The Power of Science: A Revolutionary Force

このQ&Aのポイント
  • Science, as a dominant force, has transformed human life in a brief period.
  • Its future effects are still uncertain, but studying its past effects can provide insight.
  • The rise of science to power is recent, and we are just at the beginning of its work.
回答を見る
  • ベストアンサー

英文和訳について。

Man has existed for about a million years. He has possessed writing for about 6,000 years, agriculture somewhat longer, but perhaps not much longer Science, as a dominant factor in determining the beliefs of educated men, has existed for about 300 years; as a source of economic technique, for about 150 years. [In this brief period it has proved itself an incredibly powerful revolutionary force. When we consider how recently it has risen to power, we find ourselves forced to believe that we are at the very beginning of its work in transforming human life. What its future effects will be is a matter of conjecture, but possibly a study of its effects hitherto may make the conjecture a little less risky.] 『手短に言うと、それは信じられないほど強力な革命力で有能である。 私たちがつい最近どのように政権をとってきたかを考えると、人間生活の転換において、私達が仕事の始まりを自分自身に信じさせていることがわかった。その将来の印象となるのは推測することであるが、おそらく、その印象による学習は推測で危険をなくしているかもしれない。』 [ ]の部分の英文だけで結構です。  この英文の訳、及び熟語・構文等の解説をよろしくお願いします。

  • 英語
  • 回答数2
  • ありがとう数2

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
回答No.1

 In this brief period は、  Science, as a dominant factor in determining the beliefs of educated men, has existed for about 300 years; as a source of economic technique, for about 150 years.  の部分を指していると思われます。つまり、「科学は、教養ある人の資格を決定付ける、大きな要素として、およそ300年間存在してきた。また、経済手法の源流としてはおよそ150年だ。」を「この短い間に」と換言して指します。  次に、it has proved itself an incredibly powerful revolutionary force. の it は、Science です。つまり「科学は、驚くほど、強力で革命的な力であることを、自身で証明したのである。」  その後の  When we consider how recently it has risen to power, we find ourselves forced to believe that we are at the very beginning of its work in transforming human life.    における it もずっと、Science です。  「科学が、近年どれほど、影響力を及ぼしてきたかを考慮するにつけ、我々は、その科学が、人間の暮らしを変遷させる過程の最も初期の段階にあると言うことを、信じざるを得ない。」  What its future effects will be is a matter of conjecture, but possibly a study of its effects hitherto may make the conjecture a little less risky. 最後に、ここでも it は、ずっと Science です。  「科学の将来の効果がいかなるものかは、推測の域を出ない。しかし、現在までのその科学の及ぼす効果の研究は、推測なるものの危険性を、幾分和らげはするだろう。」  ちょっと、下手かも知れませんが、こんな訳はいかがでしょう?

kamenoko01
質問者

お礼

回答していただいてどうもありがとうございました。 とてもわかりやすかったです。

その他の回答 (1)

回答No.2

 NO 2 です。  how recently it has risen to power の訳がおかしかったので、訂正します。 「近年どれほど、影響力を及ぼしてきたか」 →「科学の影響がいかに最近になって、大きな力となってきたか」です。つまり How recently の解釈が変でした。

関連するQ&A

  • 英文和訳

    以下の英文を分かりやすい日本語にするとどのようになるでしょうか。 よろしくお願い致します。 This is not a one day thing... this has been building for a while... people have been worried about markets... commodity markets have been doing better but at the moment everything is going down because everybody is afraid of everything. But certainly in the next year or two, we are going to witness terrible sell-off because the world is in terrible trouble... America has quadrupled its debts in the last 3 years overall situation has gotten worse not better.

  • 英文和訳をお願いします。

    オバマ大統領の宇宙計画に関するスピーチ(2010年)の一文です。 But while the measure of our achievements has changed a great deal over the past 50 years, what we do -- or fail to do -- in seeking new frontiers is no less consequential for our future in space and here on Earth. それでも、功績を測る基準は過去50年の間に大きく変わってきたとはいえ、 新境地を求めるためにすること、あるいはしないことは、我々の宇宙とここ地球上の未来のために同様に必要なのである。 ・主語、「--」の考え方について in seeking new frontiers は、what we do、or fail to doにかかっているのでしょうか? → 新境地を求めるにあたり我々がすること、あるいはしないこと それとも、 what we do と in seeking new frontiersは同等で、or fial to doは挿入されているだけなのでしょうか? → 我々がすること、つまり新境地を求めること、あるいはしないこと ・no less consequential 辞書上の意味「結果としておこる、必然の、間接的な、重大な」とどれをとってもしっくりこないのですが、特別な表現なのでしょうか? 以下、抜粋と、全文のURLです。 So today, I’d like to talk about the next chapter in this story. The challenges facing our space program are different, and our imperatives for this program are different, than in decades past. We’re no longer racing against an adversary. We’re no longer competing to achieve a singular goal like reaching the Moon. In fact, what was once a global competition has long since become a global collaboration. But while the measure of our achievements has changed a great deal over the past 50 years, what we do -- or fail to do -- in seeking new frontiers is no less consequential for our future in space and here on Earth. http://www.nasa.gov/news/media/trans/obama_ksc_trans.html 段落の意味としては、 宇宙計画の意味合いも、物事を測る基準も以前と変わってきている。 けれども、 未来のために私たちが新境地を求めようとすることは、昔も今も変わらない。 と捉えたのですが、そこが間違っているのでしょうか? アドバイスいただけると嬉しいです。 よろしくお願いします。

  • 英文和訳添削 お願いします。

    同じテーマ(イギリス英語)内から2題あるのですがお願いします (i) Everyone in the country seems to be aware of this variety to some extent, and most people take this diversity for granted much of the time. Variation in dialect,and especially in pronunciation,however,is a subject about which most people when pressed,and many people without requiring any invitation,are quite prepared to express an opinion. ★解釈★ S:Variation in dialect,and especially in pronunciation,(however), V:is O:<a subject> (関係代名詞:about which most people) 副詞句:when pressed, and S:<many people> ←(副詞句:without requiring any invitation,) V:are C:(quite)( 過去分詞:prepared) (不定詞の副詞用法:to express an opinion.) ★訳: 国の誰もが、ある程度この品種の認識と思われる とほとんどの人は多くの時間を与えられ、この多様性を取る。  しかしながら、方言の変化は、特に発音には、対象となる約ほとんどの人々押され、 そしてどんな招待状を必要とせずに多くの人々は、非常に意見を表明するために用意されている。 (ii) ★英文 To understand the dialect situation in this country, we must look not only at the number of years that the language has existed here but also at what has happened to the language during those years. ★解釈★ (不定詞副詞的用法:To understand the dialect situation in this country,) S:we must look not only (副詞句:at the number of years (接続詞節:that the language has existed here)) but also (?:at what has happened (不定詞名詞的用法:to the language during those years.)) 構文: not only A but also B ★訳★ この国の方言の状況を理解するためには、 我々は、言語がここに存在していることを年の数を調べるだけでなく、 何がにそれらの年の間に言語に起こっているかも調べる必要があります。 補足:どのようにしたら採点者様が添削しやすいか教えてください     また、自分自身の和訳過程にも焦点をおき自分の実力を把握しておきたいため     解釈と銘打って載せさせていただきました。

  • 英文和訳

    "We have to talk." To women, usually the ones saying this to men, these four words are often an expression of a desire to connect, to address something with a man on a deeper, more satisfying level. It often means, "Let's get together and see if we can move things to a better place." Saying this to a man can feel dangerous. As one woman put it "Get ready for World War Three" To men, these may be among the most feared words in the language. They often stimulate what we call male relational dread. One man's response was,"Let me out of here!" Another man said, "To me those words mean : `Next stop,divorce.`" These words often mean somethings quite different whwn they are said to someone ofthe same genger. When women say to other women,"We have to talk," it can mean a multitude of things. If the other woman is someone new with whom the woman feels friendly, it can mean,"Let's get to know each other." If it's an old friend whom she hasn't seen for a while, it can mean, "Let's catch up - do I have things to tell you!" And if it is a friend with whom she is in frequent, even daily contact,it can mean,"Wait till you hear this. I've got to tell you about last night." Men rarely say this to other men. When they do, sometimes it has a sense of invitation, as in, "Hey, let's catch up!" But often it has the connotation of "You're in big trouble with me.Get ready for a hassle." Gender differences in the meaning of these words start early. In our gender dialogues between seventh-grade boys and girls, their comments and questions often focus on "talk" : BOYS: Girls talk for most of the conversation so we don't have to talk. GIRLS: How come boys don't talk first? How these gender differences can be used in dialogue to heal the relationships between women and men is the topic of our discussion.

  • この英文の和訳お願いします。 難しいです。

    I have chosen to begin this book with a description of the life of this one individual because he typifies what so many observers regard as the social "problem" of old age. In his case we would find it impossible to ignore the crucial facts of bereavement, absence of children and other relatives, infirmity, and virtual social ostracism. If we mean anything by isolation from society he must be the sort of person we keep in mind. But is he exception or rule? Are there many others like him in our society? Many sociologists and administrators believe there are. One administrator expressed it in these terms: Provision for old age has emerged as a "problem" largely because of the loosening of family ties and insistence on individual rights and privileges to the exclusion of obligations and duties which has developed so markedly in recent years. Whereas families used to accept responsibility for their old people they now expect the State to look after them. The care and attention which the family used to provide for them must be provided in some other way. The separation from kin is supposed to be one of the features which serves to differentiate the industrial from the so-called primitive societies. But do old people in Britain lose touch with their married children and lead an isolated life? Are the bonds of kinship of little or no consequence especially in urban areas? We have only to pose these questions to realize the meed for more facts. What few there are do not confirm many current suppositions. Sheldon, in a pioneering study, drew attention to the important part played by relatives of old people in Wolverhampton and said that too little was known about their role.

  • この英文を和訳していただきたいです。

    和訳お願いします。 What makes somebody attractive? And this can be asked at all sorts of levels but a simple level is what makes for a pretty face? So,these are,according to ratings,very attractive faces. They are not the faces of real people. What's on the screen are computer generated faces of a Caucasian male and a Caucasian female who don't exist in the real world. But through using this sort of computer generation,and then asking people what they think of this face,what they think of that face,scientists have come to some sense as to what really makes a face attractive,both within cultures and across cultures. And that's something which we're going to devote some time to when we talk about social behavior,and in particular,when we talk about sex .Not all attractiveness,not all beauty of course,is linked to sex. So,pandas for instance,like this panda,are notoriously cute,and I don't have anything to say about it really. It's just a cute picture(laughter).

  • 英文和訳です

    Flying cars are even more prevalent in The Jetsons, a 1962 animated TV series about a “typical family” of the twenty-first century. Bubble-topped machines, apparently jet-powered and computer-controlled, have completely replaced the family station wagon (and, apparently, all other forms of ground transportation). The Jetson family’s car is capable of supersonic speeds and rock-steady hovering, and it folds itself into a briefcase when not in use. Typically, for stories about the future, it is ordinary to its users and astonishing to twentieth-century audiences. Blade Runner(1982) is nominally set in in the first decade of the twenty-first century, but its nightmarish vision of a more distant future. Residents are unfazed, therefore, when flying cars swoop overhead and a flying police cruiser descends vertically into their midst. よろしくお願いします^^;

  • 英文和訳です

    Flying cars are even more prevalent in The Jetsons, a 1962 animated TV series about a “typical family” of the twenty-first century. Bubble-topped machines, apparently jet-powered and computer-controlled, have completely replaced the family station wagon (and, apparently, all other forms of ground transportation). The Jetson family’s car is capable of supersonic speeds and rock-steady hovering, and it folds itself into a briefcase when not in use. Typically, for stories about the future, it is ordinary to its users and astonishing to twentieth-century audiences. Blade Runner(1982) is nominally set in in the first decade of the twenty-first century, but its nightmarish vision of a more distant future. Residents are unfazed, therefore, when flying cars swoop overhead and a flying police cruiser descends vertically into their midst. お願いします^^;

  • 以下の英文の和訳をお願いします。

    Although the magnitude of the variations of carbon-14 is strongly attenuated through the carbon cycle after being produced by the GCRs in the atmosphere (Siegenthaler and Beer, 1988), carbon-14 in tree-rings preserve the information on the variations in solar cycles and the magnetic dipole polarity of the sun. Therefore, the variability of the “11-year” solar cycle in association with the century-scale variations of solar activity can be monitored to asses its influence on climate. The lengths of sunspot periods have been modulated by a few years since the 11-year sunspot cycle was firstly found by Schwabe (1843). The maximum range observed so far is ~ 9 to ~ 14 years, but most of the cycles fit in ~ 10–12 years with the overall average being 11 years. However, we have previously found a change in average cycle length during the Maunder Minimum ((Miyahara et al., 2004); see Supplementary Fig. S1). The sunspots were scarce through 1645–1715 AD due to the anomalous weakening of the magnetic activity at this time, yet the carbon-14 abundances show the appearance of significant cyclic changes in magnetic activity. The average length of the cycles through the 70 years was about 14 years with the 28-year period of magnetic polarity reversals. The relationship between the cycle length of the “11-year” variation in sunspots and its magnitude has been investigated in several papers (Clough, 1905, Solanki et al., 2002 and Rogers et al., 2006). A consistent feature is the inverse correlation between cycle amplitudes and cycle lengths that maybe related to the change of the meridional flows inside the convection zone of the sun (Hathaway et al., 2003).

  • 英文の和訳をお願いします

    以下の文章です。 It is, of course, true that the emancipation of Asia and Africa and the development of the European crisis went hand in hand. Among the factors which facilitated the rise of independence movements in Asia and Africa, we must include the weakening of the grip of the European powers, Iargely as a consequence of their own discords and rivalries and of the wastage of resources in which their wars resulted. From the time of the First World War the incipient nationalist movements in the non-European world profited and the sudden collapse of the European empires after 1947 was to a large extent a consequence of external pressures and of the impact of world politics. In Asia neither the British nor the French nor the Dutch ever recovered from the blows inflicted by japan between 1941 and 1945; while in Africa and the Middle East they were checked and forced into retreat by pressures from the United States-acting directly and through the United Nations-which had a strong anti-colonial tradition of its own and was unwilling to stand aside while colonialism drove the peoples of Asia and Africa over to the side of the Soviet Union. Nationalism came to Asia a century later than it came to Europe and to black Africa fifty years later than to Asia. Two external events in the early years of the twentieth century were a powerful stimulus in its rise. The first was the victory of Japan over Russia in the war of 1904-5ー a victory hailed by dependent peoples everywhere as a blow to European ascendancy and proof that European arms were not invincible. Its impact was redoubled when, ten years later,the Japanese defeated the Germans in Shantung; and the successful campaigns of Kemal Ataturk against France in 1920 and Greece in 1922 were greeted in the same way as Asian victories over western military power. The second event was the Russian revolution of 1905ーa revolution which produced scarcely an echo in Europe but which, seen as a struggle for liberation from despotism, had an electrifying effect throughout Asia. The wave of unrest extended as far as Vietnam, and its impact, in sparking off the Persian revolution of 1906, the Turkish revolution of 1908 and the Chinese revolution of 1911, and in the new impetus it gave to the Indian Congress movement in 1907, was such that its consequences in Asia have been compared with those of the French revolution of 1789 in Europe.