国家主導のグローバル連携資本主義における産業の妥協

このQ&Aのポイント
  • 国家主導のグローバルな連携で結ばれた資本主義は、産業内部での固有の妥協点であり、グローバルな統合と統合の圧力と戦略的に重要な部門への政府の支配権との緊張関係の中に存在しています。
  • Haberly (2011)によれば、この状態主導のグローバルな連携資本主義は、グローバルな統合と統合の圧力と、複数の政府が戦略的に重要な部門に対する主権を主張するという緊張関係の中で生まれたものです。
  • Haberly (2011)は論文で指摘しているように、この国家主導のグローバルな連携資本主義は、グローバルな統合と統合への圧力と、複数の政府が戦略的に重要な部門に対する主権を主張するという緊張関係の中で、産業内部での妥協点として存在しています。
回答を見る
  • ベストアンサー

英文の邦訳の添削を願います。

As noted in Haberly (2011), this state-led global alliance capitalism is a characteristic compromise within industries under tension between the pressure for global integration and consolidation, and the desire of multiple governments to assert sovereignty over a sector seen as strategically important. 以上の英文の以下の試訳の添削をお願いします。 「Haberly (2011)が述べたように,この国家主導的なグローバルな連携で結ばれた資本主義は,グローバルな融合と統合への圧力と,戦略上重要視されている部門に対する支配権を主張する複数の政府の欲求との間の緊張関係下,産業内部での固有の妥協点である。」尚出典は,Daniel Haberly, Dariusz Wójcik (2017), “Earth Incorporated: Centralization and Variegation in the Global Company Network,” Economic Geography, Volume 93, Number 3, pp.240-266.です。

  • jubu
  • お礼率86% (919/1061)
  • 英語
  • 回答数1
  • ありがとう数2

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • Nakay702
  • ベストアンサー率80% (9727/12099)
回答No.1

完璧なお訳と拝見しました! ほとんど不要ながら、ひと言だけ述べること、というか、探すことがあるとすれば、compromise「妥協点」を「妥協の結果」または「妥協の産物」とすれば、ほんの少しだけ良くなるかも知れません。 (添削文) 《Haberly (2011) が指摘したように、このグローバルな国家主導の連携で結ばれた資本主義は、グローバルな融合と統合への圧力と、戦略上重要視されている部門に対する支配権を主張する複数の政府の欲求との間の緊張関係下における、産業内部特有の妥協の産物である。》

jubu
質問者

お礼

有難うございました。

jubu
質問者

補足

いつも有難う存じます。安心致しました。確かに妥協点よりは妥協の産物の方が適訳ですね。 感謝申しあげます。

関連するQ&A

  • 英文の邦訳

    Specifically, ever-larger fund managers are increasingly trapped in a paradox between the need to play an active corporate governance role commensurate with their size and the potential abyss of antitrust action. In this respect, managers, such as BlackRock and Vanguard, are at risk of following in the footsteps of JP Morgan’s Money Trust. This conflict may not come to a head given the paradoxical dependence of passive funds on a surrounding ecosystem of market fluidity and speculation (although Morgan, notably, had a similar ecological dependence; see De Long 1992). 以上の英文の後半の,This conflict may not 以降の邦訳をお願い致します。 原典は,ISSN: 0013-0095 (Print) 1944-8287 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/recg20 Earth Incorporated: Centralization and Variegation in the Global Company Network Daniel Haberly & Dariusz Wójcik To cite this article: Daniel Haberly & Dariusz Wójcik (2017) Earth Incorporated: Centralization and Variegation in the Global Company Network, Economic Geography, 93:3, 241-266, DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1267561 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1267561 です。 以上どうぞ宜しくお願い申し上げます。

  • 英文の邦訳

    Long an object of managerial discretion, corporate philanthropy has been used as a form of public relations similar to advertising, an attempt to invest strategically in areas that will benefit the firm (such as schools), a response to social pressures within the business community, and even a reflection of the company's values. この文章の冒頭のLong an object of managerial discretionの一節の意味が分かりません。お分かりの方,邦訳を宜しくお願いします。

  • 英文の邦訳

    The described and attributed strategies of states as owners in the global network of state capital are a first step in this direction: we develop this contribution by distinguishing broadly between state strategies that show a clear interest in financial returns on investment (and thus more adaptation to transnational capitalism), and others that predominantly seek to control the firms they invest their state capital in (and thus carry the potential for a more state-controlled form of global expansion). Our results hence implicate that tackling the question of adaptation or challenge need to be answered at the level of state strategies. 上記英文のラストのOur以下を御訳しください。

  • 英文の邦訳の添削

    Even while “taking the democratization of investing to a whole new level” (Bernard 2018), this final evolution of asset management into a free service, provided through cross-subsidized platforms, is expected to intensify an already-ongoing industry shake-out and consolidation—with only a handful of the largest providers seen as likely to survive (at least in the retail market; Kaissar 2018). One potential precedent for the evolution of asset management may be the news industry, which has become bifurcated between elite outlets—who can convince customers to pay a premium for original content—and free online sites which aggregate and re-digest information from other sources. 以上の英文の下記の試訳の添削をお願いします。 「「新しいレベル全体への投資の一端を担う」(Bernard 2018)他方,アセット・マネジメントのサービス自由化へのこの最終発展は,赤字部門に採算部門の利益を投じるプラットフォームによって生み出され,それは,すでに続いている産業の統廃合を強化するよう期待され,(少なくとも,小売り市場では;Kaissar 2018)ほんの一握りの最大級の供給者だけが存続する可能性が高い。アセット・マネジメントの発展に関する潜在的な先例のひとつは,選りすぐりの分岐間に分かれるようになった(エリート間に分かれた)新規産業であるかも知れず,彼らは,本来の内容に即したプレミアムを顧客に支払うよう納得しうるであろう。」

  • 添削してください

    Post war economic boomについての文です。 Many Americans feared that the end of World War II and the subsequent drop in military spending might bring back the hard times of the Great Depression. But instead, pent-up consumer demand fueled exceptionally strong economic growth in the post-war period. The automobile industry successfully converted back to producing cars, and new industries such as aviation and electronics grew by leaps and bounds. ⇨Many Americans feared that the end of World War II and the subsequent drop in military spending might bring back the hard times of the Great Depression. But instead, consumer demand became exceptionally strong economic growth in the post-war period. The new industries such as automobile industry, aviation and electronics grew by leaps and bounds. ⇨以降の文を私が短く作り直しました。ですので、こちらの文の添削をして欲しいです。 もし、ここも省いていいよ、などあればそちらも教えて欲しいです。 よろしくお願いします。

  • 添削してください

    アメリカのキッチン討論?についての文章です。 On July 24, 1959, during the grand opening ceremony of the American National Exhibition in Moscow, Vice President Richard Nixon and Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev engage in a heated debate about capitalism and communism in the middle of a model kitchen set up for the fair. They held a public discussion comparing the technologies of the two powers. In the debate they discussed household items such as color televisions and in the process reviewed differences in ideology and the quality of life in both countries for the average citizen. ⇨On July 24, 1959, during the grand opening ceremony of the American National Exhibition in Moscow, Vice President Richard Nixon and Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev engage in a heated debate about capitalism and communism in the middle of a model kitchen set up for the fair. They held a public discussion comparing the technologies of the two powers. In the debate they discussed household items and in the process reviewed differences in ideology. ⇨以降を私なりに短くまとめてみたのですが、こちらの文を添削して欲しいです。 もし、もっと簡単にできるよ、などこの文は省いてもいいんじゃない?などあればそちらも教えて欲しいです。 よろしくお願いします。

  • 英文内容の明らかな矛盾の解釈

    In contrast, in the Veblenian double movement, a predominantly Darwinian evolutionary impulse toward marketization buckles under the weight of the institutions that protect the market from society—with society understood broadly to refer to the entire array of actually existing human limitations and idiosyncrasies. 以上の英文の以下の試訳がほぼ間違いないとすると,明らかに内容が矛盾しているように思われます。 「これとは対照的に,――実質的に全て出揃った一連の既存の人間的制約と独自性に係わるものとして広範に理解できる社会――〔その〕社会から市場を守ろうとする制度の圧力を受けて,主として,市場化〔市場構造は,不安定なDarwin的様式で生起する傾向がある 〕に向けたDarwin的な漸進的な推進力は,Veblen的な二重運動の中で歪む」 。 ここでは主部で,市場を守る制度の圧力を受けて,とありながら,述部で,市場化が歪む,とあります。試訳も含めて,この点を如何解釈すべきか,何方か,お教え下さい。出典は,Daniel Haberly, Dariusz Wójcik (2017), “Earth Incorporated: Centralization and Variegation in the Global Company Network,” Economic Geography, Volume 93, Number 3, pp.240-266.です。 以上,宜しくお願いします。

  • 英文を簡単にして欲しいです。

    The States' Rights Democratic Party was a short-lived segregationist political party in the United States. It originated in 1948 as a breakaway faction of the Democratic Party determined to protect states' rights to legislate racial segregation from what its members regarded as an oppressive federal government. Supporters assumed control of the state Democratic parties in part or in full in several Southern states. The Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. こちらの文を短くして欲しいです。 States' Rights Party (Dixiecrats)について説明している文をまとめてみたのですが、あまりにも長くなってしまいました。 この情報はいらないんじゃない?とか、この単語はもう少し簡単に表現できる、などあれば教えて欲しいです。 よろしくお願いいたします。

  • 英文(長文)の添削お願いします。

    Santa Claus of The World Do you know a legendary character who is said to deliver presents for children at Christmas, called Santa Claus? Santa Claus is popular among children. A model of Santa Claus is a person called St.Nicolaus. As he was a pious Christian, he gave money to poor persons and helped persons in difficulties. Santa Claus we know today was originated from such a spirit. By the way, do you know that there are various Santa Claus in the world? First, I explain American Santa Claus. The characteristic of American Santa Claus, pump and cheerful, grow a while mustache, wrap the body in red and white hat and clothes with a black belt. He gets on the sled pulled by reindeers and enters a home from a stovepipe. Japanese Santa Clause thought almost same as that in America. In Australia, because this time is summer, Santa Claus wear in the short-sleeved shorts of these clothes. And a sled is pulled by kangaroos instead of reindeers. Next, I easily explain other Santa Claus. Russian Santa Claus is called Moroz. Surprisingly, once he was a bad magician who took away children and held him to presents. However, as time passed, he reformed himself and he came to distribute presents to make up for his bad behave. Spanish Santa Claus is called Befana. She is a cheerful old witch, full of curiosity for age and has been work for long time to make pleasant toys. In addition, there are some Santa Claus who varies in an appearance and character. There are Santa Claus of children, too. Why don’t you check about them who makes many people happy? 文やまとめ方が変な場合は指摘をおねがいします。言い換えた方がいいところも。 構成的に1.これから書く文の導入、2.アメリカとそれに似ているサンタについて、3.その他のサンタについて、4.まとめにしてあります。 まとめは何かけばいいか思いつかなかったのでまとまっていないと思います(汗

  • 英文を日本語訳して下さい。

    Whereas all of the above measures were broadly popular, across most of the political spectrum, the same was not true of the proposal to amend Article 32. Said article had not been amended in the overhaul of 1868, and its text had remained unchanged since the original constitution of 1848, stating unequivocally that all sovereignty resided in the person of the Grand Duchess. For some, particularly those that resented the close relations between Marie-Adélaïde and the German royalty, the idea of national sovereignty residing in such a person was unacceptable. The Chamber of Deputies voted to review Article 32, but Kauffmann refused to allow it, seeing the redefinition of the source of national sovereignty as covert republicanism.