ベストアンサー

至急和訳おねがいします!

2013/06/21 01:17

Perhaps the lack of a border sense of alarm is not all that surprising when President Obama, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic chairwoman of the Intelligence Committee, and intelligence officials insist that such surveillance is crucial to the nation’s antiterrorism efforts.

big3king
お礼率9% (4/41)

英語
回答数1
ありがとう数0

みんなの回答 （1）
専門家の回答

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

ベストアンサー

sayshe
ベストアンサー率77% (4555/5904)

2013/06/21 01:37 回答No.1

オバマ大統領、諜報特別委員会の民主党の議長ダイアン・ファインスタイン上院議員、情報当局者が、そのような監視が、同国のテロ対策努力にとって極めて重要であると主張するとき、より幅広い警戒感が欠如していることは、おそらく、それほど驚くべきではないのでしょう。

関連するQ&A

至急和訳お願いします！！！

Surveillance: A Threat to Democracy A new Washington Post-Pew Research Center poll found that a majority of Americans are untroubled by revelations about the National Security Agency’s dragnet collection of the phone records of millions of citizens, without any individual suspicion and regardless of any connection to a counterterrorism investigation. Perhaps the lack of a broader sense of alarm is not all that surprising when President Obama, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic chairwoman of the Intelligence Committee, and intelligence officials insist that such surveillance is crucial to the nation’s antiterrorism efforts. But Americans should not be fooled by political leaders putting forward a false choice. The issue is not whether the government should vigorously pursue terrorists. The question is whether the security goals can be achieved by less-intrusive or sweeping means, without trampling on democratic freedoms and basic rights. Far too little has been said on this question by the White House or Congress in their defense of the N.S.A.’s dragnet. The surreptitious collection of “metadata” — every bit of information about every phone call except the word-by-word content of conversations — fundamentally alters the relationship between individuals and their government
答えられる範囲で構わないので和訳おねがいします

>Surveillance: A Threat to Democracy > A new Washington Post-Pew Research Center poll found that a majority of Americans are untroubled by revelations about the National Security Agency’s dragnet collection of the phone records of millions of citizens, without any individual suspicion and regardless of any connection to a counterterrorism investigation. Perhaps the lack of a border sense of alarm is not all that surprising when President Obama, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic chairwoman of the Intelligence Committee, and intelligence officials insist that such surveillance is crucial to the nation’s antiterrorism efforts. But Americans should not be fooled by political leaders putting forward a false choice. The issue is not whether the government should vigorously pursue terrorists. The question is whether the security goals can achieved by less-intrusive or sweeping means, without tramping on democratic freedoms and basic right .Far too little has been said on this question by the White House or Congress in their defense of the N.S. A.’s dragnet. The surreptitious collection of “metadata”-every bit of information about every phone call except the word-by-word content of conversations ‐fundamentally alters the relationship between individuals and their government.
和訳をお願いします。

和訳をお願いします。 he is on the committee that dates the rise and falls of the business cycle for the national bureau of economic research.
和訳お願いします

Nuclear export of mRNAs is a crucial step in the regulation of gene expression, linking transcription in the nucleus to translation in the cytoplasm. Although important components of the mRNA export machinery are well characterized, such as transcription-export complexes TREX and TREX-2, recent work has shown that, in some instances, mammalian mRNA export can be selective and can regulate crucial biological processes such as DNA repair, gene expression, maintenance of pluripotency, haematopoiesis, proliferation and cell survival. Such findings show that mRNA export is an unexpected, yet potentially important, mechanism for the control of gene expression and of the mammalian transcriptome.
和訳

With language so close to the core of what it means to be human, it is not surprising that children's acquisition of language has received so much attention. という文なんですが、with～humanまでの文章がどう訳してよいか分かりません・・・前から訳していこうとすると、どこで切って読めばよいか分かりません。to the coreという熟語がありますが、この文で適応されるのか、この文の中のcoreとはどういうことなのか分かりません・・・
和訳お願いします！

Taliban Step Toward Afghan Peace Talks Is Hailed by U.S. By MATTHEW ROSENBERG and ALISSA J. RUBIN WASHINGTON — The Taliban signaled a breakthrough in efforts to start Afghan peace negotiations on Tuesday, announcing the opening of a political office in Qatar and a new readiness to talk with American and Afghan officials, who said in turn that they would travel to meet insurgent negotiators there within days. If the talks begin, they will be a significant step in peace efforts that have been locked in an impasse for nearly 18 months, after the Taliban walked out and accused the United States of negotiating in bad faith. American officials have long pushed for such talks, believing them crucial to stabilizing Afghanistan after the 2014 Western military withdrawal. But the Taliban may have other goals in moving ahead. Their language made clear that they sought to be dealt with as a legitimate political force with a long-term role to play beyond the insurgency. In that sense, in addition to aiding in talks, the actual opening of their office in Qatar — nearly a year and a half after initial plans to open it were announced and then soon after suspended — could be seen as a signal that the Taliban’s ultimate aim is recognition as an alternative to the Western-backed government of President Hamid Karzai. By agreeing to negotiations, the Taliban can “come out in the open, engage the rest of the region as legitimate actors, and it will be very difficult to prevent that when we recognize the office and are talking to the office,” said Vali Nasr, a former State Department official who is the dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.
和訳を教えて下さい(´；ω；｀)

In spite of all your child's efforts and desire to become independent and your best efforts to let go ,there may be other forces that complicate or slow your beat-Iaid plans ． Your child may have some persistent problem areas that prevent moving forward ,or you may be trying to handle other stresses in your life (e.g., marital, health, or financial problems) that interfere with your best intentions. There also may be obstacles in the community -a lack of resources or resources or resistant attitudes that make your child's transition into the world outside the parental home a dif-ficult and frustrating experience .
出典を教えてください（ベルクソンとバーナード・ショウの言葉）

　以下の二つの言葉の出典をご存じでしたら教えていただけないでしょうか。　どちらかひとつだけでも良いので、どうぞよろしくお願いいたします。 "It is the emotion which drives the intelligence forward in spite of obstacles." - Henri Bergson “Lack of money is the root of all evil." - George Bernard Shaw
和訳が分かりません。

下記の英文の和訳をお願いします＞＜・It is clear that the starting point for internationalization and the development of a sense of being a world citizen is the attitude each of one of you takes. ・The greater your knowledge and understanding, the more you can contribute, not only by the firmness of your own beliefs, but by your ability to set an example for others. ・No organized system induces people to take the next step to a concern about the world and humanity as a whole, even though ir is now quite evident that the unit of survival is becoming, not the individual country, but the world as a whole. ・It is not at all surprising that the Japanese should have developed one of the most distinctive cultures in the world and particularly strong sense of self-identity.
和訳お願い致します。

The point is that, notwithstanding special difficulties in assigning this or that being to one or the other class, the psychological classification which I advocate resembles the zoological classification which I have cited ; it is a valid classification, inasmuch as it recognizes a distinction where there is certainly something to distinguish. For even if we take the most mechanical view of mental processes that is possible, and suppose that conscious intelligence plays no part whatever in determining action, there still remains the fact that such conscious intelligence exists, and that prior to certain actions it is always affected in certain ways. Therefore, even if we suppose that the state of things is, so to speak, accidental, and that the actions in question would always he performed in precisely the same way whether or not they were thus connected with consciousness, it would still remain desirable, for scientific purposes, that a marked distinction should be drawn between cases of activity that proceed without, and those that proceed with this remarkable association with consciousness. As the phenomena of subjectivity are facts at any rate no less real than those of objectivity, if it is found that some of the latter are invariably and faithfully mirrored in those of the former, such pheno mena, for this reason alone, deserve to be placed in a distinct scientific category, even though it were proved that the mirror of subjectivity might be removed without affecting any of the phenomena of objectivity.
和訳

自信がないのでどなたか教えて下さい Cooke put his summery of Franklin in this way,¨what makes him, after two centuries, not merely impressive but lovable is his absolute lack of arrogance and the steady goodness of his belief that in helping to create the American Republic he was founding a truer order of society. ¨ 長文ですがお願いします「彼をつくったものは」の説明なんでしょうか？
英文と和訳があります。和訳は適切でしょうか？

For example, the Japanese officials dealing with shipwrecked foreigners probably had no idea that the severely limited space, and the lack of explanation, seemed so torturous to the tall strangers they called the "hairy out-siders." They may have felt that the foreigners were better treated than common criminals. 日本語訳例えば、難破した外国人の日本の公式な取り扱いは、厳しく制限された空間（収容された寺などのことだと思います）や、説明の不足が、日本人が毛唐（毛深い外国人）とよぶ、外国人にとって、とても難儀なことであろうということに、考えが及んでいなかったのだ。彼らは外国人たちは通常の罪人よりもよい扱いを受けていると感じただろう
和訳お願いします＞＜

INTELLIGENCE AND AGEING The same thing seems to happen with mental abilities too. For example, intelligence is often inaccurately cited as one of the areas which declines with age. For many years, people 'knew' that various abilities, including intelligence and physical strength, reached their peak in the early twenties, and then declined steadily from then on thoughout a person's life. This knowledge was based on a series of studies, resported by Miles in 1931, which involved measuring various human characteristics in people of different ages. When they plotted the results of these measurements on a graph, Miles found a steady decline: the older the person was, the less strong, or intelligent (as measured by IQtests) or able they were. Other reseachers found similar results, so for a great many years there was a strong belief in an inevitable decline with age. Indeed this belief is still held by a great many people, including some doctors and social workers, but when we look more carefully at the evidence, what we find is actually quite a different picture. Cross-sectional methods The problem was that all of these studies were done using cross-sectional methods. That is, the reseacher tested several different groups of people, or different ages. But someone who was 60 in 1930 had experienced quite a different upbringing and lifestyle from someone who was 20 at that time. Their schooling was quite different, their life experiences were quite different, and their standards of living were different too. The same thing applied to cross-sectional studies that were conducted later on in the education and health care which had taken place. It wasn't surprising, for example, that older people did badly on intelligence tests in the 1960s, when they had experienced an education which consisted, in the main, of leaning large chunks of infomation off by heart. Younger people, by contrast, had experienced a form of education which stressd reasoning and mental skills, and so they naturally performed much better on IQ tests.
和訳お願い致します。

Now assuredly we have here a most important issue, and as it is one the discussion of which will constitute a large element of my work, it is perhaps desirable that I should state at the outset the manner in which I propose to deal with it . The question, then, as to whether or not human intelli gence has been evolved from animal intelligence can only be dealt with scientifically by comparing the one with the other, in order to ascertain the points wherein they agree and the points wherein they differ. Now there can be no doubt that when this is done, the difference between the mental faculties of the most intelligent animal and the mental faculties of the lowest savage[savage=wild beast] is seen to be so vast, that the hypothesis of their being so nearly allied as Mr. Darwin's teaching implies, appears at first sight absurd. And, indeed, it is not until we have become convinced that the theory of Evolution can alone afford an explanation of the facts of human anatomy that we are prepared to seek for a similar explanation of the facts of human psychology. But wide as is the difference between the mind of a man and the mind of a brute, we must remember that the question is one, not as to degree, but as to kind ; and therefore that our task, as serious enquirers after truth, is calmly and honestly to examine the character of the difference which is presented, in order to determine whether it is really beyond the bounds of rational credibility that the enormous interval which now separates these two divisions of mind can ever have been bridged over, by numberless inter mediate gradations, during the untold ages of the past.
和訳お願いします。

The truth is that President Trump’s choppy, rambling self-expression is not so exotic. A great many thoroughly intelligent people talk more like Donald Trump than they might know. What’s new is that someone who talks like this in public has become the president of the United States. Yet it isn’t surprising, and if we are not to spend the next hour to eight years alternating between exasperation and confusion as he sounds off, we need to learn a new way of listening.
和訳がどうしてもわかりません

英文の和訳お願いします!!! Not even the best of schools can educate a child whose will to work has not first been learnt at home. Not even the best of health services can make up for the damage done to a child by a mother's bad care. There are millions of people who prefer the company of animals to people,which is understandable,because animals are far less demanding. When we talk of the cleverness of insects,we ought always to keep in mind that this cleverness is what is called instinctive,and differs considerably from the cleverness of which man is so proud. Perhaps one of the reasons we all have so much difficulty in defining and explaining words is that we continue to think of the dictionary as the final authority about them.
英作文

「彼が息子を自慢するのは最もである」という和文ですが，解答において，may well は現代あまり使われていないとかいてあって，解答例には， It is not surprising that～とあるのですが， It is natural that he is proud of his son. でも言いと思いますか？
英作文チェックしてください！！

Although the reading section claimed that it is possible to evaluate people’s intelligence by simply taking IQ test, the lecture said that human intelligence is too complex to evaluate. First, human intelligence is multiple. There are a variety of intelligence exist in the human world. For example, someone has linguistic intelligence and the other people have mathematical intelligence. Second, all human intelligence are not related each other. As I mentioned, a linguistic intelligence and a mathematical intelligence is totally different type of intelligence. So, it can’t evaluate people by just simple test such as IQ test. In addition, the balance of intelligence is not the same. For example, someone has a high score of IQ test, however, it is not simply connected with mathematical skill. ところでHumana intelligence って可算名詞なんですか？ a linguistic intelligence かlinguistic intelligenceどっちですか？
和訳をよろしくお願いします

Japan also has a low standard of living, because of cramped housing, long and crowded train commutes, a lack of open spaces and recreational facilities for adults and kids alike, and a lack of cultural activities such as world-class museums, world-class live performances, high-quality art, high-quality movies and high-quality music. “Cramped” means uncomfortably restricted in size, or financially. “Open spaces” refers to parks, community gardens, schoolyards, playgrounds, public plazas, and so on. “Alike” is an adverb used to emphasize that the writer is referring to both adults and kids. “World-class” means ranking among the world's best; outstanding.
★至急　英文翻訳

There is an official report that includes some surprising facts. In developed nations,on average, one person uses 1,000 tons of water per year. In japan, one person uses only 700 tons of water per year. The japanese seem to use lees water. However, in japna, one person also uses 600 tons of virtunal water pet year. What is virtanal water ? It is the water that is used to produce a country's imports. The total amount of this virtual water plus domestic water in japan is 1,300 tons per person.

至急和訳おねがいします!

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

関連するQ&A

至急和訳お願いします！！！

答えられる範囲で構わないので和訳おねがいします

和訳をお願いします。

和訳お願いします

和訳

和訳お願いします！

和訳を教えて下さい(´；ω；｀)

出典を教えてください（ベルクソンとバーナード・ショウの言葉）

和訳が分かりません。

和訳お願い致します。

和訳

英文と和訳があります。和訳は適切でしょうか？

和訳お願いします＞＜

和訳お願い致します。

和訳お願いします。

和訳がどうしてもわかりません

英作文

英作文チェックしてください！！

和訳をよろしくお願いします

★至急　英文翻訳

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ
一覧

専門家に質問してみよう
専門家登録

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVE セレクト

至急和訳おねがいします!

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

関連するQ&A

至急和訳お願いします！！！

答えられる範囲で構わないので和訳おねがいします

和訳をお願いします。

和訳お願いします

和訳

和訳お願いします！

和訳を教えて下さい(´；ω；｀)

出典を教えてください（ベルクソンとバーナード・ショウの言葉）

和訳が分かりません。

和訳お願い致します。

和訳

英文と和訳があります。和訳は適切でしょうか？

和訳お願いします＞＜

和訳お願い致します。

和訳お願いします。

和訳がどうしてもわかりません

英作文

英作文チェックしてください！！

和訳をよろしくお願いします

★至急 英文翻訳

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ 一覧

専門家に質問してみよう 専門家登録

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVE セレクト

★至急　英文翻訳

カテゴリ
一覧

専門家に質問してみよう
専門家登録