- ベストアンサー
彼らは肥沃な土地を耕し、多くの作物を育てました
sporesporeの回答
- sporespore
- ベストアンサー率30% (430/1408)
関連するQ&A
- 文法の質問が２問あります
こんにちは！ 文法の質問なんですが、よろしくお願いします。 １つ目 Many spend long periods trapped on land. この文章は「spend in ～ing」のin～ingが省略されてるのでしょうか？ Many spend long periods in being trapped on land. ということでしょうか？ ２つ目 There is something threatening to be sitting there, trapped by the light. ここのto beの不定詞は何用法なんでしょうか？ よろしくお願いいたします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳お願いします。
At this point, the biofuels industry starts shouting "jatropha". It is not yet a swear word, but it soon will be. Jatropha is a tough weed with oily seeds that grows in the tropics. This summer Bob Geldof, who never misses an opportunity to promote simplistic solutions to complex problems, arrived in Swaziland in the role of "special adviser" to a biofuels firm. Because it can grow on marginal land, jatropha, he claimed, is a "life-changing" plant that will offer jobs, cash crops and economic power to African smallholders. Yes, it can grow on poor land and be cultivated by smallholders. But it can also grow on fertile land and be cultivated by largeholders. If there is one blindingly obvious fact about biofuel, it's that it is not a smallholder crop. It is an internationally traded commodity that travels well and can be stored indefinitely, with no premium for local or organic produce. Already the Indian government is planning 14m hectares of jatropha plantations. In August, the first riots took place among the peasant farmers being driven off the land to make way for them. If the governments promoting biofuels do not reverse their policies, the humanitarian impact will be greater than that of the Iraq war. Millions will be displaced, hundreds of millions more could go hungry. This crime against humanity is a complex one, but that neither lessens nor excuses it. If people starve because of biofuels, Ruth Kelly and her peers will have killed them. Like all such crimes, it is perpetrated by cowards, attacking the weak to avoid confronting the strong. よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文和訳の解説をお願いします
読解の問題集を解いております。問題集の解答だけでは理解できないところがあるので、解説をお願いします・・・ 以下が、英文と、解答としてあげられていた訳文です。 It is only human not to be able to do mathematics. ↓ 数学ができないのは人間には当然のことに過ぎない。（数学ができるのは天才か狂人だけだ） 私は「数学ができないのは人間だけだ」、という風に読んでしまうのですが・・・
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英訳の添削お願いします。
またお世話になります。 ○近頃では何でも子供の言いなりになってしまう親が多くなったのだが、そういった親は、それでは子供がだめになるだけだという事に全然気づいていない。 ○Nowadays there are many parents who are made to do as thier children want,and they don’t realize their children will become lazy by that. 何とか訳しましたが、模範解答お願いします！出来るだけ簡易な表現でお願いします！
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳
次の文の和訳をよろしくお願いしますm(__)m The amount of land we can use to produce food is also limited. Today, roughly 11％ of the land on Earth can be used for crops, while another 20％ is available for raising animals. Each year, however, more of this land is lost as cities grow and roads stretch across the land. In addition, overcultivation has already damaged an amount of farmland equal to the size of the United States and Canada combined. It is posrible to increase the amount of farmland, but only a little. Some farmland can be more productive if people start using different farmingmethods, but this will not increase worldwide production very much.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 動名詞の意味上の主語
こんにちは。 文法の解釈で理解できずにいるので、宜しければご教授願います。 besides being the land where all human beings originated, there have been many great civilizations there in the past. besides being a businessman, you are an actor. という様な文章なら、動名詞の意味上の主語と主節の主語が一致しているのが明確に理解できるのですが there is 構文を用いた例文だと、主語をどのように解釈すればよいのか分かりません。 私の疑問は、以下の点です。 (1)there is 構文の主語はどこにあると解釈すべきなのか？ (2)前置詞の後に来る動名詞の意味上の主語は、主節の主語と必ず一致しなければならないのか？ (3)一致すべきならば、この例文における、beingの意味上の主語はどこにあると解釈すべきなのか？ 一致しなくても良ければ、他の例文を教えて頂けると幸いです。 すごく細かいことに固執しているのかもしれませんが、是非宜しくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- onlyの意味が…？
It is only human not to be able to do mathematics. という文があります。 文頭のitは仮主語なのでto以下を受けていて、さらにnotはtoの内容を否定している、というところまではわかります。 ただ辞書を引いてもonlyのはたらきがいまいち分かりません。 全体の意味は、 「数学ができないのは人間には当然のことにすぎない。」 だそうです。 何となく「すぎない」のところにonlyの感じが出ているようですが、「当然」という部分など、謎が深まるばかりです。 解説の方を宜しくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳と文法説明お願いします。
入試問題の和訳でわからないところがあります。 自分で訳しましたので、添削お願いします。 （ ）したところが、わからないところです。 Was mathematics an invention by people,or (was it all out there in the world,waiting to be discovered? Some bits of mathematics are so familiar that they seem to be part of nature. Take the equal sign,for example;it seems so natural that you could fond one in the one in the garden,but it was invented by a mathematician,Robert Recorde,in the 16th century. 数学は人々によって発明されたものだろうか、それとも（発見されるのを待ちながらーーーーーーーーーー？） 数学のある断片はとても身近にあるので、自然の一部であるように思われる。 例えば，等記号を取って見よう、それはとても自然なので、あなたは庭に見つけることができるだろうが、それは１６世紀の数学者のロバート レコルデによって発明された。 （ ）内のout there がよくわかりません。それと ３文目のone は等記号をさしていますか。 教えてください。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳お願いします。
The British government says it will strive to ensure that "only the most sustainable biofuels" will be used in the UK. It has no means of enforcing this aim - it admits that if it tried to impose a binding standard it would break world trade rules. But even if "sustainability" could be enforced, what exactly does it mean? You could, for example, ban palm oil from new plantations. This is the most destructive kind of biofuel, driving deforestation in Malaysia and Indonesia. But the ban would change nothing. As Carl Bek-Nielsen, vice chairman of Malaysia's United Plantations Berhad, remarked: "Even if it is another oil that goes into biodiesel, that other oil then needs to be replaced. Either way, there's going to be a vacuum and palm oil can fill that vacuum." The knock-on effects cause the destruction you are trying to avoid. The only sustainable biofuel is recycled waste oil, but the available volumes are tiny. At this point, the biofuels industry starts shouting "jatropha". It is not yet a swear word, but it soon will be. Jatropha is a tough weed with oily seeds that grows in the tropics. This summer Bob Geldof, who never misses an opportunity to promote simplistic solutions to complex problems, arrived in Swaziland in the role of "special adviser" to a biofuels firm. Because it can grow on marginal land, jatropha, he claimed, is a "life-changing" plant that will offer jobs, cash crops and economic power to African smallholders. Yes, it can grow on poor land and be cultivated by smallholders. But it can also grow on fertile land and be cultivated by largeholders. If there is one blindingly obvious fact about biofuel, it's that it is not a smallholder crop. It is an internationally traded commodity that travels well and can be stored indefinitely, with no premium for local or organic produce. Already the Indian government is planning 14m hectares of jatropha plantations. In August, the first riots took place among the peasant farmers being driven off the land to make way for them. If the governments promoting biofuels do not reverse their policies, the humanitarian impact will be greater than that of the Iraq war. Millions will be displaced, hundreds of millions more could go hungry. This crime against humanity is a complex one, but that neither lessens nor excuses it. If people starve because of biofuels, Ruth Kelly and her peers will have killed them. Like all such crimes, it is perpetrated by cowards, attacking the weak to avoid confronting the strong.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英語の長文、和訳お願いします、II
The amount of land we can use to produce food is also limited. Today, roughty 11% of the land on Earth can be used for crops, while another 20% is available for raising animals. Each year, however, more of this land is lost as cities grow and roads stretch across the land. In addition overcultivation has already damaged an amount of farmland equal to the size of the United States and Canada combined. It is possible to increase the amount of farmkand, but only a little. Some farmland can be more productive if people start using different farming methods, but this will not increase worldwide production very much. While we have many different sources of commercial energy, there is a limited supply of many of them. Today, most of the world's commercial energy comes from three nonrenewable energy resources―petroleum, natural gas, and coal. Three quaters of this commercial energy is used by developed countries. As the standard of living goes up in other contries, so will the demand for energy. Some scientsts predict that if everyone in the world lived like an American, our fossil fuel supply would last for just fifteen more years. Clearly, the number of people that the Earth can support in the future will depend on many things. The Earth may be able to support 9 billion people, but what will their standard of living be? And what effect will all these people have on the environment?
- ベストアンサー
- 英語