国際社会の形成とは?

このQ&Aのポイント
  • ヨーロッパの伝統において、国際法や自然法の普遍的な考えが、ギリシャ人と野蛮人、キリスト教徒と異教徒、ヨーロッパ人と非ヨーロッパ人の間の人間の根本的な区分の教義によって争われた。
  • 最も重要なことは、任意の2つの地域国際システムを超える境界を介して運営する単一の合意体系と制度体系が存在しなかったことである。
  • 国際社会とは、世界全体という意味での国際社会を指す。
回答を見る
  • ベストアンサー

至急この英文の和訳をお願い致しますm(><)m

In the European tradition ideas of a universal law of nations or law of nature were contested by doctrines of a fundamental division of humanity between Greeks and barbarians,Christians and infidels,Europeans and non-Europeans. Most importantly,there was no single,agreed body of rules and institutions operating across the boundaries of any two regional international systems,let alone thoughout the world as a whole,such as we imply when we speak of an international society. よろしくお願いします

  • 英語
  • 回答数3
  • ありがとう数3

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • SPS700
  • ベストアンサー率46% (15295/33014)
回答No.2

 ヨーロッパでの伝統は、国家の普遍的法、あるいは自然法の観念は、ギリシャ人対野蛮人、クリスチャン対邪教信者、ヨーロッパ人対非ヨーロッパ人、という基本的に人類を二分する論理によって争っていた。最も重要なのは、我々が(今日)国際社会と言う場合のような、世界全体に通用するどころか、(隣接する)二つの地域的国際組織の境界を越えて通用する、お互いに理解された単一の法とか機関さえも存在しなかったと言うことである。

taiyaki_5
質問者

お礼

わかりやすい回答ありがとうございます!

その他の回答 (2)

  • wyeatearp
  • ベストアンサー率43% (110/254)
回答No.3

【欧州の伝統においては国際法あるいは自然法の概念は人間をギリシャ人と蛮族、キリスト教徒と異教徒、欧州人と非欧州人を基本的に分割してかかる教義の争うとろだった。もっとも重要なことは、地域的な国際組織の境界を越えて機能すべき単一かつ合意された法と組織、いわんや今日われわれが語る汎世界的な国際組織などは存在しなかったことである。】 ご参考まで。

taiyaki_5
質問者

お礼

本当ありがとうございます!感謝致しますm(__)m!

  • hiro7th
  • ベストアンサー率0% (0/1)
回答No.1

もともとの内容が難しいですね。分かりやすく解釈できませんが 訳すと↓ == ここから == 国か天理の普遍的な法のヨーロッパの伝統考えでは、ギリシア人と野蛮人の間の人類クリスチャン、不信心者、ヨーロッパ人、および非ヨーロッパ人の基本的な分割の主義で、争われました。 私たちが国際社会について話すとき、最も重要に、私たちが暗示するように、規則と団体の同意されたボディーがどんな2台の地方の国際的なシステム、まして、thoughoutの境界の向こう側にも全体で世界を経営であっている中の単一のそのようなものがあったというわけではありません。 == ここまで ==

taiyaki_5
質問者

お礼

素早い回答ありがとうございます!感謝ですm(__)m

関連するQ&A

  • 至急この英文の和訳をお願い致しますm(*_*)m

    In this era preceding the emergence of a universal international society, what assumptions were made about the relationsbetween states or rulers that belonged to different regional international syrtems, as opposed to the much more intimate and continuous relations among states or rulers within the same system?This question has an important bearing on our study.We do not kmow enough to be able to provide a comprehensive answer to it,but certain things can be said.It is clearthat states or rulers have commonly enough entered into agreements with states or rulers-and indeed with merchants and other individuals and groups - outside their own regiomal international system and the civilization with which it is associated.

  • この英文の和訳をお願い致しますm(**)m

    Nor should it be overlooked that the European states, as they evolved this non-hegemonial system in their relations with one another,at the same time established a number of empires which,while they were rival and competing,taken together amounted to a European hegemony over the rest of the world,which in the nineteenth century became an immense periphery looking to a European centre. Moreover,the non-hegemonial system among the Europeans themselves was evolved only slowly,and with great difficulty,after 1500. よろしくお願い致します

  • この英文の和訳をお願い致しますm(**)m

    However,it was never the case,before Europe unified the globe,that relations between states or rulers that were members of different regional international systems could be conducted on the same moral and legal basis as relations within the same system,for this basis was provided in part by principles that were culturally particular and exclusive: the unity of Christendom, the community of the faithful in Islam, the conception of the Chinese Empire as the Middle Kingdom. よろしくお願いします

  • 和訳をお願いします。

    以下の文の和訳をお願いします。 For non-Europeans, securing a work permit can take three months, so the labor law is a huge help, said Michael I. Glenn, CH2M Hill’s director of international operations. “These programs and projects that we do are of a scale that we have to move our expertise around,” he said. Continental Europe provides a nearby pool of potential employees with the qualifications needed to work in Britain, added Andrea Laws, the company’s director of international recruitment.

  • この英文の和訳をお願い致しますm(*_*)m

    Among the regiomal international syrtems into which the world was divided that which evolved in Europe was distinctive in that it came to repudiate any hegemonial principle and regard itself as a society of states that were sovereign or independent. This non-hegemonial society was not without historical precedent:the city states of classical Greece,the Hellenistic Kingdoms between the death of Alexander and the Roman conquest, perhaps the 'period of warring states' in ancient China,may all be thought to provide examples.

  • 英文和訳をお願いします。

    German East Africa (Deutsch-Ostafrika) was colonized by the Germans in 1885. The territory itself spanned 384,180 square miles (995,000 km2) and covered the areas of modern-day Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania.The colony's indigenous population numbered seven and a half million and was governed by just 5,300 Europeans. Although the colonial regime was relatively secure, the colony had recently been shaken by the Maji Maji Rebellion of 1904-5 whose effects were still being felt by 1914. The German colonial administration could call on a military Schutztruppe (Protection force) of 260 Europeans and 2,470 Africans, in addition to 2,700 white settlers who were part of the reservist Landsturm, as well as a small paramilitary Gendarmerie.

  • 至急この英文の和訳をお願い致しますm(*_*)m

    Societies which recognize that pacta sunt servanda among their own members,do not find it difficult to recognize the advantages of fulfilling obligations and contacts in dealings with individuals and groups in different societies.The fact that all societies appear to recognize that there is an obligation to fulfil contacts,alongwith prudential advantage in fulfilling them (just as,it is often argued,they all recognize rules that limit violence among their members and enjoin respect for rights of property) provides a basis for the extension of the principle of the sanctity of contracts beyond the bounds of particular societies.

  • 英文和訳お願いします

    調べてみたのですが自分ではわからなくて困っています。 We observe today not a victory of party but a celebration of freedom symbolizing an end as well as a beginning signifying renewal as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemnoath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago. お願いします。

  • 和訳お願い致します。

    こんにちは。 和訳をしていたのですが、どう訳せば自然な日本語になるのか分からず、 止まってしまっています。和訳宜しくお願い致します。 本文:As a designer of clothing and what we call fashion, we must readapt our approach entirely to a world spiraling into chaos by a system of human civilization and philosophies that is not working--and whether humanity likes it or not--will change rapidly. 宜しくお願い致します。

  • この英文の和訳をお願いします。

         We evaluated <P(e, 0)> for 12 cases of e between 0 and 6: e=0.0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, 1.0, 1.2, 1.5, 2.0, 4.0, and 6.0. As for r_p, we considered three cases: r_p=0.005, 0.001, and 0.0002. These are representative values of radii of protoplanets at the Earth, Jupiter, and Neptune orbits regions, respectively. The numbers of collision orbits found by our orbital calculation are shown in Table 3 for representative values of e. From Table 3 we can expect the statistical errors in the evaluated collisional rate to be within 5% for the cases of e≦1.5 and within 8% for e=4 and 6; they are smaller than that of the previous studies by Nishida (1983) and by Wetherill and Cox (1985).    The calculated collisional rate is summarized in terms of the enhancement factor defined by Eq. (27) and shown in Fig.11, as a function of e and r_p. From Fig.11 one can see that the collisional rate is always enhanced by the effect of solar gravity, compared with that of the two-body approximation <P(e,0)>_2B. In particular, in regions where e≦1, R(e,0) is almost independent of e, having a value as large as 3. At e≦1, R(e,0) has a notable peak beyond which the enhancement factor decreases gradually with increasing e. For large values of e, i.e., e≧4, <P(e,0)> tends rapidly to <P(e,0)>_2B. As seen in the next section, we will find a similar dependence on e even in the three-dimensional case (i≠0) as long as we are concerned with cases where i≦2. お手数ですが、よろしくお願いします。