- ベストアンサー
続くものはどれになるでしょうか
literature professorがcriticsの結論は成立しない、なぜなら...に続く文で、 1. the claims made in support of this conclusion have not been shown to be correct 2. the claims made in support of this conclusion have not been shown to be relevant to it おそらくすごく微妙な言葉遣いで正解か不正解が決まっているのだと思うのですが, どちらでもあっているような気がします。。
- wanydccany
- お礼率99% (566/570)
- 英語
- 回答数1
- ありがとう数1
- みんなの回答 （1）
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
本文よりも 1. と 2. とで悩まされますね。一応考えてみましたが、自信があるわけでなし、優れた回答者の方々の便のために転記してみました （写真では文字が見えにくい方もおられると思うので）。 > Literature professor: Critics charge that the work of C. F. Providence's best-known follower, S. N. Sauk, lacks aesthetic merit because it employs Providence's own uniquely potent system of symbolic motifs in the service of a political ideal that Providence - and, significantly, some of these critics as well - would reject. Granting that Sauk is more imitator than innovator, and that he maintained political views very different from those Providence maintained, it has yet to be shown that these facts make his writings any less subtler or powerfully crafted than those of his more esteemed mentor. So the critics's argument should be rejected. 文学専攻教授： 批評家はC・F・プロビデンスの最もよく知られた追随者であるS・N・ソークの作品には、美的な価値が欠けているとケチをつける。なぜならそれ (ソークの作品) は、プロビデンスの作品に固有な、象徴的な主題を見事に扱う手法を、政治的な理想を表現する手段として利用しているからであり、そういうことはプロビデンスには受け入れがたいことであったろうし、さらに問題なのは、批判的な批評家たちの何人かにとっても受け入れがたいものであるだろうということだ。仮にソークは革新者というよりは模倣者であり、そして彼 (ソーク) の政治信条はプロビデンスの持っていたそれとはまるで異なったものであるとしても、そのような事実をもって彼 (ソーク) の著作の価値を、彼よりも名声の確立されている先輩 (プロビデンス) の作品と比べて、影が薄いとか強い構成力を備えているとか断じるわけにはいかない。だから批評家たちの主張は無視すべきだ。 > 1. the claims made in support of this conclusion have not been shown to be correct この結論を支持するための主張が正しいということはまだ正確に示されていない > 2. the claims made in support of this conclusion have not been shown to be relevant to it この結論を支持するための主張が、それ (結論) と関係があるということがまだ示されていない * 私だったら 1. の方を取るかもしれないなぁと思いました。
関連するQ&A
- 英語の得意な方、お助けを
(1)This substance was shown to be functional.を言い換えると、It was shown that this substance ( )functional.のカッコはisではなくwasですよね。 (2)This substance is shown to have been functional.になるには、It is shown that this substance ( )functional. のカッコにはなにをいれたらいいのでしょうか？ (3)この類の書き換えの法則性を教えてください。ここが過去形だとあそこも過去形だとか、あそこが過去形だとここは過去分詞になるとかありますよね。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 語順とか
１） My parents (had not long been married) before they came to live in this city. これは正しい英文なんですが、 （）内の選択肢で、 had not married long と言うのもありました。 私は、後者が正解だと思ったのですが、 had not long been marriedの語順は、 longがどうしてこの位置なのでしょうか？後者は何が間違いなのでしょうか？ ２） The dog was nowhere to be found to the great disapointment of the owner. 全体の意味は感じ取れますが、 to be found までは素直に意味が分かるんですが、 そのあと、to the great～～、と取って付けたような文構造は一体どうなっているのですか？ よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 返品とクレームに関するこの英文メールの意味はなんでしょうか？
この英文メールの意味について２点ほど教えてください。 雑誌を輸入するためアメリカの雑誌社にメールを書いたところ返事がきました。そこにRETURNS:という項目があり、次のように文章がはじまっています。 [１] RETURNS: All magazines are supplied with a 10% return allowance, provided that such returns are made within 9 months from our monthly statement dates. 「９ヶ月以内なら返品を１０％受け付ける」と解釈しました。この１０％とは「全雑誌の１０％を返品できる」なのか、もしくは「返品したらその料金が１０％返ってくる」なのでしょうか？ [２] 同じメールのつづきです。 Claims for returns or any other claims in transit may not be deducted from your payments. これは「運送などのクレームによって支払いを差し引くことはありません。」と解釈しました。この次の文章が分かりません。 Claims in transit are defined as those claims that have not yet been credited to your statement. In order for credits to be posted to your account promptly, please fax your return claims no later than the fifteenth of each month to Mr. XXX at (xxx) xxx-xxxx. これはどういう意味でしょうか？
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳お願い致します。
The question of the meaning of the word bara,'create,'has been previously touched upon;it has been acknowledged by good critics that it doesn't of itself necessarily imply 'to make out of nothing upon the simple ground that it is found [to be]uesd in cases where such a meaning would be inapplicable . But the difficultly of giving to it the interpretation contended for by Dr Buckland and of uniting with this the assumption of a six days' creation, such as that described in Genesis, at a comparatively recent period, lies in this,that the heaven itself is distinctly said to have been formed by the division of the waters on the second day. Consequently , until. The first Mosaic day of creation, there was no sky, no local habitation for the sun,moon and stars, even supposing those bodies to have been included in the original material. Dr Buckland doesn't touch this obvious difficulty, without which his argument that the sun and moon might have been contemplated as pre-existing , although they aren't stated to have been set in the heaven until the forth day, is of no value at all.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- この英文の和訳をお願いします。
The Safety of GM Foods Dou you think genetically modified food is safe enough to eat? A number of critics believe that GM foods have been not tested enough and that they must be re-tested to make sure they are not a risk to our health.Some studies suggest that GM foods may be harmful and dangerous to our health. Scientists have discovered in a laboratory experiment that rats fed with GM corn have toxins in their kidneys and liver. More importantly, the same kind of corn has already been approved for use as food for humans in the United States. Another discovery about GM foods suggests that people may have an allergic reaction to the genes which have been newly introduced.For example,scientists were thinking about introducing a gene from Brazil nuts into soybeans. Due to this GM technology,new allergens could be created, and people who have allergies can have a serious allergic reaction to the products made with the GM soybeans. A study indicates that more than 12 million Americans,about 4% of the population, have food allergies. They may have serious allergies,even anaphylactic shock if they eat foods with allergens. This severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) may cause difficulty breathing and shock, ultimately leading to death.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳お願い致します。
It is refreshing to return to the often-echoed remark, that it could not have been the object of a Divine revelation to instruct mankind in physical science, man having had faculties bestowed upon him to enable him to acquire this knowledge by himself. This is in fact pretty generally admitted; but in the application of the doctrine, writers play at fast and loose with it according to circumstances. Thus an inspired writer may be permitted to allude to the phenomena of nature according to the vulgar view of such things, without impeachment of his better knowledge; but if he speaks of the same phenomena assertively, we are bound to suppose that things are as he represents them, however much our knowledge of nature may be disposed to recalcitrate. But if we find a difficulty in admitting that such misrepresentations can find a place in revelation, the difficulty lies in our having previously assumed what a Divine revelation ought to be. If God made use of imperfectly informed men to lay the foundations of that higher knowledge for which the human race was destined, is it wonderful that they should have committed themselves to assertions not in accordance with facts, although they may have believed them to be true? On what grounds has the popular notion of Divine revelation been built up? Is it not plain that the plan of Providence for the education of man is a progressive one, and as imperfect men have been used as the agents for teaching mankind, is it not to be expected that their teachings should be partial and, to some extent, erroneous? Admitted, as it is, that physical science is not what the Hebrew writers, for the most part, profess to convey, at any rate, that it is not on account of the communication of such knowledge that we attach any value to their writings, why should we hesitate to recognise their fallibility on this head?
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文翻訳をお願いします。
"Mr. H", a British agent in Mexico, bribed an employee of the commercial telegraph company for a copy of the message. (Sir Thomas Hohler, then British ambassador in Mexico, claimed to have been "Mr. H", or at least involved with the interception, in his autobiography.) This ciphertext could be shown to the Americans without embarrassment. Moreover, the retransmission was enciphered using the older cipher 13040, so by mid-February the British had not only the complete text, but also the ability to release the telegram without revealing the extent to which the latest German codes had been broken—at worst, the Germans might have realized that the 13040 code had been compromised, but weighed against the possibility of United States entry into the war, that was a risk worth taking. Finally, since copies of the 13040 ciphertext would also have been deposited in the records of the American commercial telegraph, the British had the ability to prove the authenticity of the message to the United States government.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- WAIVERについて
WAIVERについての一説が難しくあまりよくわかりません。 以下の通りです。どなたか法律にお詳しい方、訳を教えていただけませんか？ WAIVER OF PRESENTMENT, ETC. The Guarantor hereby waives (a) notice of the creation, renewal, extension or accrual of the Obligations or proof of reliance by A Company on this Guaranty or acceptance of this Guaranty; (b) diligence, presentment, demand of payment, notice of default or non-payments, filing of claims with a court in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy of the Obligor, (c) any right to require a proceeding first against the Obligor; (d) defense, setoff or counterclaim (other than a defense of payment or performance) which may at any time be available to or be asserted by the Obligor; (e) any protest, notice and all demands whatsoever, which may constitute or be construed to constitute an equitable or legal discharge of the Obligor under the Obligations or the Guarantor hereunder. The Guarantor covenants that this Guaranty shall not be discharged except by complete performance of the Obligations. If A Company is required by any court or otherwise to return to the Obligor or the Guarantor or any trustee, liquidator or other similar official acting in relation to the Obligor or the Guarantor, any amount paid by either to A Company, this Guaranty, to the extent theretofore discharged, shall be reinstated in full force and effect. The Obligations, and any of them, shall conclusively be deemed to have been created, contracted or incurred, or renewed, extended, amender or waived, in reliance upon this Guaranty, and all dealings between or among the Guarantor, the Obligor, and A Company shall be conclusively presumed to have been made in reliance upon this Guaranty.
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 論文の和訳をお願いします！
まず、本文です！ １）With respect to mammalian systems, only two SNARE complexes have been described for ER-derived vesicles that fuse with the cis Golgi. ２）In one, Sec22b was the v-SNARE and syntaxin5, membrin and rBet1 were the t-SNAREs in NRK cells. ３）In the other, also using NRK cells, Ykt6 was the v-SNARE with syntaxin5, GOS28, and rBet1 as the t-SNAREs. ４）Both Ykt6 and Sec22b have been shown to have similar N-termini. ５）Because of their N-terminal extensions to the coiled-coil domains of the synaptobrevin-like SNARE motif of most v-SNAREs, these SNAREs have been called longins. ６）VAMP7, an additional member of the longin family (TI-VAMP, SYBL1), has not been described as an ER-related SNARE, but has been shown to be predominately associated with endosomes in mammals. ７）VAMP7 and Sec22b have both been shown to have a widespread tissue distribution whereas Ykt6 is predominantly found in brain in a lysosome-related compartment . 僕が今読んでいる論文はＶｅｓｓｉｃｌｅ－associated membrane protein7(VAMP7) is expressed in intestinal ERという論文の一部です １文目ですが、ＥＲは小胞体のことで、小胞体由来の小胞がシスゴルジ体に輸送されると書かれていると思います。 ２文目のＮＲＫは通常ラット腎臓のことだと思います。 特に５文目からわかりません・・synaptobrevin-like SNARE motifや、longinsなど・・。
- 締切済み
- 生物学
- 和訳をお願い致します。
宜しくお願い致します。 The above described Soybean variety is not genetically modified.The shipment described above has been identity preserved during harvest, storage, processing and transporting. I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, the said shipment, while in my possession, has not been mixed with genetically modified seed.This is not a purity guarantee and contamination may have occurred unbeknownst to me.Every attempt has been made to insure that no stones, metal or other harmful materials have contaminated this shipment.The above lot has been sold to:
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
お礼
タイプしていただきありがとうございます。すみません時間もそうですが手首ちょっと細すぎるせいか痛めていて... こたえをみたら2.でした。私も１を選んだのですが解説がないので何故かわからなく。。。