記事の翻訳お願いします。
家族についての話だと思うのですが、上手く英訳することができず、困っています。
長文ですが翻訳お願いします。
You will hear a lot about the American family in the election campaign. For most of us, that calls up an image of a man and wife and two or three children. Forget it. Predominant as the social pattern for several hundred years, that American family has lost its place. Households of unmarried couples and households without children outnumber "American family" households. And only about 20 percent of families fit into the traditional structure with father as the only breadwinner.
Here is what has been happening: In the 1950s, 80 percent of adults were married; today, roughly 50 percent are. Why? Partly because people are delaying marriage, with the median age for a first marriage rising by four years for men and about five years for women. Second, divorce rates have more than doubled since the 1960s as marriage evolved from a sacrament to a contract. Third, millions more cohabit before marriage. Fourth, births to unmarried mothers, white and black, have risen from 5 percent in 1960 to about 35 percent today. So the new American family is a household with fewer children, with both parents working, and with mothers giving birth to their children at an ever older age, having fewer children, and spacing them further apart.
This is not good news. Twice as many married people indicate they are very happy as compared with those who aren't married. But it is the children who are most affected. The stable family of two biological parents—surprise, surprise!—turns out to be the ideal vessel for molding character, for nurturing, for inculcating values, and for planning for a child's future. By comparison, the children of single parents or broken families do worse at school and in their career. Marriage, or the lack of it, is the best single predictor of poverty, greater even than race or unemployment.
The result is a serious new divide in our society between the children of poorer, less educated, single parents and those of richer, better educated, and married parents. The married parents typically earn more than $75,000; in only 20 percent of cases do married parents with children earn less than $15,000.
The startling increase of those who grow up with only one parent has markedly added to poverty among children, shifting poverty from the old to the young. Children in mother-only families are more likely than those with two parents to be suspended from school, to have emotional problems, to become delinquent, to suffer from abuse, to take drugs, and to perform poorly on virtually every measure.
お礼
回答ありがとうございます。上のURLにも書いてありますね川口とコリカの一対一。それだけでも随分ありがたかったです。さらに知りたいことして、この一対一の結果、ボールがどのように移動して、（私がこの記事を解釈したように本当に）コーナーキックになったのか、そして、そのコーナッキックの結果は私の記事解釈と一致するか、等の細かいことまでは、さすがに書いていませんでした。しかし、そこまで経緯を詳述しているURLってないですよね。このたびは、ご回答いただきありがとうございました。
補足
いろいろ詳しい方に聞いたので、だいぶ語句の意味が確定してきて、今では、訳を次と、考えはじめています。ありがとうございました。 「川口の自分の守備位置からの飛び出しが間に合い、（コリカが蹴る）至近距離8メートルから右ゴールポスト方向へのシュートを（川口が体にあてて）コーナーキックになんとか逃れた。 そのコーナーキックから激しい争奪戦となったが前方へのクリアが二回あり、豪州チームは得点できなかった。」