4%を含む国の地表の16.1％が汚染されていた」と書かれていた。 (3)The report was based on a study done from April 2005 to last December on more than 2.4 million square miles of land across mainland China, according to Xinhua, the state news agency. (3)「政府ニュース局？」である新華社通信によると、このレポートは、2005年4月から昨年12月まで 行われれ、中国本土全域の土地2万4千平方マイルにいての研究に基づくものだった。 (4)The report said that “the main pollution source is human industrial and agricultural activities,” according to Xinhua. (4)新華社によれば、その報告は、「主要な汚染源は人類の工業活動、農業活動」であるという。 → 新華社の報道によれば、その報告では、主要な汚染源は工業活動および農業活動としている。 (5)More specifically, factory waste products, irrigation of land by polluted water, the improper use of fertilizers and pesticides, and livestock breeding have all resulted in tainted farmland, the report said. (5)すなわち「（もっと正確に言えば）、「工場の廃棄物、汚染水による土地の“灌漑”、肥料や農薬の不適切な使用、家畜の飼育は、全て汚れた耕地の結果となった。」とレポートはいう。 → すなわち、工場の廃棄物、汚染水の耕地への給水、肥料や農薬の乱用、家畜の飼育は全て、耕地の汚染の原因である」とレポートは指摘した。 (6)The study found that 82.8 percent of the polluted land was contaminated by inorganic material. (6)研究は、汚染された国土の82.8％は、無機物質により汚染されたことを見いだした。 → その研究の結果「汚染された国土の82.8％は、無機物質によるものである」ことがわかった。 (7)The three most common pollutants found were cadmium, nickel and arsenic, and the levels of these materials in the soil had risen sharply since land studies in 1986 and 1990. (7)発見された最も一般的な３つの汚染物質は、カドミウム、ニッケル、ヒ素であり、国土（耕地？）の３物質の(濃度）レベルは1986年および1990年の国土（耕地）の研究から急激にひどくなった。
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 翻訳のチェックしていただけますか？困っています。
以下の文章翻訳してみましたが、違和感がある箇所があれば教えていただけますか？ No information on possible family history of skin cancer, habits and environmental triggers or other confounders were reported making it difficult to ascribe the development of malignant melanoma or its recurrence to treatment A. . 家族の悪性メラノ－マ既往歴、生活習慣、環境等の交絡因子については報告されていない為、悪性メラノ－マの進行或は再発がAの治療に起因しているかどうか明らかにすることは困難であった。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の訳を教えてください！！
Dry land was nowhere tilled, and there were no working livestock. Use of herbicides to reduce labor time spent on weeding has become widespread since the 1970s, although there has been limited adoption of chemical fertilizer. Except for one of Padoch’s groups who farmed a lowland area, all worked uplands with little flat land, sometimes none, within forests of very high biodiversity. All cleared fields in secondary forest of different ages as well as in old forest (also called primary forest or primeval forest in much of the literature, although it may not always be so); some groups worked only secondary forest and none worked only old forest. All these people lived, or had earlier lived, in longhouses in which the apartment of each family (nuclear or extended) opened onto a common veranda; all managed their farming as families, not as corporate groups; and although there was much joint work, no farms were owned or worked by groups. For convenience of joint work and protection of crops from wildlife, Borneo families in all areas commonly made fields closely at once; decisions on what type of land to cultivate therefore were made by agreement among a group of households. All groups recounted a history that included voluntary and enforced migrations, wars, and epidemic disease, leading to major fluctuations in the population of any given area, especially since 1800. This continued until very recent times, including the 1980s and 1990s among the East Kalimantan Kenyah described by Colfer, Peluso, and Chin. Spiritual and magical beliefs governing farming activity had much in common, and where they seem to be of little modern importance, they were much more central in a recent past; even in areas where people have fully converted to Christianity, spiritual beliefs have not died. 長文で本当に申し訳ないのですが、どうぞよろしくお願いします！！！
- 締切済み
- 英語
- ☆★環境問題に関する自由英作文★☆
いつもありがとうございます。 環境問題に関する自由英作文を書いたので、添削よろしくお願いいたします。 問題は種々の大学の過去問を参考に自作しましたので、 問題文自体の英語が拙いかもしれませんが、 そこも含めて、ご指摘いただけると、ありがたく存じます。 [Question] Describe what environmental problem you are the most interested in and explain the challenge to address, and the solutions. Write your essay in four paragraphs. [Answer] One of the environmental problems I am the most interested in is the international arrangements such as the Framework Convention on Climate Change. More than ten years ago, the third Conference of the Parties, what you call COP3, was held in Kyoto, where the Kyoto Protocol was adopted. About five years ago, this protocol went into force without the agreement of the United States, which eliminated the second most CO2 in 2009, followed by China. In addition, developing countries including China and India are not forced to decrease emissions. For these two reasons, many environmental specialists wonder if this treaty is effective for the environmental problem. Because of this matter, actually, Australia did not join it at the beginning. (This country joined now.) It seems strange to me that the countries, the GDPs of which occupy the first and second places, are not obligated to decrease greenhouse gas such as CO2. To solve this problem, I think that the Japan's government should lead the green innovation field all over the world. In fact, the government regards green innovation as one of a few available strategies for economic growth. It is often said that environmental technologies of Japan is leading. In my opinion, the government should promote these technologies and help export them. Because China's government says that the country cannot help emitting CO2 to develop, all Japan can do is to give China the same development as that done by emitting extraordinarily much CO2. By importing the technologies, China could develop without emitting so much. Japan's government should show the advantages to that of China; for example, China would improve the international trust, which is the probably most serious problem China faces now. To promotes these green innovation, Japan's government need to secure a considerable financial source. As you know, the government is facing a budget deficit; according to OECD, the budget deficit in relation to GDP of Japan is internationally much and the balance of Japan's debt in 2010 is by far the heaviest. This is why it is very difficult to secure the resource for promoting the green technologies. Because this field is surely expected to improve, however, the government would not love anything. Moreover, it would help the government solve another problem of unemployment. (376 words) *辞書代わりにALCを利用しました。(http://www.alc.co.jp/) *indentできないので、一行挿入しました。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳例を教えて下さい。
(1)If climate change and population growth progress at their current pace, in roughly 50 years farming as we know it will no longer exist. This means that the majority of people could soon be without enough food or water. But there is a solution that is surprisingly within reach, and that is to move most farming into cities, and grow crops in tall, specially constructed buildings. It’s called vertical farming. (2)The floods and lack of rainfall that have come with climate change are destroying traditional farmland. Three recent floods, for example, have cost the US billions of dollars in lost crops, with even more serious losses in topsoil. In India changes in rain patterns and temperature could reduce India’s agricultural output by 30% or more by the end of the century. (3)What’s more, population increases will soon reduce the amount of land available to American farmers. The amount of land for farming per person has decreased from about an acre in 1970 to roughly half an acre in 2000, and it is expected to decline to about a third of an acre by 2050. With billions more people on the way, before we know it the traditional soil-based farming model developed over the last 12,000 years will no longer be possible anywhere. In short, it has become alarmingly clear that the world must find new methods of food production and distribution. (4)Now imagine a vertical farm built within the limits of a major city. Food production would take advantage of hydroponic methods that use far less water than conventional cultivation techniques, in some cases as much as 90 percent less. When we apply the vertical farm concept to countries that are water-challenged, such as those in the Middle East, the benefits of vertical farming look even more attractive. For this reason the world’s very first vertical farm may be established there, although the idea has now attracted considerable interest from architects, scientists and governments all over the world. (5)The list of benefits of the vertical farm is indeed long. To start with, crop production would no longer be limited by seasons or be impacted by poor whether. The farm itself would behave like a functional ecosystem in which waste is recycled to be used over and over again. By supplying a continuous quantity of fresh vegetables and fruits to city residents, such farms would help prevent health problems, some of which arise from the lack of quality food in our diet. They wouldn't only improve urban life, but also help to restore the land that was damaged by traditional farming. For every indoor acre farmed, some 10 to 20 outdoor acres of farmland could be allowed to return to their original state. The vertical farm would also create new employment opportunities for the expanding populations of urban centers, certain in which abandoned properties could become productive once again. (6)Moreover, vertical farms would produce crops that contain no added chemicals. The farms would greatly reduce air pollution, since they would eliminate the need for heavy farm machines and trucks that deliver food from farm to fork. Think how great it would be if everything on your plate came from around the corner, rather than from hundreds or thousands of miles away. The structures themselves would be things of beauty and grace. In order to allow plants to capture sunlight, walls and ceilings would be completely transparent. So from a distance, it would look as if there were gardens suspended in space. (7)While experimental vertical farming projects in the US and the UK have shown very positive results thus far, it is important to bear in mind that the science of vertical farming still has a long way to go. To be successful in the long term, vertical farming will still need to prove that it is economically efficient, especially with respect to energy and urban land costs. 本文の原文→http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/opinion/24Despommier.html?_r=1&
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 全文を日本語に訳してください。よろしくお願いします
Each year, millions of tourists visit Australia to see the cute and unique koala, yet its numbers continue to decrease due to trees being cleared for farming and housing. Australia has one of the highest land clearing rates in the world, with over 80 percent of the koala habitat already having disappeared. The protection of this mammal is a national priority not only because it is important for the tourism industry, but also because it represents the richness of Australia`s natural resources. Scientists state that the koala is a "flagship" species for other lesser-known parts of the ecosystem. In other words, if its population decreases, this means that the rest of the ecosystem is in trouble. Protecting koalas and their habitats means protecting many other animal and plant species that exist within the same ( ). （ ）に適切な単語を同じ段落から補ってください。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
お礼
ご回答、ありがとうございます、大変勉強になりました。土地は、内容的には農地としての利用なのですが…ちょっと考えてみます。参考にさせて頂きます。