- ベストアンサー
民主主義の横暴で幹細胞研究や動物実験が翻弄される
- 民主主義の横暴で幹細胞研究や動物実験が翻弄されているが、そのメリットは何か?
- EUの『One of Us』請願はヒト胚性幹細胞の破壊を禁止し、中絶支援を妨害することを求めている。
- ヨーロッパ委員会は『One of Us』イニシアティブに対する報告書を作成する必要があるが、その必要性が疑問視されている。
- みんなの回答 (2)
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
- ベストアンサー
その他の回答 (1)
- bakansky
- ベストアンサー率48% (3502/7245)
関連するQ&A
- 民主主義はぐるぐる回る(2)
続きです。 (5)The 2010 animal legislation represented a hard-fought-for compromise that was agreed by EU member states and the European Parliament only after more than a decade of debate involving consultation with all sides. この文章でのonly after more than a decade of debate involving consultation with all sides. のonlyの意味が分かりません。 たった十年と訳しましたがリアルな意味で短いよ!たったの十年さ。 といっているのかあるいは超皮肉的な言い回しなのか。それとも全然違う意味のonlyなのかわかりません。 2010年の動物実験の法律に対して10年以上もかかったといっているからやはり民主主義のマイノリティーな批判を相手にするのはいかがなものかと連続的に筆者が言っていることからやはり皮肉なonlyなのでしょうか。 (6)The even-more-recent legislation on funding of research with human embryonic stem cells also represents a compromise in which all sides, including the representatives of One of Us, had their say. (5)に続く文章です。 ヒト胚性幹細胞の研究基金の最新の法律も我々の一人運動を含む問題において妥協を示してきたと彼らは言った。 でしょうか? ここで毎度議論にたいして compromise が汎用されているのですがここでのcompromiseは妥協してきた。本来の意図にそぐわない結果。 として考えていますが違いますでしょうか。あと最後のhad their sayの意味がよくわかりません。ここでのthierは科学者たちのことでしょうか? (6)Worse, the commission’s report will of necessity have to repeat the arguments that led to the 2013 decision to fund some research using human embryonic stem cells, again reflecting that a majority supported the compromise. That opens the door to allegations that the EU invites ECIs — and then ignores them. のagain reflecting that a majority supported the compromise. That opens the door to allegations that the EU invites ECIs — and then ignores them. が分かりませんでした。その前述で委員会は当然実験に対して過去に出したような同じ謳い文句で主張するしかない。と言っていますが、またしても妥協ばかりでまとまった法案になるということを言っているのでしょうか。 長くなりましたがご指導お願い申し上げます。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳をお願いします。
They were also surrounded by territories controlled by Britain, France, Belgium and Portugal.Colonial military forces in Africa were relatively small, poorly equipped and had been created to maintain internal order, rather than conduct military operations against other colonial forces. Most of the European warfare in Africa during the 19th century had been conducted against African societies to enslave people and later to conquer territory. The Berlin Conference of 1884, had provided for European colonies in Africa to be neutral, if war broke out in Europe; in 1914 none of the European powers had plans to challenge their opponents for control of overseas colonies. When news of the outbreak of war reached European colonialists in Africa, it was met by little of the enthusiasm seen in the capital cities of the states which maintained colonies. An editorial in the East African Standard on 22 August, argued that Europeans in Africa should not fight each other but instead collaborate, to maintain the repression of the indigenous population. War was against the interest of the white colonialists because they were small in number, many of the European conquests were recent, unstable and operated through existing local structures of power and the organisation of African economic potential for European profit had only recently begun.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文を訳して下さい。
As foreign minister Briand formulated an original proposal for a new economic union of Europe. Described as Briand's Locarno diplomacy and as an aspect of Franco-German rapprochement, it was his answer to Germany's quick economic recovery and future political power. Briand made his proposals in a speech in favor of a European Union in the League of Nations on 5 September 1929, and in 1930, in his "Memorandum on the Organization of a Regime of European Federal Union" for the Government of France. The idea was to provide a framework to contain France's former enemy while preserving as much of the 1919 Versailles settlement as possible. The Briand plan entailed the economic collaboration of the great industrial areas of Europe and the provision of political security to Eastern Europe against Soviet threats. The basis was economic cooperation, but his fundamental concept was political, for it was political power that would determine economic choices. The plan, under the Memorandum on the Organization of a System of European Federal Union, was in the end presented as a French initiative to the League of Nations. With the death of his principal supporter, German foreign minister Gustav Stresemann, and the onset of the Great Depression in 1929, Briand's plan was never adopted but it suggested an economic framework for developments after World War II that eventually resulted in the European Union.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文解釈 (The Economist) で分からないところがあるのですが
次の文章の後半にあります、 able to ~ なのですが、何が省略されていて、どこに掛かっているかが分からず、困っています。文章の意味は大体つかめるのですが、細部の理解も完全にしたいと思い、質問させていただく次第です。よろしくお願いします。 The European Union’s leaders, meeting in Brussels on June 18th and 19th, agreed that financial institutions in the 27-country block should be subject to common rules and overseen by new EU-level supervisors able to make binding rulings in disputes between national regulators. (The Economist, Jun 19th 2009)
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- これらの文がうまく訳せなくて困っています。
これらの文がうまく訳せなくて困っています。助けてください。よろしくお願いします。 Schumacher saw German unity as a precondition for the unification of Europe, and in the long run be was correct: the unification of Germany in 1990 became the basis for the ‘enlargement’ of the European Union towards the East that took place later in 2004-7. As long as Germany remained split, Europe was divided. The Minister of the Interior, Gustav Heinemann, resigned on account of the policy of German rearmament that actually meant the militarization of the Federal Republic. Heinemann considered peace in Europe to be threatened by this and saw a deepening in the division of Germany.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 以下の英文を日本語訳して下さい。
German colonies in Africa had been acquired in the 1880s and were not well defended. They were also surrounded by territories controlled by Britain, France, Belgium and Portugal.Colonial military forces in Africa were relatively small, poorly equipped and had been created to maintain internal order, rather than conduct military operations against other colonial forces. Most of the European warfare in Africa during the 19th century had been conducted against African societies to enslave people and later to conquer territory. The Berlin Conference of 1884, had provided for European colonies in Africa to be neutral, if war broke out in Europe; in 1914 none of the European powers had plans to challenge their opponents for control of overseas colonies. When news of the outbreak of war reached European colonialists in Africa, it was met by little of the enthusiasm seen in the capital cities of the states which maintained colonies. An editorial in the East African Standard on 22 August, argued that Europeans in Africa should not fight each other but instead collaborate, to maintain the repression of the indigenous population. War was against the interest of the white colonialists because they were small in number, many of the European conquests were recent, unstable and operated through existing local structures of power and the organisation of African economic potential for European profit had only recently begun. In Britain, an Offensive sub-committee of the Committee of Imperial Defence was appointed on 5 August and established a principle that command of the seas was to be ensured and that objectives were considered only if they could be attained with local forces and if the objective assisted the priority of maintaining British sea communications, as British army garrisons abroad were returned to Europe in an "Imperial Concentration". Attacks on German coaling stations and wireless stations were considered to be important to clear the seas of German commerce raiders. Objectives at Tsingtau in the Far East and Luderitz Bay, Windhoek, Duala and Dar-es-Salaam in Africa and a German wireless station in Togoland, next to the British colony of Gold Coast in the Gulf of Guinea, were considered vulnerable to attack by local or allied forces.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英語が得意な方 和訳を助けてください。
英語が得意な方 和訳を助けてください。うまく訳せなくて困っています。よろしくお願いします The industrial unions demanded to be embedded within legislation going beyond the co-determination set by the European Coal and Steel Community, even for the economic co-determination of employees at the higher levels of the companies.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 解らない英文があります
Bernard ShawのThe Doctor's Dilemmaの最初のページを読んでおり、以下の文でつまずいてしまいました。 "That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg, is enough to make one despair of political humanity" おそらくこの文章を理解できない原因は、'should go on to give a surgeon ...'の主語がわからないことだと考えています(any sane nationが主語だと思うのですが)。 そこで、今回お聞きしたいのは、shouldに対応する主語とこの文章の日本語訳です。 どうぞよろしくお願い致します。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文を日本語訳して下さい。
Preparations for operations in Flanders began in 1915, with the doubling of the Hazebrouck–Ypres rail line and the building of a new line from Bergues–Proven which was doubled in early 1917. Progress on roads, rail lines, railheads and spurs in the Second Army zone was continuous and by mid-1917, gave the area the most efficient supply system of the BEF. Several plans and memoranda for a Flanders offensive were produced between January 1916 and May 1917, in which the writers tried to relate the offensive resources available to the terrain and the likely German defence. In early 1916, the importance of the capture of the Gheluvelt plateau for an advance further north was emphasised by Haig and the army commanders. On 14 February 1917, Colonel C. N. Macmullen of GHQ proposed that the plateau be taken by a mass tank attack, reducing the need for artillery; in April a reconnaissance by Captain G. le Q Martel found that the area was unsuitable for tanks. On 9 February, General Rawlinson, commander of the Fourth Army, suggested that Messines Ridge could be taken in one day and that the capture of the Gheluvelt plateau should be fundamental to the attack further north. He suggested that the southern attack from St. Yves to Mont Sorrel should come first and that Mont Sorrel to Steenstraat should be attacked within 48–72 hours. After discussions with Rawlinson and Plumer and the incorporation of Haig's changes, Macmullen submitted his memorandum on 14 February. With amendments the memorandum became the GHQ 1917 plan. A week after the Battle of Messines Ridge, Haig gave his objectives to his Army commanders: wearing out the enemy, securing the Belgian coast and connecting with the Dutch frontier by the capture of Passchendaele ridge, followed by an advance on Roulers and Operation Hush, an attack along the coast with an amphibious landing. If manpower and artillery were insufficient, only the first part of the plan might be fulfilled. On 30 April, Haig told Gough the Fifth Army commander, that he would lead the "Northern Operation" and the coastal force, although Cabinet approval for the offensive was not granted until 21 June.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 大学の英文和訳の添削をお願いします。
(問) While a survey reported in 2001 that 71% of Europeans felt that everyone in the European Union(EU) should be able to speak one European language in addition to their mother tongue, and almost the same proportion agreed that this language should be English, 63% also believed that their own language needed to be protected. (私の解答)2001年の調査で、71%のヨーロッパ人が、EUの人々が母国語のほかにもう一つヨーロッパの言語を話せるようになるべきであり、ほぼ同じ比率の人々が、その言語は英語であるべきだと同意する一方で、63%の人々がまた、自分たちの言語を守る必要があると信じている。 (模範解答)2001年にある調査が報告したところによると、ヨーロッパ人の71%が欧州連合(EU)域内のだれもが母語に加えてヨーロッパの言語をもう一つ話せるのが望ましいと感じており、ほぼ同じ割合の人々がその言語としては英語が望ましいという点で意見が一致していたが、63%の人々は自分たちの言語が守られる必要があるとも考えていた。 2001年の調査で~に続く述語部分がないことと、最後の「信じている」の時制がおかしいところ、「欧州連合」を訳し忘れているところは自覚しております。ほかにどこかおかしいところや不自然なところがありましたらご指摘いただきたいです。 また、回答者様の主観で構いませんので、10点満点だとして私の解答だと何割ぐらい取れるか教えて頂けると嬉しいですm(__)m だいたいでいいので、よろしくお願いします!
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
お礼
いつもご指導ありがとうございます。 この文章を読んでいてびっくりしたのですがヨーロッパではES細胞に関する運動が本当に活発化しているんですね。 日本で「ESもiPSも罪だ!!」だとか言って国会に乗り込む人だとかは全く見受けられないのでやはり宗教だとか根本的な問題も相当量海外ではベクトルが高いのかなと思いました。 本当に丁寧な訳と質問に対するご指導ありがとうございました。 4番の訳に関しては自分の訳が悩ましいところでしたのでおかげさまで意味を理解することができました。