- ベストアンサー
大学の過去問でわからないところがあります
nevergiveup2004の回答
- nevergiveup2004
- ベストアンサー率54% (23/42)
こんばんは。 答えはseem→seems と思います。 主語はThe risk of...と単数なので。 ちなみに意味は、「発展途上国に対して資金を供給する投資家のリスクは非常に大きいと思われる。」という感じでしょうか。
関連するQ&A
- この英文を訳してください！
この英文を訳してください！ "The exporter must also be prepared to overcome the challenges such as establishing a company presence in the country to which it wants to export, developing sufficient production capacity to manufacture goods for export, coping with the high costs of doing business in other countries, and understanding the way that business is done in the target country."
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳
The approach to teaching may seem unfamil unfamiliar to many peopole from other countries, not only because it is informal, but also because there is iess emphasis on learning facts than is true in the systems of many other countries. 教育するための学習方法は諸外国におくるシステムにおいて事実を学ぶことより… thanのあとには省略がありますか？全然分かりません。よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳の添削をお願いします。
和訳の添削をお願いします。 経済学の内容のため、うまく訳せず困っています。 日本語として不自然な部分や間違った訳し方をしている箇所があれば訂正をお願いします。 本文) When analysing risk, economists make some postulates about economic agents. Investors are assumed to be rational in that they wish to maximize their expected utility which is a positive function of expected real returns and a negative function of the perceived level of risk. The basis of investors’ portfolio decisions is choosing an optimum combination of expected rate of return and risk given their risk-return preferences (degree of risk-aversion). The less risk-averse investors are, the more they will be prepared to take on risk. Conversely, the more risk-averse they are the less risk they will be prepared to take on. 和訳) 危険を分析するとき、経済学者は経済主体について、いくつかの仮定を作ります。彼らが予想される本当の収益のポジティブな作用とリスクの認められたレベルの否定的な機能である彼らの期待される有用性を最大にしたいという点で、投資家は合理的であるとされます。投資家のポートフォリオ決定の基礎は、彼らの危険復帰選好（リスク回避の程度）があれば、予想される利益率とリスクの最適の組合せを選んでいます。リスクを避けようとする投資家がより少ないほど、彼らはより、リスクを引き受ける準備をします。逆に言えば、彼らがより多くのリスクを避けようとするほど、彼らはより少ない危険引き受ける準備ができています。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英語得意な方、和訳お願いします。
英語得意な方、和訳お願いします。 私ではきれいな日本語に訳せませんでした。 金融のお話です。 Looking at the trend in stock (debt), the total market capitalization of stocks increased sharply to \84 trillion ($933 billion at the rate of \90 to the dollar) at the end of 1999 from about \35 trillion ($388 billion) in the previous year. However, in the period following the bursting of the IT bubble to the end of 2002, the balance declined. Although the balance turned upward again toward the end of 2003 due to a recovery in stock prices, increasing to \149 trillion ($1.6 trillion) at the end of 2006, it dropped precipitously in 2008 to \69 trillion ($766 billion) because of the Lehman Shock. In terms of regional breakdown, the share of American investors has risen rapidly from 2007 onward from its previous level up to 2006 of about 41%. The share of European investors, on the other hand, has declined. The total amount of domestic debt securities held by overseas investors, long-and medium-term bonds and notes combined, has increased to approximately \50 trillion ($555 billion) in recent years from \30 trillion ($333 billion).This trend probably reflects the previously mentioned stability in the government bond market and expectations for improvement in bond yields. By region, unlike in the case of stocks, European investors still hold more than 50% of the total despite a downward trend, while American investors continue to hold only around 10%. The foregoing suggests that Europeans tend to favor debt investments in contrast to Americans’ preference for equities
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 英文の和訳をお願いします！！
If the focus on cancer sometimes tilts toward its impact in rich, industrialized nations, statistics show that the disease is a scourge all around the world, with 95 percent of cancer deaths occurring in developing countries. Children in poor countries aren't spared. An estimated 90 percent of children with cancer die in the world's 25 poorest countries, compared with just 12 percent in a wealthy country such as Canada, according to statistics from the Global Task Force on Expanded Access to Cancer Care and Control in Developing Countries. That glaring disparity has mobilized a group of Harvard School of Public Health (HSPS) students. The students, together with the HSPH student government, the student group Students in Latino Public Health, and the Harvard Global Equity Initiative, have put together a half-day event to raise awareness and dispel myths about cancer as a global health issue. The event, scheduled for Friday at the School of Public Health's Kresge Building, marks World Cancer Day on Monday. As part of their commitment, students are also gathering signatures for the World Cancer Declaration by the Union for International Cancer Control, which contains a list of 11 cancer-related health priorities. "There is a lot of difference between what happens in low-income countries and what happens in high-income countries," said HSPH student Sebastián Rodríguez Llamazares. Rodriguez said the effort calls attention to the fact that cancer is a serious problem in poor nations and that steps to prevent or treat it—routine in richer countries—should be part of the global health agenda. Associate Professor of Medicine Felicia Knaul, who heads the Harvard Global Equity Initiative, which supports student World Cancer Day efforts, said there are few cancers whose outcomes are similar in both developed and developing countries. Pancreatic cancer is one, because it's equally deadly everywhere. "For every other cancer that can be treated, the outcomes are very different," said Knaul, a breast cancer survivor. There are several reasons for the disparity. People in poor countries seldom hear messages about lifestyle changes—don't smoke, eat a healthy diet, exercise—that have been shown to prevent cancer. Similarly, a vaccine that can prevent one cancer fatal to women, cervical cancer, is not widely distributed. As a result, 90 percent of cervical cancer cases are found in developing countries, Knaul said.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英検準2級の過去問で・・・
こんばんは。過去問を解いていてよくわからない問題がありました。。 解説もないですし、よかったらどなたかわかりやすい説明をお願いします！！ 1. Keith's acting in the school play was excellent. Several of his classmates (came) up to him afterward and told him how much they liked it. （ ）の部分が答えなんですが、この文のいい訳を教えてください。 come up to を辞書で調べましたが、なんかしっくりきません。。 2. Miho wil be (moving) to Nagoya next month to start a new job. 自分の答えは合っていましたが、どうしてmovingになるのかいまいちわかりません。説明をお願いします！！
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 添削お願いします（大学過去問）
大学の過去問の英作文を解いているのですが、今、学校が閉まっていて先生に添削していただけなくて、困っています。 どれか１つでもいいので、どなたか添削お願いします。 (1)ヨーロッパ諸国では自国語のほかに外国語を１つか２つ身につけているのが普通であり、 決して驚くことではない。 In Europe countries, it is usual that they master one or two languages but their mother tongue, so it is never surprising. (2)田舎へ移ってから３年以上になりますが、老父母もすっかり健康を取り戻したように見える。 It is over three years since we have moved to the country, but my old parents appears to have completely recovered their health. (3)ここからあの山のふもとまでは少なくとも４０分かかるよ。近いようだが実際はかなり遠いんだ。(ふもと→a foot) It takes forty minutes at least from here to a foot of that mountain. It seems to be near, but in fact it is very far.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 【和訳】和訳をお願いします。
国連の世界貿易レポートを読んでいるのですが、イマイチ理解できません。 大変長い文章ですが、和訳していただけませんでしょうか。 どうかよろしくお願いします。 As noted above, GVC participation – or the role that individual countries play in international production networks – is driven by many different factors, from size of the economy to industrial structure and level of industrialization, composition of exports and positioning in value chains, policy elements, and others. As a result, countries with very different characteristics may be very similar in the ranking of GVC participation (figure IV.9). The GVC participation of many countries relates substantially to GVC interactions within their respective regions. Instead of a global reach, most value chains have a distinctive regional character, as shown in figure IV.10. North and Central American value chain links are especially strong, as are intra- European Union ones. The largest extraregional bilateral GVC flows are between Germany and the United States, China and Germany, and Japan and the United States, in that order. The share of global value added trade captured by developing economies is increasing rapidly. It grew from about 20 per cent in 1990, to 30 per cent in 2000, to over 40 per cent in 2010. As a group, developing and transition economies are capturing an increasing share of the global value added trade pie (figure IV.11). As global trade grows, developed economies appear to rely increasingly on imported content for their exports, allowing developing countries to add disproportionately to their domestic value added in exports. Some of the larger emerging markets, such as India, Brazil, Argentina and Turkey, have relatively low GVC participation rates. These countries may have lower upstream participation levels, both because of the nature of their exports (natural resources and services exports tend to have less need for imported content or foreign value added) and because larger economies display a greater degree of self-sufficiency in production for exports. They may also have lower downstream participation levels because of a focus on exports of so-called final-demand goods and services, i.e. those not used as intermediates in exports to third countries. Investment and trade are inextricably intertwined. Much of trade in natural resources is driven by large cross-border investments in extractive industries by globally operating TNCs. Market-seeking foreign direct investment (FDI) by TNCs also generates trade, often shifting arm’slength trade to intra-firm trade. Efficiency-seeking FDI, through which firms seek to locate discrete parts of their production processes in low-cost locations, is particularly associated with GVCs; it increases the amount of trade taking place within the international production networks of TNCs and contributes to the “double counting” in global trade flows discussed in this report.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語