Understanding Animal Research: Educating the Public on Animal Research Policies

前へ 次へ
このQ&Aのポイント
  • Understanding Animal Research is an organization dedicated to educating the public about animal research policies and procedures. They aim to reduce the use of animals in experiments and promote the development of alternative methods.
  • Animal rights activists, represented by groups like PETA, focus on reducing animal suffering in various industries such as factory farming, laboratories, clothing trade, and entertainment. However, some extremists resort to violence in their protests.
  • Debate between public organizations has led to refinements in procedures and may eventually lead to the replacement of animal models. The level of violence has increased in the past decade, with unclear reasons for the rise in Europe.
回答を見る
  • ベストアンサー

英文和訳です

Understanding Animal Research (the successor organization to the Research Defence Society, a group mentioned in the article) is dedicated to educating the public about animal research policies and procedures. Animal rights activists are represented by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), a group who states that it “focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time : on factory farms, in laboratories, in the clothing trade, and in the entertainment industry.” Another group, the Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME), states its mission as “the total elimination of the need for any laboratory animal procedures, through the development, validation, and acceptance of replacement alternative methods.” Debate between public organizations such as those listed above has reduced the use of animals in experiments, led to refinements in procedures, and may well lead to the total replacement of animal models. Some extremists on the animal rights side, unfortunately, are not patient enough to work through this process. They “liberate” animals from research facilities, destroy labs and records, burn down houses of researchers and pharmaceutical company executives, and threaten further violence. The level of violence on the European continent increased in the first decade of the 21st　century, and it is not clear if a crackdown on animal rights extremists in the UK contributed to this increase. よろしくお願いします＾＾；

  • 英語
  • 回答数1
  • ありがとう数1

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • sayshe
  • ベストアンサー率77% (4555/5904)
回答No.1

＜訳例＞ Understanding Animal Research（論文で言及された　Research Defence Society　の後継組織）は、動物研究の方針と手順について市民を教育するために専念します。 動物の権利保護活動家は、People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)によって、代表されています、PETA　は、それが「最大多数の動物が、最も長期間、最も強く苦しむ4つの領域：すなわち、工場式農園、研究所、衣類取引、娯楽産業、にその注意を集中させる」と、述べるグループです。 もう一つのグループ、the Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME)　は、「代替方式への置き換えの開発、検証、承認を通して、あらゆる研究所での動物処置の必要性の全廃」が、その使命であると述べています。 上記の団体のような公共団体の間の議論は、実験における動物の使用を減らし、手順における改良につながりました、そして、多分、動物モデルの完全な置き換えにつながるでしょう。 動物の権利側の一部の過激派は、残念なことに、このプロセスを通して活動できるほど十分忍耐強くありません。 彼らは、動物を研究施設から「解放」し、研究室や記録を破壊し、研究者や製薬会社経営陣の家を焼き払い、更なる暴力行為を実行すると脅します。 ヨーロッパ大陸での暴力のレベルは、21世紀の最初の10年間に増加しました、そして、英国の動物の権利過激派に対する取締りが、この増加の一因となったかどうかは明らかではありません。 ＜団体名和訳＞（正しい和訳かどうかは、不明です） Understanding Animal Research：動物研究の理解 Research Defence Society：研究防止協会 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)：動物の倫理的取り扱いを求める人々（PETA) the Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME)：医学実験の動物の置き換えのための基金（FRAME)

NEKOTA1
質問者

お礼

ありがとうございました おかげで助かりました＾＾

  1. カテゴリ
  2. 学問・教育
  3. 語学
  4. 英語

関連するQ&A

  • 和訳お願いします

    (1)animal rights advocates have expressed concern over the conditions in many zoos and circuses where animals are kept. (2)animal rights activist have protested against various forms of animals experimentation, noting that procedures such as vivisection ignore the capacity of animals to feel pain.

  • 英文の意味について。

    下の英文について、わからないことがあります。 The results provide the most complete picture so far of the public's views on animal research-from die-hard activists who even oppose experiments that don't harm animals to the 1 in 20 people prepared to let monkeys die to test cosmetics. (1)the public's views on animal research-from die-hard activist の部分は、どういう意味か。 （animal research とは動物実験のことか、research と from の間に ハイフンがあるのはなぜか） (2) the 1 in 20 people なぜthe がつくのか（20人中1人という意味ならthe はいらないんじゃないか、強調ならば、1人も＝多いことを強調　又は　1人しか＝少ないことを強調、のどちらなのか。。。） お分かりになるかた、教えていただくと助かります。 よろしくお願いします。

  • 英文の和訳をお願いします

    またすいません… What the scientists did in the center was to thaw small parts of the animal and look for clues-clues that could tell us more about the would of the mammoth. Another group involved in mammoth research was an international team headed by Dr.Goto Kazufumi. 長くてすいません

  • この分の訳がわかりません

    Animal rights activists are represented by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), a group who states that it “focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time : on factory farms, in laboratories, in the clothing trade, and in the entertainment industry.” よろしくお願いします＾＾；

  • 和訳してくださいm(_ _)m３

    Several groups of scientists have been working on projects to revive the mammoth. One, for example, is the French explorer, Bernard Buigues, and his team. In December 1997, they used new technology to dig out a mammoth which had been in the Arctic ground for about 23,000 years. Then they carried it by helicopter to a research center in Khatanga, a small in Siberia. What the scientists did in the center was to thaw small parts of the animal and look for clues―that could tell us more about the world of the mammoth. They also wanted to collect DNA from the animal and examine its genetic makeup.

  • 和訳お願いします！！！

    (１)　The nature of children's rights is unique in that children are　socially　powerless　to　voice　their　views,　and　that　their　realisation　is　subject　to　an　understanding of children's rights by parents, teachers and the public in general. (２)　What may be considered as ”violence" in the public arena is often committed at school under the labels "cane of affection" and educational consideration. (３)　some schools maintain strict rules in the name of anti-deliquency measures and improving students' academic performance, without questioning whether this might contradict the underlying assumption of respect for children's rights.

  • 次の英文の和訳をお願いします。

    The American Journal of Public Health continues to be a leader in the field of Public Health, publishing quality research that is highly cited. Our 2013 impact factor is 4.229, an increase over last year, and ranks the journal #4 out of 136 titles in the Public, Environmental and Occupational Health category in the Social Sciences Citation Index and #14 of 160 titles in the same category for the Science Index. Dr. John Ruffin, Director of the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, was interveiwed by Dr. Stephen Thomas and Dr. Sandra Quinn of the University of Maryland Center for Health Equity and Guest Editors of this theme issue. Dr. Ruffin discusses a variety of issues related to the importance of including minorities in research, the changing demographics of the US population, new challenges for researchers, the value of community participation, and how minority inclusion research is "not one size fits all." In the wake of the tragic shooting at the Washington, DC, Naval Yard on Monday, September 16, 2013, the journal has compiled a collection of papers and other resources to help promote awareness and policy change surrounding gun violence, veterans health, and suicide. For those seeking more information on organizations that work with victims of gun violence and other types of violence, please consult Chapter 11 from APHA's book, Confronting Violence. Additionally, the following articles and content have been unlocked to public viewing: Shim et al: Primary Care, Behavioral Health, and Public Health: Partners in Reducing Mental Health Stigma. Lewiecki et al: Suicide, Guns, and Public Policy. Siegel et al: The Relationship Between Gun Ownership and Firearm Homicide Rates in the United States, 1981–2010. Henderson et al: Mental Illness Stigma, Help Seeking, and Public Health Programs. Magruder et al: The Role of Pain, Functioning, and Mental Health Suicidality Among Veterans Affairs Primary Care Patients. Keyes et al: To Flourish or Not: Positive Mental Health and All-Cause Mortality. Kaplan et al: Suicide Risk and Precipitating Circumstances Among Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Male Veterans. Vernick et al: Availability of Litigation as a Public Health Tool for Firearm Injury Prevention: Comparison of Guns, Vaccines, and Motor Vehicles. Branas et al: Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault. Fledderus et al: Mental Health Promotion as a New Goal in Public Mental Health Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention Enhancing Psychological Flexibility. Druss et al: Mental Health Promotion in a Reformed Health Care System. Davis et al: Reduced Mortality Among Department of Veterans Affairs Patients With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Lost to Follow-Up and Engaged in Active Outreach to Return for Care. Lane et al: Prevalence of Perceived Stress and Mental Health Indicators Among Reserve-Component and Active-Duty Military Personnel. Ilgen et al: Patterns of Treatment Utilization Before Suicide Among Male Veterans With Substance Use Disorders. Katz et al: Lessons Learned From Mental Health Enhancement and Suicide Prevention Activities in the Veterans Health Administration.

  • 英文の和訳をお願いします。

    Their discoveries concern the manipulation of living cells, and lie at the heart of the techniques for cloning animals and generating stem cells, the primitive cells from which the mature tissues of the body develop. Dr. Gurdon was the first to clone an animal, a frog, and Dr. Yamanaka discovered the proteins with which an adult cell can be converted to an egg-like state. The prize was announced in Stockholm. 　　（Nicholas Wade "Cloning and Stem Cell Work Earns Nobel"より）

  • 英文の和訳お願いします

    Advocates of slow food are concerned with eating food which promotes good health and is produced in such a way as to be environmentally responsible and humane regarding the treatment of animals raised for consumption. この英文の和訳をお願いします

  • 次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

    The article mentions that it took 17 years from the beginning of the investigation to the publication of the 11 papers on Ardi in 2009. During that time only one paper was published by the team members, in 1994. It is interesting that the team did not publish papers on the research for 15 years, for we live in the era of “publish or perish” – in other words, professors understand that they need to publish academic articles in order to keep their jobs, or at least to be able to advance their careers. True, 47 of the 70 investigators on the team were listed as authors on the 11 papers. Also, the publication of the papers all at once essentially guaranteed that the papers were given a lot of attention. Still, it is encouraging that the universities and other institutions that funded the research continued to support the team members despite the lack of papers. After all, “publish or perish” is largely due to the need for universities to be recognized as places where a lot of research is being done. High levels of publication lead to high evaluations, which helps attract students and funding to a particular university. The presence of good students and large research budgets help the school maintain its excellence. So the term “publish or perish” may not be quite as cynical as it first sounds.

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ

専門家に質問してみよう

職業から探して質問する

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVEセレクト

質問する