アメリカの企業が穏やかな政治環境を受け入れることが容易になった理由とは?

このQ&Aのポイント
  • アメリカの企業が穏やかな政治環境を受け入れることが容易になった理由は、国のグローバルな経済力によるものです。
  • しかしこの経済力は第二次世界大戦の後、世界の他の国々が回復をはじめる中で次第に衰え始めました。
  • その結果、アメリカ人は縮小する経済の利益を巡ってますます闘う必要が生じました。
回答を見る
  • ベストアンサー

英文の邦訳

The willingness of American corporations to accept the moderate political environment was certainly made easier by the nation's global economic power. When that power began to recede, as it almost inevitably did as the rest of the world began to recover from World War II, it became increasingly necessary for Americans to fight over the spoils of a shrinking pie. 上記英文中,後半のas it almost inevitably did as the rest of the world began to recover from World War II, it became increasingly necessary for Americans to fight over the spoils of a shrinking pie.の部分が上手く訳せません。お分かりになる方,適訳をどうぞ宜しくお願いします。

  • jubu
  • お礼率86% (901/1042)
  • 英語
  • 回答数1
  • ありがとう数2

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • Nakay702
  • ベストアンサー率80% (9705/12071)
回答No.1

以下のとおりお答えします。 >上記英文中,後半のas it almost inevitably did as the rest of the world began to recover from World War II, it became increasingly necessary for Americans to fight over the spoils of a shrinking pie.の部分が上手く訳せません。適訳をどうぞ宜しくお願いします。 ⇒「世界の他国が第二次世界大戦から回復し始めたときに、(それに呼応して)米国企業の後退はほぼ不可避のことになったので、アメリカ人にとっては縮小したパイの争奪戦を戦うことがますます必要になった。」

jubu
質問者

お礼

有難う御座いました。

関連するQ&A

  • 英文の邦訳

    Sarah Dadush presents a study of the development and use of indicators and related reporting systems in social impact investing, through the Global Impact Investment Rating System (GIIRS) and the Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS). Social issues are coming to be weighed in commercial investments, while market values are increasingly inserted into philanthropy. In this dual process, quantification and the emulation of commercial ratings and ccounting make specialized “investment impact” indicators increasingly significant as bridging and blurring devices. 上記英文の最後のセンテンスIn this dual process, quantification and the emulation of commercial ratings and ccounting make specialized “investment impact” indicators increasingly significant as bridging and blurring devices.をお訳し下さい。

  • 英文の邦訳

    A circular sent out in the year IX (1800-01) from the office ofJ. A. C. de Chaptal invited the local authorities to introduce new categories into the tables where necessary, but this, as Marie-Noelle Bourguet observes, was "to recognize the existence of a diverse, local reality, irreducible to the categories of a national accounting." 上記英文を御訳し願います。

  • 英文の邦訳をお願いします。

    As one executive told Useem (1984:47–48): You’re damn right it’s helpful to be on several boards. It extends the range of your network and acquaintances, and your experience. That’s why you go on a board, to get something as well as give… It just broadens your experience, the memory bank that you have to test things against. 上記英文の邦訳をお願い致します。

  • 英文の邦訳

    The contemporary internationalization of state capitalism is a particularly striking development in this respect. For the time being, this appears to have a stabilizing influence on the world economy, since it helps to cement tacit or explicit forms of state-state and state-firm cooperation, which tame the vicissitudes of market fluctuations. 上記英文中,For the time being, this appears to have a stabilizing influence on the world economy, since it helps to cement tacit or explicit forms of state-state and state-firm cooperation, の邦訳は次の通りで宜しいでしょうか?添削をお願いします。 「当面の間,これは世界経済を安定化する影響作用を示すように見える,というのは,それが,国民国家と国家企業の協調に対し暗黙裏の了解,あるいは,その明示的な形態を堅く示す上で役立つからである,」 以上宜しくお願いします。

  • 英文の邦訳

    Over the past twenty years, a widening gulf has appeared between the increasingly internationalized financing arrangements of the world’s leading corporations and the persistence of nationally compartmentalized approaches to the study of corporate control. In lieu of direct empirical evidence on corporate control at the global level, the most widespread assumption is that the globalization of ownership has taken the form of an expansion of arm’s-length, market- based arrangements traditionally prevailing in the Anglo-American economies. 上記英文中後半の,In lieu of 以下の適訳をお願い致します。

  • 英文の邦訳をお願いします。

    Manne’s article preceded the 1960s merger wave, and that wave dominated by managers seeking to diversify their firms into what were often unrelated industries, was, if anything, a Jensen and Meckling nightmare, a management power play to increase the CEOs' reach over broad swaths of the business world.  It was not until the 1980s that the movement that paid homage to Jensen and Meckling―even if inadvertently―developed, as agency logic replaced managerial logic as a rationale for firm actions. 以上の適訳をお願い致します。

  • 英文の邦訳の添削を願います。

    The question is how limited beings like ourselves can alter their conception of the world so that it is no longer just the view from where they are but in a sense a view from nowhere, which includes and comprehends the fact that the world contains beings which possess it, explains why the world appears to them as it does prior to the formation of that conception, and explains how they can arrive at the conception itself. This idea of objective knowledge has something in common with the program of Descartes, for he attempted to form a conception of the world in which he was contained, which would account for the validity of that conception and for his capacity to arrive at it. But his method was supposed to depend only on propositions and steps that were absolutely certain, and the method of self-transcendence as I have described it does not necessarily have this feature. In fact, such a conception of the world need not be developed by proofs at all, though it must rely heavily on a priori conjecture. 上記英文の下記の拙訳の添削をお願いします。 「問題は,われわれのような制約された存在が,自身の世界を,最早まさに自分のいる所から眺めた世界ではなく,ある意味で,何処にも偏らない〔西洋の神の〕視点から見た〔かのような〕世界に関する概念に如何に変えることができるかである。その問題では,世界がそれを所有する制約された存在を含むという事実が内包され,了解される。それは,世界が,構想の形成に先立って何処にも偏らない〔西洋の神の〕視点から見たかのように見える理由を,さらに,われわれがその構想そのものに如何に到達することができるのかを説明する。この客観的な知識の考え方はDescartesの基本方針と共通点がある。それは,Descartes自身が含まれる世界に関する構想を企図しようとし,それが,その構想の妥当性とそれに到達する彼の知的能力とを推し量るからである。だが,彼の方法は絶対に確実な主張と道筋にのみ依存するはずであり,私が表したような自己超越的方法は必ずしもこのような特徴を持っていない。実際このような世界観は先験的な推測に大きく依存するけれども,証明によって展開される必要はまったくない。」

  • 英文の邦訳の添削

    There is some reason to believe that this architecture is fundamentally unstable and may be forced to undergo unpredictable transformations almost as quickly as it emerges. Two tensions stand out as particularly prominent. First, although the exhaustion of the drive to liquidity and efficiency can be primarily understood as a bottom-up Veblenian phenomenon, the centralized network arrangements resulting from it are increasingly at odds with the Polanyian market disciplinary political impulse. 上記英文の次の試訳の添削を願います。 「こうした構造が,根本的に不安定で,しかも,現れるや否や即,予測不可能な転形を強いられる場合があると信じるだけの理由がある。2つの緊張関係が特に顕著に目立つ。第一に,流動性と効率性の制御機能の消耗が,詳細なものから徐々に概略的なものに移っていくVeblen的な現象として基本的に理解できるにもかかわらず,その現象の帰結である中央集中化するネットワークの配置が,益々Polanyi的な市場の規律上の政策的推進力とかみ合わなくなる。」以上,宜しくお願いします。

  • 英文の邦訳

    The fact that such promissory notes today cannot be cashed in for gold does not take away from their relationship to the sublime and the uncanny. It is important, however, not to lose sight of the fact that the ghostly glow shimmers only on rotting meat, that the other side of the sublime is slime—the messiness of desublimation necessary to create the seemingly pure forms of monetary equivalence and the seemingly pure distinctions between gift and commodity, sacred and profane, that animate whole monetary, mathematical, and market worlds. 上記英文を御訳し願います。

  • 英文の邦訳を願います。

    Yet Section 13(d) and its applicable rules do not only support an interpretation of mandate ownership. They place the ability to exercise de facto power above any formal legal title to the share, and make it in fact superior to any other type of ownership. The SEC has formally recognized the supremacy of the ability to exercise de facto power over any formal title to the share as a constituent element of beneficial ownership, by explicitly indicating that “the mere possession of a legal right to vote is not determinative of who is the beneficial owner inasmuch as another person has the power, whether legal, economic or otherwise to direct such voting.” 上記英文の,特に The SEC以降の邦訳をお願い致します。