• 締切済み
  • すぐに回答を!


A blind date is a date for two people who have never met before. Their mutual friends usually arrange the match. With the rise of the Internet, blind dates are becoming more common than before. Through instant messaging and Internet chat forums, people have a chance to meet people. Blind dating is exciting for some people, but it can be a stressful emotional experience for others. This may be mainly due to a lack of self-confidence and the inevitable fear of meeting an unknown. In the United States, people often talk about the experience of their friends. Some people like to gossip a lot. People who like to gossip often talk about individuals they may not know and that can be hurtful, especially if rumors and gossip continue to be shared. This conversation is between two friends about another friend. In this case, the two friends, Amy and Lisa, having the conversation want the information to remain confidential in order to protect this mutual friend, Toshi. At the end of this conversation, the two friends agree to keep their information confidential. "I've got your back" is a phrase used as reassurance between friends. the phrase is used to show confidentiality, solidarity and trust.


  • 回答数1
  • 閲覧数98
  • ありがとう数0


  • 回答No.1
  • sayshe
  • ベストアンサー率77% (4555/5904)

ブラインドデートは、これまで会ったことのない2人がデートすることです。 彼らの双方の友人が、通常その出会いを手配します。 インターネットの普及とともに、ブラインドデートは以前より一般的になっています。 インスタントメッセージングとインターネット・チャット・フォーラムで、人々には、出会いの機会があります。 ブラインドデートが刺激的に思える人もありますが、それがストレスの多い感情的な経験になる人もいます。 これは、主として自信の不足と未知の人に会う避けがたい不安によるのかもしれません。 アメリカ合衆国では、人々は彼らの友人の経験について、しばしば話します。 うわさ話をたくさんするのが好きなひともいます。 うわさ話をするのが好きな人々は、彼らが知らないかもしれない個人についてしばしば話します、 そして、特に噂とゴシップが共有され続けるならば、それは傷つけることがありえます。 この会話は、もう一人の友人について2人の友人の間で行われます。 この場合、会話をしているエイミーとリサと言う2人の友人は、この双方の友人であるトシを保護するために情報が秘密のままであることを望みます。 この会話が終わる時、2人の友人は、彼らの情報を秘密にしておくことに同意します。 「私は、あなたを守る[かばう]」は、友人の間の元気づけの言葉として使われるフレーズです。そのフレーズは、守秘性、団結、信頼を示すのに用いられます。



  • 和訳を教えてください。

    長い文章ですみませんが、和訳を教えてください。契約書の文章です。 Confidentiality Obligations. Each Party (the “Recipient”) hereby agrees (a) that all Confidential Information (as defined below) of or relating to the other Party (the “Disclosing Party”) disclosed or communicated to the Recipient orally, in writing or in any other manner (including, but not limited to, demonstrations and plant visits), whether before or after the Effective Date, will be held in strict confidence and, except as expressly permitted herein, will not be disclosed to any other person or entity, (b) that the Recipient will use the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information solely for the Purpose, (c) that the Recipient will safeguard the secrecy of such Confidential Information by following procedures at least as stringent, and with not less than a reasonable degree of care, as those used in safeguarding its own valuable confidential information and trade secrets and (d) that, other than as agreed to by the Recipient and the Disclosing Party, the Recipient shall not make any changes, modifications or enhancements to the Confidential Information, or reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, alter, modify, or create any derivative work from such Confidential Information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Recipient (i) may disclose the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information to third party testing facilities used for regulatory compliance testing and certification bodies (collectively, “Representatives”), having a need to know such Confidential Information in furtherance of such Purpose (which, if △△ is the Recipient, shall be limited to its product stewardship group and such testing facilities), (ii) shall inform all such Representatives at the time of disclosure of the confidential nature of the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information and the limited Purpose hereunder, (iii) shall require each such Representative to abide by the terms of this Agreement with respect to the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information and (iv) shall be liable for any breach by its Representatives of such obligations.

  • 正誤問題と穴埋め問題です

    以下の問題がわかりません。どなたか教えてください。 1.The benefits 〈to be gaining〉 from daily 〈exercise〉 and proper diet 〈cannot be disputed〉 any more 〈as a result〉 of scientific findings. 2.〈Following〉 my science professor, the atmosphere of this planet 〈is being polluted〉 by humans 〈at〉 an 〈ever-increasing〉 rate. 3.A ( ) woman is needed to take care of two small children. (a) confident (b) delicate (c) dependable (d) confidential 4.These days I lack the necessary ( ) to read books regularly. (a) contemplation (b) convenience (c) conception (d) concentration 5.My uncle is a gtrat linguist. He is ( ) in six languages. (a) fluent (b) fluffy (c) fluid (d) florid 1.to be gaining → gained だと思うのですが、全体の意味がわかりません。 2.Following が違うと思うのですが、正しくはどうなるのでしょう。 3.辞書によればdependable →「信頼できる」 confidential →「信頼の置ける」とありどちらも入れそうなのですがどうなのでしょうか。 4.concentrationだと思うのですが意味が良くわかりません。contemplationではだめでしょうか。 5.fluent だとおもうのですが、辞書に fluid→「流暢な」とあるのですがよくわかりません。 以上です。よろしくお願いします。

  • この英文の和訳お願いします。 難しいです。

    There are therefore 192 subjects(forty per cent of the sample) whose happiness and domestic efficiency are to a greater or lesser extent dependent on the ready accessibility of their children or other relatives. No solution of the problems of old age will be acceptable to the people themselves or to their children which does not take the family factor into account. King, Sir Geoffrey, formerly Permanent Secretary, Ministry, of Pensions and National Insurance, "Policy and Practice", Old Age in the Modern World, 1995. Studies in other places such as Hammersmith, Acton, and Northern Ireland have also produced some evidence of close ties between old people and their relatives and of a willingness to bear the burden of nursing care. But the evidence gained in these inquiries was incidental to their main purposes. There has been no specialized study of the place of the old person in the family. Yet such detailed knowledge may be fundamental to any understanding of old age or of its problems. That is the starting point of this study. How often do old people see their children and their brothers and sisters, and do they live near or far? What services do relatives perform for each other every day and at times of crisis? What is the differences in family role of an old man and an old woman? Can a more precise meaning be given to loneliness and social isolation and what does it mean to be widowed, single, or childless? Is the status of old people undergoing change? Which old people make the greatest demand on the State aid or replace the efforts of the family? These are some of the questions which will be discussed in this report.

  • 和訳お願いします

    Each ten years, the government conducts a national census, which is authorized by the Constitution. Most of us do not object to answering the questions that the census poses, but what if you should decide to refuse to answer the questions? Could you do so on the basis that they represent an invasion of your privacy? This has been answered by the courts, which hold that it is a proper government function and a necessary one to gather reliable statistics that have a bearing on governmental functions, and that intelligent legislation can only be formulated if the government has the facts. It is probable that people answer the census questions because they believe their answers will be kept confidential and that the information will not be used to hurt them. Census answers cannot be utilized by parties in a lawsuit and used without the consent of the party giving the answers. However, general statistics can be used, and the statistics gathered in the census have been used, for the good of all.

  • 和訳(契約書)を教えてください

    はじめて質問させていただきます。 慣れない和訳をしています。秘密保持契約書の一部ですが、ご教授いただけると幸いです。 2. Use of information:For a period of three(3) years after the date of this agreement, the Recipient undertakes in relation to Confidential Information received from the Discloser or from any of the Discloser's Representatives; 受領者は、契約の日付から3年間、開示者あるいは開示者の代表のいずれかから受け取った機密情報に関して責任を負う。 2.2 not to copy or reduce to writing any such Confidential Information except as may be reasonably necessary for the purpose pursuant to Clause 2.1 above. 上記条項2.1に従って目的に合理的にそして必要な場合を除き、いかなる秘密情報をもコピーしたり書き加えたりしないこと。 2.6 to maintain a list of Representatives to whom any Confidential Information is disclosed and to make such list available to the Discloser or request. ※まったく文章をつなげることが出来ません…。 上記二つの文は間違っているとは思いますが、訳をつけてみました。最後の一文は文章にすることができませんでした…。 「2.Use of information:」はそれに続く各条項の主語になるのでしょうか。それとも一般条項の名称として考え、あとの文につなげることは不要でしょうか。 また、「2.Use of information:」の最後の単語「any of the Discloser's Representatives」は各条項の主語にすべき単語なのでしょうか。 まったくの初心者で説明も不十分かと思いますが。よろしくお願いします。

  • ビジネス文章で「秘密文書」って使いますか?

    英文のビジネス文書の和訳中です。 「confidential not to be reproduced without permission of proprietor」 という文ですが、軽めのconfidentialなので丸秘や秘密という言葉を使うのもなんかおかしい気がするのですが。。。 「秘密文書、所有者の了解なしに複製を禁ずる」 としたのですが、いかがなものでしょう? 「秘密文書」以外に何か適当な軽めの意味での「confidential」の訳はないものでしょうか? 会社は関係ないので「社外持ち出し禁止」などもしっくりきません。 お知恵拝借お願いします。

  • この英文の和訳をお願いします。

    To avoid this difficulty, we consider the scale height to be (i+αr_G) rather than i, where α is a numerical factor; α must have a value of the order of 10 to be consistent with Eq. (35). For the requirements that in the limit of i=0, <P(e,i)>_2B has to naturally tend to <P(e,0)>_2B given by Eq. (28), we put the modified collisional rate in the two-body approximation to be <P(e,i)>_2B=Cπr_p^2{1+6/(r_p(e^2+i^2))}(e^2+i^2)^(1/2)/(2(i+ατ_G))            (36) with C=((2/π)^2){E(k)(1-x)+2αE(√(3/4))x},                (37) where x is a variable which reduces to zero for i>>αr_G and to unity for i<<αr_G. The above equation reduces to Eq. (29) when i>>αr_G while it tends to the expression of the two-dimensional case (28) for i<<αr_G. Taking α to be 10 and x to be exp(-i/(αr_G)), <P(e,i)> scaled by Eq. (36) is shown in Fig. 17. Indeed, the modified <P(e,i)>_2B approximates <P(e,i)> within a factor of 5 in whole regions of the e-I plane, especially it is exact in the high energy limit (v→∞). However, two peaks remain at e≒1 and i≒3, which are closely related to the peculiar features of the three-body problem and hence cannot be reproduced by Eq. (36). Fig. 16a and b. Behaviors of r_min(i,b): a i=0, b i=2, 2.5, and 3.0. The level of the planetary radius (r_p=0.005) is denoted by a dashed line. Fig. 17. Contours of <P(e,i)> normalized by the modified <P(e,i)>_2B given by Eq. (36). Fig. 16a and b.↓ http://www.fastpic.jp/images.php?file=4940423993.jpg Fig. 17.↓ http://www.fastpic.jp/images.php?file=5825412982.jpg よろしくお願いします。

  • 和訳していただけませんか。

     実際に契約に使用するものではないのですが、今NDAの和訳をしています。下記のセンテンスがイマイチ内容がつかめなく、文章にすることが出来ません。 教えていただけませんでしょうか。 The parties agree to use reasonable efforts to summarize the content of oral disclosures which are proprietary or confidential but failure to provide such summary shall not affect the nature of the INFORMATION disclosed or detract from the protection afforded under this Agreement if such INFORMATION was identified as confidential or proprietary when orally disclosed.

  • 英文の和訳をお願いしたいです

    Now that Congress and the President have shown their true colors to the American people and free citizens around the world, it is our civic duty to expose and resist this descent into lawless tyranny that not only keeps the American people from having the basic right to know what’s in our food, but also prevents open and independent scientific studies to be conducted on patented GMOs crops.

  • この英文の和訳お願いします。 難しいです。

    翻訳サイトだと意味がおかしくなるので質問しました。 Later in this book I will describe information gained from other sources. Twelve old people in the sample were kind enough to keep a diary of their activities for a week in the spring of 1955. Four of these diaries are reproduced in an appendix. Special surveys were made of the social and family background of old people seeking help from the social services: a sample group of some 200 people originating in East London who spent the last period of their lives in L.C.C homes; and finally, 400 people being visited by home helps in Bethnal Green. The object of these surveys was, first, to explore the respective functions of relatives and of the social services in helping to meet the needs of old people, and second, to pinpoint those groups who make the heaviest demands on statutory and voluntary provision. In presenting the results I have tried throughout to keep individual people in the forefront. The research worker is so anxious to establish patterns, uniformities, and systems of social action that he is tempted to plan questionnaires that can be filled in simply and to confine his report largely to classificatory lists and tables of statistics. The uniqueness of each individual and each family is probably the fundamental difficulty about this. However those to be studied are selected, whether on grounds of likeness in age, situation, occupation, or class, once one meets them and behavior, relationships, attitude and interpretation. Standard questions, prepared beforehand, mean different things to different people; they are sometimes appropriate, sometimes inappropriate; by themselves they do not provide an adequate means of thoroughly investigating subjects as complex as this. Before one can apply or interpret the reliability of answers to set questions, one needs a fair idea of the most important relationships, activities, and characteristics of each person approached, important, that is, as they are judged by him. Too many of the principal features of social life might otherwise be missed or misrepresented. Although I believe with conviction that the methods of interviewing should be flexible and that reports on social research should convey the quality and diversity of individual and social behavior, I am not suggesting that the search for patterns of behavior, through statistical analysis and correlation, is not important. I am submitting only that once a social inquiry moves beyond simple description and measurement, for instance, of facts of a basically demographic kind, the build-up of statistics and indices of behavior becomes a subtle and complicated process that can only proceed in the context of a wide knowledge of the societies concerned. And such knowledge cannot be gained unless there is direct and continuous acquaintance with the people who are being studied.