- 締切済み
デイリー読売
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/editorial/T111206005029.htm の記事中で However, if the amount to be saved shrinks, it will be impossible to make ends meet. The consumption tax revenue must also be used for funds to raise the government's share of contributions to the basic pension fund from the current one-third to half. Therefore, a revenue shortfall is possible even if the consumption tax rate is made 10 percent. To what extent can the government and ruling parties' discussions within the reform headquarters improve each measure in ways that will serve the nation's interest from a broad perspective? We urge Noda to take the initiative, living up to his remark, "I will be in the vanguard position to lead discussions." という文の和訳ができません。 どなたか分かる方いらっしゃいませんか？
- k_fisung
- お礼率13% (12/86)
- 英語
- 回答数1
- ありがとう数0
- みんなの回答 （1）
- 専門家の回答
みんなの回答
- SPS700
- ベストアンサー率46% (15295/33014)
しかしながら、貯蓄出来る余裕が少なくなれば、収入内では生活出来なくなる。消費税からの収入は、基本年金基金の政府負担額を現在の三分の一から半分に上げるためにも使わなくてはならない。このため、消費税率を１０％にしても国庫納入額は不足する可能性がある。 改革本部での政府与党会談がどの程度にまで、広い視野で国益に役立てられるように各方策を改善することが出来るだろうか？ 我々は、「私は先頭に立って話し合いをリードして行く」と野田自身が言ったように首相がイニシアティブを取ることを促すものである。
関連するQ&A
- デイリー読売
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/editorial/T111026004197.htm の記事中で There can be no objection to the idea of using taxes to a certain degree to support domestic agriculture, which plays an important role in providing nutritious food for the nation's dining tables. However, the government cannot devote abundant funds to this end due to its troubled fiscal situation. It is necessary for the government to limit the budget for the purpose. という英文の和訳が出来ません。 どなたか分かる方ご教授願います。
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 文法が正しいか見てください。m(＿ ＿)m
↓文章が2つあるのですが、両方確認して頂きたいです。 <The consumption tax> Japanese consumption tax is 5%. Sweden is a country where a consumption tax is the 2nd highest country in the world, and 5 times of Japan. Iceland is a country where a consumption tax is the highest. It is 25.5%. There are three kinds of consumption taxes of Sweden. The highest tax rates of them are 25%. A publication and public traffic are 6% and food is the tax rates of 12%. But, Japan has not divided the consumption tax like Sweden. The tax rates of Sweden are higher than Japan, so social welfare is substantial than Japan. <History of the tax> Third, I’m going to talk about history of the tax. Japan was started the consumption tax in 1989. At first, it was 3%. Later, it changed 5% in 1997. Then, it is still 5%. But, it will go up in the future. Sweden was started the consumption tax in 1960. The consumption tax of Sweden changed 10 times in 30 years, and became 25% from 4.2%. Therefore, the consumption tax of Japan did not large change. But, the consumption tax of Sweden changed a lot.
- 締切済み
- 英語
- デイリー読売
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/editorial/T111026004197.htm の記事中で Under a taxpayer-burden policy, when farm product prices decline due to cuts in tariffs and the abolition of production adjustment measures, farmers will be directly compensated with subsidies for the amount of the decline. European countries and South Korea have adopted this kind of policy in tandem with the liberalization of their markets. という英文の和訳がうまく出来ません。 どなたか分かる方ご教授願います。
- 締切済み
- 英語
- riseとraiseについて
Many people are trying to buy a house before the consumption tax［ ］ in April. (1)is raised (2) is risen (3) will be risen (4) will raise 解答は「選択肢は受け身（be動詞＋過去分詞）になっています。受け身は（上げられる）だから、自動詞riseは使えません。よって答えは(1)」 と書いてあるのですが、(1)の他動詞のraiseだと目的語を取らないといけなくて、英文には前置詞inがあるので自動詞riseの(2)か(3)じゃないといけない気がするのですが、なんでなのでしょうか？
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 和訳で困っています。
変な訳になってしまうため内容がつかめません。正確な和訳にしたいので手伝ってください。この英文は税について書かれています。 (1)Options do exist to reduce or eliminate this regressivity; three possible methods are exclusions and multiple rates, income tax credits, and earmarking of some revenue for increased social spending. (2)If consumption over either a one year period or a lifetime is the measure of ability to pay, abroad based VAT (a value added tax) with a single rate would be proportional; that is, the percentage of consumption paid in VAT would be same as consumption increases. (1)この逆進性を取り除いたり減らしたりする選択肢として、増大する社会支出のための除外、複数のレート、所得税控除、いくつかの収入といった方法があります。 (2) もし一年間の消費や生涯の消費が単率VATにおける支払い能力を計る手段になるなら、VATにおける消費の割合は消費の増大と同じになるだろう。
- 締切済み
- 英語
- "in 2007-08" の読み方を教えて・・
次は、Economist の一文です。 The Treasury is forecasting that total revenues will rise from 38.3% of GDP in 2004-05 to 40.4% in 2007-08 (see chart). Crucially, this rise in the tax burden is supposed to occur without the pain of tax-raising measures. この中の、"in 2007-08" の読み方が自信ありません。 "in 2007 to 8" なのか、"in 2007 to 2008" なのか、それ以外なのか、教えてください。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 至急翻訳お願いします。
Taxation differs from country to country. For example,in the United States and Japan, a tax on cigarettes and alcohol is an important way for the government to get money. This is sometimes called a "sintax."In other words, by doing something bad, you do something good: You give money to the government. Yet in Russia, there is almost no tax on,tobacco or alcohol.
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 翻訳してください。
Taxation differs from country to country. For example, in the United States and Japan, a tax on cigarettes and alcohol is an important way for the government to get money. This is sometimes called a "sin tax." In other words, by doing something bad, you do something good: You give money to the government. Yet in Russia, there is almost no tax on tobacco or alcohol. It is often said that taxes will change in the 21st century. There may be new taxes on bank savings and financial transactions. Trash is likely to be taxed in the future. When you drive your car into a large city, you might have to pay a tax for that. One thing is certain: There will be new taxes for the rich and poor in countries that have fewer and fewer young people to support society. If you like to save money, you might be penalized for this in the future. This would encourage people not to hold money, but spend it. This might be important in societies such as Japan, where people traditionally save large amounts of money. A strong economy is one in which money changes hands often. Money "grows" in this way. When you go overseas, you usually exchange yen for another currency, such as dollars or the euro. Not only are tourists a good target for a tax(because it is thought that they have money to spend), but it would help to stop speculators. Speculators are people with large amounts of money who buy one currency, hold it, and then sell it to make money. Imagine that somebody exchanges \10,000,000 at 92 yen per dollar. If he changes this money back to yen at just 93 yen to a dollar, then he has made about \100,000. Any government would love to get some of this profit.
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 【英語翻訳】文法的説明もお願いします。
I earnestly urge all young people contemplating their careers to keep in mind that nothing in work is finally rewarding unless it is work you would be willing to for nothing if you could afford to. お願いします。 特に、that nothing in work is finally rewarding unless it is work～らへんがよくわかりません・・・
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英語の質問です。
下の文章は結局何が比例するということなのでしょうか？付加価値税に支払われる消費税の割合と消費税の増大が比例するということになるのでしょうか？それとも付加価値税と消費税とが比例するということなのでしょうか？わからないので教えてください。あとproportionalの後ろには「tax rate」や「tax system」が省略されているようなきがします。 If consumption over either a one year period or a lifetime is the measure of ability to pay, abroad based VAT with a single rate would be proportional; that is, the percentage of consumption paid in VAT would be same as consumption increases. もし単年における消費税や生涯における消費税が支払能力の尺度になるならば、単一の利率の適用範囲の広い付加価値税は比例するだろう、つまり付加価値税に支払われる消費税の割合は消費税の増大と同じになるだろう。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
