- ベストアンサー
英文訳を教えて下さい
but that no man-made differences of class , caste,and subjection were to be added to those that nature had made.
- tennou4805
- お礼率0% (0/33)
- 英語
- 回答数2
- ありがとう数0
- みんなの回答 （2）
- 専門家の回答
関連するQ&A
- 英文解釈について:That there was 〜
添付ファイル文章: That there was no law of nature that man should love mankind, and that, if there had been any love on earth hitherto, it was not owing to a natural law, but simply because men have believed in immortality. Ivan Fyodorovitch added in parenthesis that the whole natural law lies in that faith, and that if you were to destroy in mankind the belief in immortality, not only love but every living force maintaining the life of the world would at once be dried up. に関する質問です。 1. That there was no law of のThat は接続詞として、 前文から引き継いで、「要するに」 という使われた方をしているという理解で合っているのか自信がないです。 2 and that, if there hadとand that if you were のthat はand that で、「しかも、その上」 という使われ方をしているという理解で合っているのか自信がないです。 3. if you were to destroy in mankind the belief in immortality, 「もし、我々が不滅/永遠への信仰を捨て去るようなことがあれば、」と in mankind をどのように解釈すればいいのか分かりません。位置的に変なところにあるように感じ、どこを修飾している語なのかよくわからないです。 belief の後にin mankind とすると 「人類への信仰、信念」となって 理解しづらい表現を解消するための並びなのかな？と疑問です。 この見立てが合っているのかも自信がないです。 「人類において、/人類における永遠への信仰を捨て去るなことがあれば」 のように理解してあっているのか自信がないです。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文についての質問です。
To understand Omphalos, we must begin with a paradox. The argument that strata and fossils were created all at once with the earth, and only present an illusion of elapsed time, might be easier to appreciate if its author had been an urban armchair theologian with no feeling or affection for nature's works. But how could a keen naturalist, who had spent days, nay months, on geological excursions, and who had studied fossils hour after hour, learning their distinctions and memorizing their names, possibly be content with the prospect that these objects of his devoted attention had never existed--were, indeed, a kind of grand joke perpetrated upon us by the Lord of All? (Adam's navel by Stephen Jay Gould) 1) The argument that strata and fossils were created all at once with the earth, and only present an illusion of elapsed time, might be easier to appreciate if its author had been an urban armchair theologian with no feeling or affection for nature's works. might be easier to appreciateのappreciateの意味の取り方を教えてください。 認識する？高く評価する？いろいろあってピタッとくるものを選ぶのが難しいです。 また、might beの主語はThe argument that strata and fossilsですか？ if its author had been an urban armchair theologian with no feeling or affection for nature's works.で、with no feeling or affection for nature's worksと言っているのはなぜですか？ 2）But how could a keen naturalist, who had spent days, nay months, on geological excursions, and who had studied fossils hour after hour, learning their distinctions and memorizing their names, possibly be content with the prospect that these objects of his devoted attention had never existed--were, indeed, a kind of grand joke perpetrated upon us by the Lord of All? 長くて全体の意味を掴むのが大変なのですが、a keen naturalistが主語だと思いますが、それに対する動詞はbe contentのbeになるのでしょうか？ --wereの主語は何になるのでしょうか？ possiblyから英文の構造がよくわからなくなってしまいました。 どのようになっているのでしょうか？ よろしくお願いいたします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文解釈に困っています
(1)The greeks, great as they were, had some shortcomings. 真ん中のところがよくわかんないです。 (2)That may be your opinion, but the others think differently. Thatが何を指しているのかよくわかないんです。それはあなたの意見になりうる？？？ (3)I was surprised at how easy the President was to talk to. to talk toがよくわかりません。 どうか教えていただけないでしょうか。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の訳をお願いします。
僕に海外の友人が英語について教えてくれているのですが、詳しく知りたいので力を貸して頂けると有り難いです。よろしくお願いします。 * If you say "it does not serve as a bed" that typically means that it is not able to be used as a bed. In the next sentence you mention that sometimes you like to sleep in it, so a better way to describe what you're saying could be... "A kotatsu will serve as a table, but it's not intended to be used as a bed." This way you're saying that it's not supposed to be a bed, but you could use it that way if you really wanted to. * I wasn't sure if this is what you were trying to say so I guessed.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の和訳をお願いします！
I’d always have the feeling that you had be en taking a chance just on that, and that kind of love would be disappearing. というのと、 Then I’d always feel that you kept on writing to me only because you were lonely and had no one else. この2つです！ 和訳お願いします！
- 締切済み
- 英語
- happy-to-be-alive の意味(訳)を教えて下さい。
以下の文中の、happy-to-be-alive の訳をお願いします。 excite の翻訳では意味不明の訳でした…… He was in the first third gradeclass I taught at Saint Mary's School in Morris, Minn. All 34 of my students were dear to me,but Mark Eklund was one in a million. Very neat in appearance,but had that happy-to-be-alive attitude that made even his occasional mischieviousness delightful.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文訳お願いします No３
長いので4つに分けました! The research suggests that consumers lose around ￡1.2 billion every year. On average victims have a higher chance than non-victims of falling for another scam within 12 months of first being caught out, because their personal details are added to so-called 'sucker list' of people who have been taken in; the list is then sold to other scammers. While the elderly were more likely to be targeted by a scam, the highest percentage of vibtims were, surprisingly, aged between 35 and 44. Of those who fell for the scams, 32 percent said it was because of the legitimate and professional style of the communication, 25 percent said they were caught off guard, and 18 percent because of excitement at the prospect of getting a good deal or winning a prize. The research also highlighted the fact that whilst men and women are equally likely to be victims of scams, women are more likely to fall victim to miracle health scams and career opportunity scams, while men are more likely to lose money to investment scams and lottery scams. Most strikingly, the study found that less than five percent of those scammed reported their experience to the authorities, so the scale of the problem is far greater than had hitherto been thought. すいませんが 英文訳をお願いします!!
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の訳を教えてください
Computers, the Internet and emai have made many people's lives much faster.This can be very exciting, but it also means that people feel under a lot of pressure to do everything more puickly. のbut からの feel 以下の文の構造を踏まえた訳を教えてください。 子どもの教材ですが、 feel 以下が目的語になっているのかと思うのですが、よくわかりません。よろしくお願いいたします。
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 日本語訳を!!
お願いします (7) Tiberius was elected a tribune of the people in 133 BCE. This office was first established to protect the plebeians, but later tribunes used it to advance their own careers. And as soon as Tiberius took office, he set to work for the rights of the plebes. The aristocrats in the Senate claimed that he was interested only in his own glory, but Tiberius denied it. He said that a trip through northern Italy had showed him how desperate the peasants really were. “The men who fight and die for Italy have only air and light. Without house or home, they wander with their wives and children in the open air.... They fight and die for the luxury and riches of others.” Tiberius insisted that Rome should give the land it gained through war to the poor. Conquered territory became state land. Technically, it belonged to Rome, but if wealthy citizens paid a small tax, they were allowed to farm it as their own. In this way most of the conquered territory passed into the hands of those who needed it least─the rich. Some aristocrats, including many senators, got tens of thousands of acres in this way. They used slave labor to work the land and made huge profits. (8) Tiberius made up his mind to change this law. He proposed that no one─no matter who his ancestors were─should be allowed to keep more than 300 acres of state land. The rest should be given to the poor. Once the homeless had land, he reasoned, they would be able to support themselves. They would no longer roam the cities in angry, hungry mobs. And, as landowners, they would be eligible to serve in the army. This would help the people, help the army, and help Rome─a “win” for everyone. But most of the senators stood against Tiberius, and it's easy to see why. His proposed law would rob them of the huge profits that they had enjoyed for so long.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 日本語訳を!!
お願いします (8) The plebs still complained that there were no written laws. And a poor-but-free man whoowed money could still be forced into slavery if he couldn't pay his debts. So the plebs left the city again about 450 BCE. This protest finally convinced the Senate to create a written set of laws: the Twelve Tables. These laws set down, in writing, the accepted practices of the day. They didn't get to the root of the trouble between patricians and the discontented poor. The poor were still not treated as equals to the landowning rich. But the Twelve Tables were, at least, a start. (9) The twelve Tables were completed in 450 BCE. At some point─no one knows exactly when─they were inscribed on 12 bronze tables that were set up in the Forum for everyone to see. About a third of these early laws have survived because they were copied down by later writers. The others have been lost. The laws that we know about cover all sorts of crimes and conditions. Table 7, for example, decreed that if a road was not in good condition, a man could legally drive his oxen across someone else's fields. Table 8 dealt with a more serious question: whether a homeowner had the right to kill a burglar who broke into his house. According to Roman law, he did─but only if the burglar came at night or if a daytime burglar was armed and tried to defend himself. (10) Many of the laws make sense. For example, a property owner could be forced to trim his trees so that his neighbors would get sunlight. And if someone stole money, he could not be forced to repay more than three times the amount that he stole. But others seem incredibly harsh: for example,capital punishment for a person who sang an insulting song or lied in court. But all Roman citizens had the right to appeal to the Assembly to reverse a death sentence.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
