• 締切済み

大大至急!!日本語訳お願いします!

of course,overparenting is far superior to no parenting at all,since parental neglect is known to be the root cause of a variety of emotional and behavioral problems iin children,even, most disturbingly,psychopathy, or so suggests robert hare in his 1993 book about the subject,without conscience. but helicopter-or over-parenting has its own consequences,not so extreme perhaps, but serious nevertheless. a study of university students by neil montgomety, a psychologist at keence state college in New hampshire,found that students with helicopter parents were more apt to be neurorotic than students with non-helicopter parents. they are less flexible and open to new ideas, as well as shier,more nervous, and more sensitive to criticism. about such students montgomery concludes,we have a person who is dependent,who is vulnerable,who is self-conscious,who is anxious,who is impulsive and undisciplined.not open to new actions or ideads. is that going to make a successfui college student and person? no,not exactly,it is really a sad story at the end of the day. 翻訳サイトでは無理でした お願いします

  • 英語
  • 回答数1
  • ありがとう数1

みんなの回答

  • SPS700
  • ベストアンサー率46% (15295/33014)
回答No.1

    ロバート•ヘアが『良心なしに』(1993)と言う題の、この問題に関する本で述べているように、一番気にかかる精神病室の子どもたちの場合でさえ、色々な情緒的、行動的問題の根源は、親の無関心にある訳だから、子育てのやり過ぎは、子どもを放っておくよりはずっといい事は、言うまでもない。     しかし、へりコプターというか、子育てのやり過ぎは、それ(=放置する)ほど極端ではないにしても、やはりそれなりの悪影響がある。     ニューハンプシャー州キーンズ州立大の心理学者であるニール•モントゴメリーによる大学生を対象とした調査では、ヘリコプター型両親の子弟は、非ヘリコプター型良心の子弟よりもノイローゼになりやすいと報じている。     彼ら(=ヘリコプター型両親の子弟)は、屈折しにくく(=順応力が低く、融通が利かない)、新しい考えを迎え入れず、人見知りをし、神経質で、(他からの)批判に敏感である(という)。     このような学生について、モントゴメリーは、 彼ら(=ヘリコプター型両親の子弟)は、自主性がなく、傷つきやすく、自意識過剰で、心配性で、反射行動的で、躾の出来ていない、新しい活動や理想を歓迎しない人間だと結論づける。     こういう人間が大学生や人間として成功するだろうか?  いや、そうだとは言えない、一日の終わりになってみると非常に悲しい話だ(>結論から言えば本当に残念なことだ)。

関連するQ&A

  • 助けてください12時までに日本語訳お願いします!

    of course,overparenting is far superior to no parenting at all,since parental neglect is known to be the root cause of a variety of emotional and behavioral problems iin children,even, most disturbingly,psychopathy, or so suggests robert hare in his 1993 book about the subject,without conscience. but helicopter-or over-parenting has its own consequences,not so extreme perhaps, but serious nevertheless. a study of university students by neil montgomety, a psychologist at keence state college in New hampshire,found that students with helicopter parents were more apt to be neurorotic than students with non-helicopter parents. they are less flexible and open to new ideas, as well as shier,more nervous, and more sensitive to criticism. about such students montgomery concludes,we have a person who is dependent,who is vulnerable,who is self-conscious,who is anxious,who is impulsive and undisciplined.not open to new actions or ideads. is that going to make a successfui college student and person? no,not exactly,it is really a sad story at the end of the day.

  • 大大大至急!!日本語訳お願いします!

    parents today ,say some social critics ,have a special dilemma to deal with. on the one hand,there is the pressure of competition the need for mons and dads to give their kids a head stars in life , to make sure their sons and daughter keep ahead of their peers in the race to success. As a result,parents push kids to grow up too fast , boasting that their boy or girl is already reading at age two, for example, or taking college level math courses in middle school .on the other hand, modern society is fraught with dangers of all kinds (particularly what the BBS calls the sexualization and commercialization of childhood by TV , movies,games,and ads that target kids ) to which parents respond by helicopter their children,hovering over them, solving all their problems,overprotecting them.

  • 日本語訳を教えてください(かなり長文です)(1)

    Why Chinese Mothers Are Superiorという記事の日本語訳を教えてください。よろしくお願いします。 A lot of people wonder how Chinese parents raise such stereotypically successful kids. They wonder what these parents do to produce so many math whizzes and music prodigies, what it's like inside the family, and whether they could do it too. Well, I can tell them, because I've done it. Here are some things my daughters, Sophia and Louisa, were never allowed to do: I'm using the term "Chinese mother" loosely. I know some Korean, Indian, Jamaican, Irish and Ghanaian parents who qualify too. Conversely, I know some mothers of Chinese heritage, almost always born in the West, who are not Chinese mothers, by choice or otherwise. I'm also using the term "Western parents" loosely. Western parents come in all varieties. All the same, even when Western parents think they're being strict, they usually don't come close to being Chinese mothers. For example, my Western friends who consider themselves strict make their children practice their instruments 30 minutes every day. An hour at most. For a Chinese mother, the first hour is the easy part. It's hours two and three that get tough. Despite our squeamishness about cultural stereotypes, there are tons of studies out there showing marked and quantifiable differences between Chinese and Westerners when it comes to parenting. In one study of 50 Western American mothers and 48 Chinese immigrant mothers, almost 70% of the Western mothers said either that "stressing academic success is not good for children" or that "parents need to foster the idea that learning is fun." By contrast, roughly 0% of the Chinese mothers felt the same way. Instead, the vast majority of the Chinese mothers said that they believe their children can be "the best" students, that "academic achievement reflects successful parenting," and that if children did not excel at school then there was "a problem" and parents "were not doing their job."

  • 日本語訳で困っています。

    うまく日本語訳ができません。だれか教えてください。お願いします。 (1)As a means of readjusting and staying in touch with the international scene, you may want to consider contacting students who have been abroad, who are currently abroad, or who are thinking about going abroad. (2)There are many ways of maintaining contact with friends you made overseas. (3)Discussing things and sharing experiences with others is almost always worthwhile. (4)The key is to build on the cross-cultural coping skills you now possess and to find conscious ways of introducing your new self into your personal and academic life, not seeing it as a dream or something unrelated to your future. 問題は以上です。文が長いので訳が難しいです。よろしくお願いします。

  • 大至急 日本語訳お願いします

    Every society is profoundly concerned about law and order. Fighting crime and punishing (or, ideally, rehabilitating) criminals is a top priority, not to mention a major budget burden. As Jay Gabler explains it in his entertaining and useful Sociology for Dummies, “Societies may be incredibly diverse and tolerant of a wide range of behavior.,but those behaviors as crimes are where societies draw the line and say YOU ' MAY NUT!” What causes antisocial or deviant behavior? Are some people born wicked and destined to lead a life of crime? Or is it environment parents, economics, racial inequality | that turns some of into thieves, murderers, or rapists?

  • 17-4日本語訳

    お願いします。  All that is amazing enough.What is even more amazing is that a poem he wrote when he was not much more than a teenager explains all that he knew and learned without a single number,equation,or diagram.Aryabhate wanted his information to be easy to remember.So he put all the numbers into a code of letters and combinations of letters,which he explains at the beginning of the poem,called the Aryabhatiyam.Then,in 121 verses,he explains the way the planets move in the sky better than anyone else would for 1,000 years.For Aryabhate,astronomy was a way of understanding the deities.As he wrote,“One who knows these verses,one who knows the movements of planets and celestial spheres,goes much beyond them and attains the absolute Brahman.”  At first,people learned his poem and passed it on without writing it down.The fact that it wasn't written down at first may be one reason we still have it.Insects and mildew destroyed Indian manuscripts,which were written on birch bark or palm leaves,very quickly.  Oddly,Aryabhate seems not to have known about India's biggest contribution to math and science,although his students did.What is it? Zero.You know-nothing.Believe it or not,no one had ever considered zero a number before.Had that ever messed up their arithmetic!  If the number zero is nothing,why is it such a big deal? Because by using the number zero,people can write numbers in columns,which makes adding,subtracting,and especially multiplying and dividing much easier.

  • 至急 この英文訳をお願いします!!

    The number of students receiving athletic scholarships is not necessarily proportional to the number of high school students participating in the sport. For example, basketball is one of the most popular sports among high school boys, but only about 7, 500 male college students are on scholarships in the sport. This means only one in 72 high school basketball players receives a college scholarship, compared to one in 23 in ice hockey

  • 至急日本語訳お願いします。

    Since parents control who sleeps where, it is their everyday beliefs that dectde sleeping arrangements. In those cultures in which the prime parental goal s to integrate children into the family, the household, and society, babies are close at hand, even during the night. It is primarily in those societies (mostly in the industrialized West, especially in the United States) where a premium is placed on independence and self-reliance that babies and children sleep alone. Underlying this unconscious societal even more damental assumption made by Americans and some other groups- how we that children from day one has a major effect on how they turn out as adults. This philosophy is not shared by all cultures. The Mayans; for example, see mother and infant as one until that cannot be separated, and believe offspring are not ready for guidance until they can speak and reason, when they are older children. Newborns in their culture are not capable of being trained, and, they feel, should just be cared for. Sleep, in other words, can take nuance. And the basis for that morality is, of course, culturally constructed. American parents believe it is morally "correct" for infants to sleep alone and thus learn alertness ). They view child-parent co-sleeping as strange, psychologically unhealthy, and even sinful. Those in co-sleeping cultures see the Western practice of placing an infant alone as wrong and a form of child neglect or parental irresponsibility. Parents in both kinds of cultures are convinced that their moral structure is "correct" .

  • 日本語訳をお願いいたします。

    The more vociferous students in the group sometimes tend to take over in terms of volume and output. The process of writing gives everyone an equal opportunity to express themselves,with no one taking non-stop or politely waiting their turn. Writing down their views gave them a little more time to process other students'contributions and respond appropriately. よろしくお願いいたします!

  • 助けてください 日本語訳でお願いします

    More and more these days we are interacting socially through indirect contact using new technologies like email and instant messaging, or texting. Many psychologists, linguists, and sociologists have lined up to condemn this new kind of communication, primarily because, as the American philosopher and linguist Jerrold Katz once articulated it. “To type is not to be human, to be in cyberspace is not to be real; all is pretense and alienation, a poor substitute for the real thing." You can't get more emphatic than that! Skeptics of the new technologies also argue that they encourage isolation, making it difficult for us to form genuine friendships. As Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) psychologist Sherry Turkle wrote recently, “The little devices most of us carry around are so powerful that they change not only what we do, but also who we are We've become accustomed to a new way of ‘being alone together.