- ベストアンサー
日本語訳求む！
Animals pollinate about one out of every three bites of food we eat. 訳してほしいです。お願いします。
- みんなの回答 （2）
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
その他の回答 (1)
- wind-sky-wind
- ベストアンサー率63% (6647/10387)
関連するQ&A
- 和訳をお願いします
和訳をお願いします All across the United States, honeybees are flying away from their hives and dying.Empty hives are causing a lot of worry about some important food crops. Bees give us a lot more than delicious honey. They are pollinators―they enable plants to produce the fruits and nuts we enjoy by carrying pollen from one plant or flower to the next. The wind pollinates oats,corn,and wheat,but many other plants(like apple and cherry trees and melon vines)depend on insects,bats,and birds. Animals pollinate about one out of every three bites of food we eat. And in the U.S.,millions and millions of bees kept by human beekeepers fly around doing a lot of this important work for food crops. Professional beekeepers raise honeybees,box them up,and send them on trucks to fields where farmers grow food. Bees live in groups of about 40,000 individuals called colonies. California's almond crop alone depends on about half the bees in the country,about 1.5 million colonies!
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 日本語訳がうまくできません。
日本語訳で困ってます。だれか教えてください。お願いします。 (1)Today, with the stresses of everyday life, nearly one out of every three adults suffers from high blood pressure. 今日、日常生活でのストレスで、までは訳せるんですが、，の後がうまく訳せません。 教えてください。 (2)High blood pressure can be brought on by a fight with one's spouse, problems at work, speaking in public, or even telling a lie. 高血圧は配偶者？が・・・ うまく訳せません。だれか教えてください。 (3)But it can also be brought on by something you enjoy, like the caffeine in a cup of coffee, cigarettes, or alcohol. ，の後は訳せるんですが、Butからが訳せません。教えてください。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 日本語訳について
いつもお世話になっております。２点ございます。英語教育の専門書を読んでいるのですが， （１）章タイトルの Challenging Conceptions of Grammar のchallengingのうまい訳がありますでしょうか？ （２） I do so motivated by my convictions that we language educators have to change the way we think about the elements of language, ... のI do so motivated ですが，なぜam ではなくdoなのでしょうか？ よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 日本語訳お願いします
よくわかりません。日本語に訳してください。よろしくお願いします。 When we use terms such as "lose's one's virginity" in referring to adult sex acts with children instead of calling it "rape," or when we say that teachers "have affairs" with their pupils instead of saying that the teachers sexually exploit them, the only beneficiaries are the predators who target children. This is not about political correctness. It is about telling the truth. In any culture, language is the undercurrent that drives the river of public perception. That undercurrent has been polluted for too long. If we really want to protect our children, it's time to watch our language. When it comes to child abuse, the language we use can distort the reality of the crime and create a roadblock to justice. The next time you hear a news report, keep in mind what the following terms actually mean … and the consequences of the conduct described.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英語の訳をお願いします!!
Huge number of unknown plants and animalsare also in danger.The earth, according to various estimates, supports between 5 million and 80 million species. Of these, scientists have found and named only about 1.5 million. 'Species,' says Dr.Lovejoy, 'are disappearing before we have a chance to learn how they might benefit the rest of the planet.' Thousands of kind of tropical plants could help feed a growing world population. About four out of every ten prescription medicines come from ingredients found in plants. Some animals also provide medicines.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の日本語訳をお願いしたいです
Search the Web to find complete details about the Healthy Eating Pyramid. Make a list of the food types and features of the USDA Food Pyramid and Healthy Eating Pyramid and compare them item by item. What are the similarities? What are the significant differences? Do you find that your lifestyle conforms with either of them? 以上の文を訳したいと思っていますが英語が得意では無いので困っています。どうぞよろしくお願いしますm(_ _)m
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 日本語訳お願いします。急いでます。
Animals in the wild lead lives of compulsion and necessity within an unforgiving social hierarchy in an environment where the supply of fear is high and the supply of food low and where territory must constantly be defended and parasites forever endured. Animals in the wild are, in practice, free neither in spase nor in time, nor in their personal relations. In theory an animal could pick up and go, defying all the social conventions and boundaries proper to its species. But such an event is less likely to happen than for a member of our own species, say a shopkeeper with all the usual ties ― to family, to friends, to society ― to drop everything and walk away from his life with only the spare change in his pockets and the clothes on his frame. If human beings, boldest and most intelligent of creatures, won't wander from place to place, why would an animal, which is by temperament far more conservative? For that is what animals are, conservative, one might even say reactionary. The smallest changes can upset them. They want things to be just so, day after day, month after month. Surprises are highly disagreeable to them. You see this in their spatial relations? An animal inhabits its space, whether in a zoo or in the wild, 'in the same way chess pieces move about a chessboard. There is no more happenstance, no more "freedom," involved in the whereabouts of a lizard or a bear or a deer than in the location of a knight on a chessboard. Both speak of pattern and purpose.In the wild, animals stick to the same paths for the same pressing reasons, season after season. In a zoo, if an animal is not in its normal place in its regular posture at the usual hour, it means something. Animals are territorial. That is the key to their minds. Only a familiar territory will allow them to fulfill the two relentless imperatives of the wild:the avoidance of enemies and the getting of food and water. A biologically sound zoo enclosure is just another territory, peculiar only in its size and in its proximity to human territory. Such an enclosure is subjectively neither better nor worse for an animal than its condition in the wild;so long as it fulfills the animal's needs, a territory, natural or constructed, simply is, without judgment, a given, like the spots on a leopard. One might even argue that if an animal could choose with intelligence, it would opt for living in a zoo, since the major difference between a zoo and the wild is the absence of parasites and enemies and the abundance of food in the first, and their respective abundance and scarcity in the second. Think about it yourself. Would you rather be put up at the Ritz Hotel with free room service and unlimited access to a doctor or be homeless without a soul to care for you? But animals are incapable of such discernment. Within the limits of their nature, they make do with what they have.
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 日本語訳をお願いいたします。
During the advance across the Sinai, although it was established that horses did better with two drinks a day instead of three, the volume remained the same. Supplying the infantry and mounted divisions was a vast undertaking, as one brigade (and there were six involved in the attack on Gaza) of light horse, mounted rifles, and yeomanry at war establishment consisted of approximately 2,000 soldiers as well as the division of infantry; all requiring food and drink, clothing, ammunition and tools, etc. Transport was organised, combining the horse-drawn and mule-drawn supply columns with the camel trains, to support Eastern Force operating beyond railhead for about 24 hours. "The wagons [of the Anzac Mounted Division] with their teams of mules, two in the pole and three in the lead, [were] driven by one man from the box." These wagons and mules were so successful that the five-mule team was "laid down for the Egyptian Expeditionary Force ... ultimately almost supersed[ing] the British four or six horse ride-and-drive team."
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 日本語訳を! 3-(3)
お願いします。 There are challenges to living in a country that is mostly desert. By the time the Old Kingdom rolled around, about 2700 BCE, Egyptians were up to meeting those challenges―the most obvious would concern water. Although the derert continually tried to push in on the farmland along the edge of the Nile, the Egyptians had learned how to push back. They coaxed the waters of the Nile inland, filling the buckets of their shadufs and emptying them into channels they had dug through their gardens. Not only were they irrigating their farmlands, they were expanding them. Farmers grew more food than the people could possibly eat. The king's granaries filled. The government organized and financed massive irrigation projects. When you grow more food than you can possibly eat you are left with something to trade with other nations―grain. What Egyptians didn't have they could now get through trade. A challenge less obvious to those nnt used to surviving in a desert environment is the lack of wood. There are no tall trees in a desert. Actually, there are no trees at all, with the exception of what grew right along the edge of the Nile and in the occasional oasis. Egyptians needed wood―a lot of wood―especially for boats and coffins. They had their eye on the cedar that grew to the northeast, in the land that we now call Lebanon. It was ideal for both boats and coffins because cedar resists rot, and a rotting boat or a rotting coffin can be a problem. And so it began―we've got grain, we need wood, you've got wood, you need grain, let's trade. It was not much different, in principle, from trading baseball cards.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
