検索結果

どうしてネパールに行こうと思いましたか？

看護学生です。現在実習中で、ステロイド内服治療中の患者を受け持っています。患者への指導で、ステロイドは免疫抑制があり感染のリスクがあることを説明するのですが、なぜ免疫力が低下するのか、なぜ免疫が低下したら感染のリスクが高まるのか、うまく伝える方法を教えていただきたいです。患者は老年期であるため、できるだけ分かりやすく伝えるように言われました。 よろしくお願い致します。

日本国民が愛国心が希薄なのは、韓国のように徴兵制度がないからでは？ 身体も鍛えられるし、ニートや引きこもりの解決にも繋がるかもしれない。 政府は徴兵制度を真剣に検討すべきである！

若いときはよく一人旅をしましたが 今は怖いですか？ 国内でも危ない地域はありますか 夜は勿論ホテルから一歩も出ませんが、 夏になると変な人もいませんか？ ※OKWAVEより補足：「開けよう！たびの宝石箱！国内海外の旬な旅情報のご紹介＆旅の疑問にお答えします！」コミュニティから投稿された質問です。

In 1925, the British Official Historian J. E. Edmonds, wrote in the History of the Great War that from 13 to 31 October, the twelve 3rd Division battalions had been opposed by thirteen German infantry regiments, four Jäger battalions and 27 cavalry regiments. The British troops had succeeded in repulsing German attacks through endurance and fire-discipline, which had multiplied the effect of a small number of troops. The German 6th Army had been reinforced and originally been intended to break through from Arras to La Bassée and Armentières, until 29 October when all available heavy artillery was transferred north for the Battle of Gheluvelt. Attacks against II Corps were reduced to holding operations and the front opposite the French at Arras was kept passive. When the Indian Corps took over, the German offensive in the area had almost ended. Edmonds wrote that in defence, soldiers sheltered in improvised positions with little protection from artillery and little barbed wire. Much of the country was wooded, which obscured large areas of the front from aeroplane observers, who spent more time grounded by the October weather. The Allied force was made up of Belgian, French and British army units and faced a homogeneous opponent with unity of command but the main German advantage was in heavy artillery and trench warfare equipment, much of which did not exist in the Allied armies. The II Corps had c. 14,000 casualties, from 12 to 31 October. The 3rd Division had 5,835 losses, with the 8th and 9th brigades reduced by about 50 percent. The 5th Division casualties were similar and the Indian Corps up to 31 October had 1,565 casualties. On 31 October II Corps had only 14,000 men of the original 24,000 man establishment, of which c. 1,400 men were inexperienced drafts. The Germans recorded 6,000 casualties during the battles with II Corps.[48] II Corps was withdrawn for ten day's rest, from the night of 29/30 October and relieved by the Indian Corps but within days, most of its battalions had to be sent to I and III corps as reinforcements. Smith-Dorrien returned to England on 10 November and Willcocks assumed command of the 14th Brigade of the 5th Division, which acted as a mobile reserve. The Indian Corps battalions came under much shellfire during the relief and remained in the front-line trenches, instead of retreating further back temporarily, a practice which had been adopted by experienced units. On 2 November, a bigger German attack north-west of Neuve-Chapelle drove a Gurkha battalion back until local counter-attacks recovered the ground by 5 October and the old trenches were filled in and abandoned. By 3 November, the Indian Corps had suffered 1,989 casualties along its 8 mi (13 km) front. Some historians have written that c. 65 percent of Indian casualties were self-inflicted wounds, not always punished by court martial but a study by Sir B. Seton in 1915, found no evidence to support such an allegation.

After the Siege of Maubeuge in France, German super-heavy artillery was moved towards Antwerp which like Liège and Namur, would be untenable unless it could be incorporated into the main Allied front line, like the fortified regions of Verdun and Belfort in France. On 25 September the French General Staff (GQG) requested another sortie from Antwerp and the Belgian General Staff began to plan another operation. Signs of German preparations for a general attack on Antwerp, led to the forces intended for the sortie being reduced. The 5th Division, elements of the 4th Division and the Cavalry Division, which held the defences on the west side of the National Redoubt at Dendermonde and the Waasland, attacked German troops moving westward from Aalst. Although they succeeded in making a small advance, a counter-attack by the 37th Landwehr Brigade, supported by heavy artillery, led to the cancelling of the assault. On 28 September, the German bombardment of the Antwerp fortresses began. The German bombardment began on 28 September, with German siege guns directed by observation balloons on gun emplacements, flanking positions and magazines, which were the most vital parts of the forts, had by 6:00 p.m. on 29 September with extraordinary accuracy, made Fort Sint-Katelijne-Waver untenable and extensively damaged Fort Walem. Preparations to evacuate the Belgian Army to Ostend were begun by the Belgian Army Headquarters on 29 September and wounded, recruits, untrained men, prisoners of war, transport, equipment, ammunition and industrial machinery were gradually moved from Antwerp. The route out of the city crossed the Scheldt on two narrow pontoon bridges at the city centre and at Burcht. Trains had to run south along the right bank, cross the Rupel near German infantry positions only 10,000 yards (9,100 m) from the siege guns at Mechelen and then cross the railway bridge at Temse 12 miles (19 km) away. From 29 September – 7 October trains with lights extinguished, ran each night unopposed. The 4th Division assembled at Dendermonde, where a German attack was expected and the Cavalry Division guarded the river line, to protect the escape route between the Dender and the coast. Early on 29 September, the Belgian Prime Minister, Charles de Broqueville, informed the British that if all the outer forts were lost, the government and field army of 65,000 men would withdraw to Ostend and leave the 80,000 fortress troops to hold Antwerp for as long as possible. The next day, de Broqueville formally appealed to the British and French governments for help.

In northern France, German troops engaged in mutual outflanking attempts, from the Aisne northwards since September, had reached Arras. Lens was captured by I Bavarian Reserve Corps on 5 October. Three German cavalry corps had attempted another flanking manoeuvre to the north and IV Cavalry Corps had reached Zwartberg and Mont des Cats near Ypres. The advance of the German army threatened to block the western retreat route of the Belgian army out of Antwerp. On 6 October discussions between the British and Belgians, led to a decision to withdraw the field army to the west bank of the Scheldt, where it could maintain contact with a relieving force and avoid the danger of being trapped on the east bank. On the night of 6/7 October the 1st, 3rd and 5th divisions crossed the river and joined the Cavalry, 4th and 6th divisions, as the eight forts of the inner ring were taken over by fortress troops. Intervening trenches between forts 2 and 7 were occupied by the two British naval brigades and the 4th and 7th Fortress regiments, with the Belgian 2nd Division and British Marine Brigade in reserve. The British forces under the command of Major-General Archibald Paris, were ordered by First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill to continue the defence for as long as possible and to be ready to cross to the west bank rather than participate in a surrender. Early on 7 October, two battalions of Landwehr Regiment 37 were able to cross the Scheldt at Schoonaerde by boat, during a thick fog. The Belgian 6th Division made several counter-attacks which were repulsed and a bridge was built by the evening over which the rest of the Landwehr crossed. The width of the escape route from Antwerp, had been reduced to fewer than 12 miles (19 km), which led to the Belgian commanders ordering the field army to retreat behind the Terneuzen Canal, which ran from Ghent northwards to the Dutch border. The 1st and 5th divisions, which had lost most casualties and a brigade each of the 3rd and 6th divisions moved first and the remaining troops less the 2nd Division in Antwerp, formed a flank guard on the Scheldt and the Durme. The Belgian army headquarters moved to Zelzate 25 miles (40 km) further west. A Belgian improvised brigade was at Ghent and British troops in the area were requested to move to Ghent, after a German cavalry division was reported to be near Kruishoutem 12 miles (19 km) to the south-west. Later in the day German troops entered fort Broechem and the Massenhoven redoubt to the north unopposed, which widened the gap in the Antwerp defence perimeter to 14 miles (23 km) and began to move German super-heavy artillery over the Nete, which took until 8 October. At 11:25 p.m. on 7 October German 6-inch (150 mm) howitzers began to bombard the city.

ちょっと体力を使う仕事から戻ってきたら 女性３人で楽しくお喋り。 使ったものを片付けないといけない ので、その近くに行ったところ タイトルは 「メンヘラについて」でした。 どういうのがメンヘラなのかという、 別に他人のお世話などうでもいい話。 こちらは時短で済ませようと 頭使って仕事しましたが、思わず 嫌味の一言でも言いたくなりました。 しかも、上司は注意せず。 接客業でこんなです。 誰かから見られてる意識なし。 明らかに怒りオーラを出していたら 急にバタバタと仕事し始めてました。 その後、その３人に素っ気ない態度を 取ってしまいましたが、最近こんな事が 続いて辞めたくなりました。 見てるとよく喋ってる。 ゆるい職場と居心地のいい職場と 勘違いしてるんですが、上司も注意しない くらい役に立たないので退職を 考えてます。 接客業ってこれが普通なんでしょうか？

【兵士】と【軍属】とでは、職位的にどのような違いがあるのでしょうか？ 簡潔的な解説を、お願い致します。

誰からどうやって取り戻すんですか？ 日本の政治は誰かに奪われたんですか？ 日本の政治家が勝手に投げ捨てた？失った？だけなのに、「取り戻す」って意味がわかりません。 「アメリカの傀儡はもうやめます」とか「親中派・親韓派を徹底排除します」とかなら、まぁ何とか意味わかりますが。 政治家がだらしない仕事ばかりやってないで、もう一度気合い入れなおして国民と向き合えばいいだけなのでは？

自衛隊ができることについて疑問に思ったことがあります。 1.領土、領空、領海に他国の軍が侵入してきたときに自衛隊はどんなことができるのでしょうか？ 2. 他国の軍ができることと自衛隊ができることの違いは何？ 3. 憲法9条をどのように改正すればいいと思いますか？また、そのように改正すると何が変わるのでしょうか？

『文句』＝マイナスなイメージもありますが、 ・自己の意見を主張する ・他人のやり方、考え方に物申す など皆さんの解釈をお聞かせ頂けたら幸いです。

有名なマッカーサーの言葉のルーツは、当時米兵の間で流行っていた歌の歌詞だという新聞コラム記事を読みました。 「戦争で犠牲になるのは若い兵卒ばかり」という風刺を込めた歌詞だといいます。それを彼は、自身の不本意な退任での演説で「魂や功績は生き続ける」との意味に翻案して自負をにじませたとか。 では元歌は、誰の、何という歌なのか、教えてください。

中国の地下鉄が洪水で凄いことになってますが日本の地下鉄は大丈夫でしょうか よろしくお願いしますm(_ _)m

真珠湾攻撃は、無用に真珠湾の人たちをサツリクし開戦しました。 もう月に行こうとしているアメリカに神風特攻するという不毛な争いでした。 欧米から教わった技術で欧米の植民地を奪って回った日本の正当性はゼロ。植民地政策はすでに台湾や南北朝鮮、遼東半島、樺太など日本の領土以上の植民地を持ってましたから「植民地が足らない」ということも無かった。 第二次世界大戦は完全に失敗で葬られた靖国神社の人たちは戦犯という綺麗な言葉ではなく死刑囚だと思います。

　アフガニスタンのアメリカ軍を中心とする統治は結局うまくいきませんでした。やはり民主主義とか人権とか欧米の価値観を全く別な歴史・文化・宗教・習慣を持った社会に押し付けようとしたからだと思います、と当方は思ってきました。いや多くの人がそう思ったはずです。 　しかしこれについて少しばかり疑問が湧いてきました。たとえばベトナム戦争と違うのはベトナムが社会主義で落ち着いたのに比べてアフガニスタンは以後イスラム教で国がうまく統治できるかどうか不安が残るからです。その兆候は既に表れています。ベトナムは社会主義でしかも貧しい国家ではありましたけど例えば女性の人権は建前の上では尊重されていたと思います。社会主義は要するに欧米の価値観のひとつですから。しかしアフガニスタンは違う。結論から言うとやはり何らかの方法でアフガニスタンには「民主主義」や「人権」について教え込む必要があったのではないですか。アメリカのやり方は失敗したわけですからこれに未練を持つのは間違っています。しかしかと言って他に方法がなかったわけでもないと思います。もちろん当方にはその具体的方法は思いつきません。そんなことわかるわけありません。しかし報道されている通りあの国でとんでもない人権侵害が多発しているとしたらまた以後ますます増えていくとしたらどんなに迷惑がられようと「押し付け」も悪くないと思います。アフガニスタンの国家主権は尊重しつつなんとか「押し付け」できないですか。さもないと中国とかが将来的にアフガニスタンに大きな影響力を持つような気がするんですが。

米軍が沖縄から撤退することはありえますかよろしくお願いしますm(_ _)m

ジャンルは問いませんが、お礼に好き嫌いが出るのはご容赦ください。 一度に、3曲以内でお願いします。 誰も出しそうにない曲を一つ上げます（笑）。 「Hey Doctor Man」（クリフリチャード）https://youtu.be/oUlmSi08YWU

明治維新で功労のあった公卿、大名および士族に対しては、賞典禄が授けられました。 しかし、農・工・商に携わる人々のなかには倒幕軍を物心両面で熱烈に支援した人も多数いたと思います。 倒幕軍を資金面で支えた、豪商の力は大きかったのではないでしょうか。 これらの普通の人たちには、何の恩賞もなかったのでしょうか。 金一封はなくても感謝状などは出たのでしょうか。 また、賞典禄の授禄者を決め、そしてその「禄」や「金」を決めた実力者（複数）は、いったい誰だと推定できますか。 よろしくお願いいたします。

私を含めて4500万ぐらいが理想だと思うのですけど。