国際法の教科書の文章の自然な日本語訳をお願いします

このQ&Aのポイント
  • 国際法の教科書での文章を自然な日本語に訳す作業です
  • 文中に登場する国際組織が行う行政行為や立法行為に対して、法の対象者が抗議や申し立てを行うことができることは合理的です
  • 国際機関が行う行政行為や立法行為に対して、当該組織の法的な対象者が抗議や申し立てを行うことができることは合理的である
回答を見る
  • ベストアンサー

自然な日本語訳をお願いいたします。

国際法の教科書を訳す作業で、どうしても以下の文章が自分の力で訳せません。よろしくお願いいたします。自然な日本語でお願いします。 If and where international organizations perform administrative acts or adopt legislative acts, it makes sense if the various subjects of the law of that particular organization can protest or appeal against those administrative or legislative acts.

  • 英語
  • 回答数2
  • ありがとう数0

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
noname#175206
noname#175206
回答No.2

「何らかの国際機関が行政行為や議会立法行為を行う場合、その国際機関自身が有する法のさまざまな条文により、そうした行政行為や議会立法に反対して抗議したり、司法提訴することができる場合に限り、その国際機関の行為は有効性を持つ。」 「どういった国際機関であれ、その機関を律する法のあらゆる条文に基づいて、その機関が行おうとする行政行為や立法行為に異議を唱え、あるいは司法提訴できることが必要である。」 といったところかと思います。

その他の回答 (1)

  • d-y
  • ベストアンサー率46% (1528/3312)
回答No.1

国際機関が行政行為や立法行為を行う場合には、その国際機関の法によって規制される様々な対象者がそれらの行政行為や立法行為に対して異議や上訴を行えるようにするのが、理に適っている。

関連するQ&A

  • 英文の訳

    長い英文ですが、どなたか訳してもらえないでしょうか? Many articles and books describe new methods and tools that may make your organization or project more productive and your products better and cheaper. But it is difficult to separate the claims from the reality. Many organizations perform experiments, run case studies or administer surveys to help them decide whether a method or tool is likely to make a positive difference in their particular situations. These investigations cannot be done without careful, controlled measurement and analysis. As we will see in Chapter 4, an evaluation’s success depends on good experimental design, proper identification of the factors likely to affect the outcome, and appropriate measurement of factor attributes.

  • 日本語訳お願いします。

    以下は遺伝子組み換えの問題性に関する文章の一部です。この部分だけがわからなかったので日本語訳 お願いします。 (1) Various scares, the best known being mad cow disease, have consumers in Europe cautious of food genetically altered to kill pests or resist herbicides また、文章でgrassroots campaignっていうのがありましたのですが、これはどういう意味ですか? ・・・・・・ 以下はまた別の英文です。 (2) According to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, mandatory labeling applies to all foods that have been changed nutritionally or compositionally or to alert consumers of possible allergens.That does not mean,though,that all GM foods will be labeled.If it can be show through tests that the nutrition or composition of such foods remains unchanged, no special label is required. Even though labels are not required ,they are allowed ,but only when `truthful and not misleading`. おそらく上記の英文は成分表示をラベルにして張ることの是非が述べられてるというのは想像がつくの ですが、きちんとした具体的な訳までがわかりません。 長い文章ですが、訳していただけないでしょうか?

  • 日本語訳をお願いします。

    大事なメールが届いたのですが、英語のため理解できませんでした。 よろしければどなたか日本語訳をお願い致します。 We found that your app only provides a very limited set of features. It does not provide e-Book functionality such as bookmark and other appropriate features. While we value simplicity, we consider simplicity to be uncomplicated - not limited in features and functionality. We understand that there are no hard and fast rules to define useful or entertaining, but Apple and Apple customers expect apps to provide a really great user experience. Apps should provide valuable utility or entertainment, draw people in with by offering compelling capabilities or content, or enable people to do something they couldn't do before or in a way they couldn't do it before. We encourage you to review your app concept and evaluate whether you can incorporate additional content and features to be in compliance with the Guidelines. For information on the basics of creating great apps, watch the video The Ingredients of Great Apps.If you feel we didn't understand the features of your app, or that we missed key functionality, and your app was incorrectly rejected, you may appeal to the App Review Board.

  • 日本語訳を!!

    お願いします (8) The plebs still complained that there were no written laws. And a poor-but-free man whoowed money could still be forced into slavery if he couldn't pay his debts. So the plebs left the city again about 450 BCE. This protest finally convinced the Senate to create a written set of laws: the Twelve Tables. These laws set down, in writing, the accepted practices of the day. They didn't get to the root of the trouble between patricians and the discontented poor. The poor were still not treated as equals to the landowning rich. But the Twelve Tables were, at least, a start. (9) The twelve Tables were completed in 450 BCE. At some point─no one knows exactly when─they were inscribed on 12 bronze tables that were set up in the Forum for everyone to see. About a third of these early laws have survived because they were copied down by later writers. The others have been lost. The laws that we know about cover all sorts of crimes and conditions. Table 7, for example, decreed that if a road was not in good condition, a man could legally drive his oxen across someone else's fields. Table 8 dealt with a more serious question: whether a homeowner had the right to kill a burglar who broke into his house. According to Roman law, he did─but only if the burglar came at night or if a daytime burglar was armed and tried to defend himself. (10) Many of the laws make sense. For example, a property owner could be forced to trim his trees so that his neighbors would get sunlight. And if someone stole money, he could not be forced to repay more than three times the amount that he stole. But others seem incredibly harsh: for example,capital punishment for a person who sang an insulting song or lied in court. But all Roman citizens had the right to appeal to the Assembly to reverse a death sentence.

  • 英文と日本語訳があります。日本語訳は正しいですか?

    Detailed regulations for important groups or classes underpinned the Tokugawa administrative system. Such regulations took the form of basic codes which were reaffirmed and sometimes revised at the accession of each new shogun. One set, issued between 1601 and 1616 and known collectively as the regulations for Buddhist monasteries (jiin hatto), left doctrine and internal sect organization largely in the hands of the clergy, but made aggressive propaganda an offense and put the management and taxation of temple estates under bakufu supervision. These and later rules for religious houses were enforced by an important group of bakufu officials, the temple magistrates(jisha bugyo). Such legislation made Buddhism, and Shinto, completely dependent on Tokugawa protection. 和訳 重要なグループもしくは階級に対する細部にわたる法度は、徳川の統治システムを支えた。 こうした法度は、各新将軍の即位時に再確認され時には差し替えられる基本法令という形を取っていた。1601年から1616年の間に発布され、仏教の僧院の為の規制(寺院法度)として知られているものは、仏教の教義と内部宗派の運営を広く僧侶の管理下に残したが、幕府の監視下でひとつの違反を攻撃的宣伝に使って寺領への管理と租税を加えた。こうした各宗の対する法度と後に加えられた規則は、幕府の役人の中でも重要なグループである、寺を裁く者(寺社奉行)によって強化された。そのような法律が完全に徳川の庇護に依存する仏教と神道を作ったのだ。

  • 日本語訳お願いします

    よくわかりません。日本語に訳してください。よろしくお願いします。 When we use terms such as "lose's one's virginity" in referring to adult sex acts with children instead of calling it "rape," or when we say that teachers "have affairs" with their pupils instead of saying that the teachers sexually exploit them, the only beneficiaries are the predators who target children. This is not about political correctness. It is about telling the truth. In any culture, language is the undercurrent that drives the river of public perception. That undercurrent has been polluted for too long. If we really want to protect our children, it's time to watch our language. When it comes to child abuse, the language we use can distort the reality of the crime and create a roadblock to justice. The next time you hear a news report, keep in mind what the following terms actually mean … and the consequences of the conduct described.

  • 日本語訳をお願いします!!

    The golden fields of summer stretch endlessly across the prairies of Saskatchewan.The bread basket of Canada,Saskatchewan is prime wheat country the size of Texas,and one of the great wheat-growing regions of the world.But the financial demands of the family farm are changing,and it has become difficult for the new generation of farmers to prosper.“Farming would be the ultimatd way to spend your life but there are strings attached just like any other business,people have other jobs.But if you cannot viably raise a family,it doesn't matter how much you like it or enjoy it.”One group of committed farmers is making the cooperative farm succed for them.Similar in many ways to the Mennonites and the Amish,the Hutterites originated in Moravia in the 16th century.After settling in various countries of eastern Europe,and the United States,each time fleeing persecution,the Hutterites emigrated to Canada in the early 20th century.The families have clung tenaciously to their religious beliefs,ancestral German dialect,and the customs of their forefathers.A brave and stalwart spirit has served them well:Hutterite farms are among the most productive in the land.

  • termの意味文の訳です。

    term の英英辞書の意味文がよくわかりません。 [PHRASE] If you talk about something in terms of something or in particular terms, you are specifying which aspect of it you are discussing or from what point of view you are considering it. 『もし、何かについて” in terms of something”とか”in particular terms”等と話すなら、論じていてることの観点とか、考えていることはどの観点から来ているのかを特定していることになる』と感覚的に理解するのですが‥‥。文の構造がわからないので適当です。 which aspect of it you are discussing →あなたが論じている その、どの局面であるか from what point of view you are considering it →あなたがそれを論じているのはどの観点からか これら、which とwhatには 先行詞がありませんが、関係代名詞でしょうか?? どうぞよろしくお願いします。

  • 英文を日本語訳して下さい。

    In Article 231 Germany accepted responsibility for the losses and damages caused by the war "as a consequence of the ... aggression of Germany and her allies." [nb 2] The treaty required Germany to compensate the Allied powers, and it also established an Allied "Reparation Commission" to determine the exact amount which Germany would pay and the form that such payment would take. The commission was required to "give to the German Government a just opportunity to be heard", and to submit its conclusions by 1 May 1921. In the interim, the treaty required Germany to pay an equivalent of 20 billion gold marks ($5 billion) in gold, commodities, ships, securities or other forms. The money would help to pay for Allied occupation costs and buy food and raw materials for Germany. To ensure compliance, the Rhineland and bridgeheads east of the Rhine were to be occupied by Allied troops for fifteen years. If Germany had not committed aggression, a staged withdrawal would take place; after five years, the Cologne bridgehead and the territory north of a line along the Ruhr would be evacuated. After ten years, the bridgehead at Coblenz and the territories to the north would be evacuated and after fifteen years remaining Allied forces would be withdrawn. If Germany reneged on the treaty obligations, the bridgeheads would be reoccupied immediately. International organizations Main articles: Covenant of the League of Nations and International Labour Organization § History Part I of the treaty, as per all the treaties signed during the Paris Peace Conference,[nb 3] was the Covenant of the League of Nations, which provided for the creation of the League, an organization for the arbitration of international disputes. Part XIII organized the establishment of the International Labour Officer, to regulate hours of work, including a maximum working day and week; the regulation of the labour supply; the prevention of unemployment; the provision of a living wage; the protection of the worker against sickness, disease and injury arising out of his employment; the protection of children, young persons and women; provision for old age and injury; protection of the interests of workers when employed abroad; recognition of the principle of freedom of association; the organization of vocational and technical education and other measures. The treaty also called for the signatories to sign or ratify the International Opium Convention.

  • 訳出願い

    知恵をお貸しください。 I'd say if you were working with an organization and there's choice between the goal of that organization, or the particular program they are working on, and educating people, developing people, helping them grow, helping them become able to analyzeーif there's a choice, we'd sacrifice the goal of the organization for helping the people grow, because we think in the long run it is a bigger contribution. (1)文法構造が理解できません。i'd sayの後の「if」は名詞節という認識でいいのでしょうか?また、棒線の次の「if」は副詞節ととらえて問題のないでしょうか? (2)訳出お願いします。