- ベストアンサー
文法と和訳を教えて下さい
- みんなの回答 （1）
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
まず始めに、重力を変化させたシクリッドの行動と関連事項を 可能な限り徹底的に把握したかったので、我々はゼブラフィッシュを使った比較分析は行なわなかった。 Comparative analysis in which zebrafish were used までが主語です（whichはanalysisを指しています）。Comparative analysis in zebrafish だけだと「ゼブラフィッシュ内の比較分析」になってしまいますし、Comparative analysis in zebrafish were used とwhichを省略するのは英文法では認められていないと思います。 （cichilidはcichlidのタイプミスと考えました。）
関連するQ&A
- 英文を和訳してみたので見て欲しい
Like the rest of us, the last thing in the world he wanted was to disrupt this new kindergarten world we were all just getting used to. 和訳の問題です。 「私たちの残りと似たように、彼が欲した、世界で最後のことは、私たち全員が慣れ始めたばかりのこの新しい幼稚園という世界を混乱させることだった」 と訳したんですが、どうでしょうか。 詳しく見てもらいたいです。 おねがいします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳
In the old days,these parties were associated with agricultural events such as in celebrating the end of the harvest. Now the gathering not only occur among farmers (but) amog office workers as well. 《訳》 昔、これらのパーティーは収穫の終わりを祝う、農家の行事として関連付けられていた。 現在、この集まりは農家の間だけでなく 職場の間にもよくある。 (1)この様な訳になったのですが、上手な訳し方を教えて下さい。 (2)本文中に注意する点などがあれば教えて下さい。 (3)( )はbutで合っていますか？ 以上、宜しくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳教えてください
意味の違いがよくわかるように和訳教えてください 1 Didn't he ask you what you wanted? Didn't you find what you wanted? 2 Whoever many come,don't let him in. Whoever comes to my office will be served a cup of tea. 3 There were only a few guests who escaped from the fire. There were only a few guests, who escaped from the fire. 4 You can take home as much food as you like. You will have as good a change as you'll ever have. よろしくお願いします
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 訳出願い 長文
Comparative Historical Analysis, James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyerからの引用です。 下記の部分の和訳が上手くいきません。皆様の知恵をお貸しください。 よろしくお願いいたします。 Comparative historical analysis has a long and distinguished history in the social sciences. Those whom we now regard as the founders of modern social science,from Adam Smith to Alexis de Tocqueville to Karl Marx, all pursued comparative historical analysis as a central mode of investigation. In doing so, they continued a tradition of research that had dominated social thought for centuries. Even when social science began to organize itself into separate disciplines in the early twentieth century, comparative and historical investigation maintained a leading position, figuring prominently in the research of such eminent scholars as Otto Hintze, Max Weber, and Marc Bloch. Only by the mid-twentieth century did other approaches to social knowledge partially eclipse comparative historical research, going so far as to threaten its permanent decline. After some period of neglect, however, recent decades have witnessed a dramatic reemergence of the comparative historical tradition. Although important problems of analytic procedure and methodology remain,this mode of investigation has reasserted itself at the center of today’s social sciences. These recent advances derived from earlier developments. By the late 1970s and early 1980s,it was already clear that comparative historical research was experiencing a revival across the social sciences. In her concluding chapter in Vision and Method in Historical Sociology,for example, Theda Skocpol (1984a) pointed out that this kind of research was well beyond its days as an isolated mode of analysis carried out by a few older scholars dedicated to the classical tradition. Now, almost two decades later, few observers would deny that comparative historical research is again a leading mode of analysis, widely used throughout the social sciences. This volume seeks to assess the achievements of comparative historical research over the last thirty years, discuss persistent problems, and explore agendas for the future. we begin that task by delineating the distinctive features of this mode of analysis. We suggest that comparative historical analysis is best considered part of a long-standing intellectual project oriented toward the explanation of substantively important outcomes. It is defined by a concern with causal analysis, an emphasis on processes over time, and the use of systematic and contextualized comparison. In offering this definition, we intentionally exclude other analytical and methodological traits that are often associated with comparative historical analysis but that we do not consider part of its core features. For example, although many comparative historical analyses offer explanations based on social and political structures and their change, the research tradition is not inherently committed to structural explanation or any other single theoretical orientation. Likewise, while most work in the field employs qualitative forms of data analysis, comparative historical analysis is not characterized by any single method of descriptive and causal inference.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文法を教えてください。
回数を表す表現、平均値を表す表現を教えてください。下の文章は正しいでしょうか。特に単数と複数の使い分けに自信がありません。よろしくお願いします。 Mean values of the intensities of exploration behavior in one session (30 times of trials) were showed as strength x time. １セッション３０回の試技における探索行動の強さの平均を強さ×時間で示した。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳お願いしますm(_ _)m
Bean-Scattering Ceremony Originally the term setsubun referred to any of the divi-sions of the solar year, but over time it came to be associated specifically with the eve of the first day of spring. According to the old lunar calendar, the first day of spring and the new year were celebrated at about the same time. Traditional ceremonies for purification and for driving away demons were held to prepare for the new year as well as for the spring planting season. In order to drive away evil forces, people threw roasted beans at the invisible demons outside their homes and then scattered beans inside to attract good luck. This ceremony is still carried out by most families, although it is not considered as seriously as it was in the past. often one child in the family wears a devil mask, and the other children playfully throw beans at him or her as a game, not as an exorcism ceremony. 長文失礼しましたm(_ _)m
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 和訳お願い致します.
Mental Evolution in Animals(1883). In the family of the sciences Comparative Psychology may claim nearest kinship with Comparative Anatomy; for just as the latter aims at a scientific comparison of the bodily structures of organisms, so the former aims at a similar com parison of their mental structures. Moreover, in the one science as in the other, the first object is to analyze all the complex structures with which each has respectively to deal. When this analysis, or dissection, has been completed for as great a number of cases as circumstances permit, the next object is to compare with one another all the structures which have been thus analyzed; and, lastly, the results of such comparison supply, in each case alike, the basis for the final object of these sciences, which is that of classifying, with reference to these results, all the structures which have been thus examined.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
お礼
回答ありがとうございます。 勉強になりました！ 参考にさせていただきます＞＜