ベストアンサー

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

2011/07/03 00:01

another important property of waves is their speed, which depends on the type of wave and the nature of the medium through which the wave is traveling (for example, air, water, or a vacuum). この英文を和訳してほしいです。

momok_222222
お礼率91% (65/71)

英語
回答数1
ありがとう数1

みんなの回答 （1）
専門家の回答

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

ベストアンサー

inopy7426
ベストアンサー率57% (143/247)

2011/07/03 00:41 回答No.1

もう一つの重要な波の特性は波の速さで、それは波の型と波が伝わる媒体、例えば空気、水、真空などの性質によって決まる

質問者

お礼 2011/07/03 14:25

ありがとうございます。(*^_^*)

関連するQ&A

英文の長文、和訳お願いします

Does the Earth have the natural resources to support this many people? Unfortunately, the answer to this question depends on information we don't have. For example, we don't know how people will choose to live in the future. We don't know what their standard of living will be. We also don't know what new technologies will be available in the future. We do know that the Earth's natural resources are limited. Fresh water, for example, is crucial for health and food production. However, more than 97% of the water on Earth is salt water, which is poisonous to both people and crops. Only 3% of the water on Earth is fresh water, and three quarters of that fresh water is frozen at the North and South Poles. Today, the demands for fresh water is greater than the supply in roughly eighty countries around the world. By 2025, scientists predict that forty-eight countries will have chronic shortages of water. At present, disalinization, or the removal of salt from salt water, is not a solution to the shortage of fresh water. It takes a lot of energy to remove the salt from ocean water, and that makes the disalinization process very expensive.
次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

A wave can be thought of as a vibrating disturbance by which energy is transmitted. この英文を和訳してほしいです。
次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

Methylation is a chemical process in which a methyl(CH3)group is added to an atom or molecule. The resulting compound does not usually dissolve in water and is more easily absorbed into organisms such as plankton. Methylmercury is very dangerous because it enters the food chain as soon as it is absorbed into plankton. Next, it ends up in a fish that eats the contaminated plankton. After the contaminated fish is eaten by another fish, the methylmercury stays in the surviving fish's flesh, and the cycle may be repeated over and over. Once the mercury reaches the top of the food chain, for example in a 300-kilogram tuna, it will stay there for the rest of the fish's life. As a result, people are very worried about the effect of eating fish that are high on the food chain or very old. These fish may have very high accumulations of mercury, and thus may be dangerous to eat. Fish that are lower on the food chain, or younger, are seen as safer. As the article makes clear, an important first step is to discover the exact nature of the ocean's mercury methylation process. After the process is understood, it may be possible to control it. Until we can reduce the amount of mercury that accumulates in the ocean, it would be advisable to avoid fish that may be high on mercury, wouldn't it?
この英文はどのように訳せば良いのでしょう？

この英文はどのように訳せば良いのでしょうか？特に”nature of ～”の解釈がよく解らないのですが。 What is the nature of their claim? and, What is the total amount of their claim? if they mentioned it to you. 初歩的な質問かもしれませんが、どなたかご教授下さい。
英文の和訳をお願いします。

以下の英文の和訳をお願いします。 Displacement is one means by which the dream does this. In the first place, it is the effect of feeling which is displaced, so that what appears to be most important and full of emotion in the dream may be really of least significance, whereas an apparently trifling matter may be pregnant with meaning. The emphasis of the dream is thus displaced and so eludes the censor.
次の英文の訳についておしえてください

The problem is that this approach to EBM is nothing but the biological dogma dressed up in new clothes another example of how the eclecticism of the BPS modelcan be used to cloak underlying dogmatism よくわからないのは、dressed up　で、これは他動詞で目的語がanother exampleなのでしょうか？とすると、nothing but　のあとには、 thatが省略されて、節を構成していることになりますか？どうもdressed upは過去分詞で、直前のdogmaをうしろから限定していて、another example　の前には、コンマが抜け落ちていて、これを補うと、「問題は、こうしたＥＢＭへのアプローチが、生物学的教義が装いを新たにしたものに過ぎないということである。：ＢＰＳモデルの折衷主義が根底にある教条主義を覆い隠すために用いられることが可能であるという、一つの実例である。」という訳になるのかな？とも思うのですが、いかがでしょうか？
和訳をお願いします

和訳をお願いします Have you ever wondered why the Earth looks so blue from space? This is because about three quarters of the Earth's surface is covererd by water. This may sound like we have a lot of water to drink. But in reality, only 3 percent of the Earth's water is fresh, and most of it exists as ice. Half of the water which exists as fresh water is found deep under the ground. In all, only about 0.05 percent of the Earth's water is fresh and drinkable. All living things carry water inside their bodies.For example,more than 60 percent of the human body is water.We need about 40 liters of water inside our bodies all the time but we lose some water every day. The water our bodies lose each day is about 2.5 liters. So we constantly need to put back the water we lose. We get water from drinks and the food we eat, such as fruit and vegetables. We need fresh water for our survival, but it is scarce and sometimes difficult to get.
和訳してください。

Or perhaps we should say rather that the dichotomy between primitive and revealed religions is false, for there is a sense in which all religious are religions of revelation; the world around them and their reason have everywhere revealed to people something of the　divine, of their own nature and destiny.
Which is more importantの後に「monument」が省略

Another problem was that the rising water would cover some of Egypt's greatest monuments. The most important of these were the temple of Abu Simbel. Which is more important, people or monuments? もう一つの問題は、上昇した水がエジプトの最も偉大な建造物を水没させるであろうことです。その最も重要なものはアブシンベルです。人々か建造物、どちらがより重要なのでしょうか？と訳しましたが、 Which is more importantの後に「monument」が省略されていると考えていいのでしょうか？お手数ですが、よろしくお願いします。
次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

Systems theory is a fascinating new discipline. By looking at each part of a system and determining the effect it has on other parts, a map of the process can be made. This analysis helps make it clear how changes in one part of the system affect other parts and the system as a whole. A common example now is the melting of ice in the Arctic. If the summer temperature stays under a particular point, the amount of melted ice stays small. However, if the average temperature of the air in the summer is too high, the system might enter a state where all the ice melts. This happens because of a feedback loop: since ice reflects a lot of sunlight away from the Arctic, if there is less ice than usual, then more water will absorb sunlight and warm up. With more warm water present, more ice melts, and more water gets warmed up; this cycle continues, and accelerates. Soon, there is no more ice left. As for the mercury cycle, the ocean methylation process is not completely understood, so we are not yet able to figure out how to prevent mercury from methylating and entering the food chain. Once the process is understood, we hope to be able to control the amount of methylation so as to protect our marine food supply.
次の英文を和訳してください。

Scientific investigation is not only used to advance science - sometimes scientific procedures are used to investigate a crime or to provide evidence in a criminal trial. This application of scientific methods for legal use is the fast-growing area known as "forensics." For example, when DNA, blood, a fingerprint, hair, or other tissue is found at a crime scene, investigators can often match the sample to the person from whom it came. Now we have learned that DNA samples that are found at the crime scene may be able to give us information about a person's eye color. As exciting as this development is, we should keep in mind that matching DNA from a sample to a suspect is still not very accurate. In fact, the most important use of DNA samples may be to eliminate people from suspicion. It is not possible to state with nearly 100% certainty that a particular DNA sample is from a particular person. However, it is possible to state with certainly that a particular sample did not come from a particular person. In recent years many people who were wrongly convicted of crimes have been cleared because their DNA was completely different from DNA found at the scene. Forensic medicine is very important, but it must be used very carefully. Nobody should be convicted of a crime based solely on DNA evidence.
何故、この和訳になるのか

In another sense man is,of course,himself a part of Nature. But he is also in so many ways so unique that it is convenient to speak of man's relation to the rest of this Nature of which he is also a part. But以下の和訳で「しかし、人間はまた非常に多くの点できわめて独特なので、人間と自然、特に人間もまたその一部であるこの自然の人間以外の部分と人間との関係というふうに言うのは都合が良いことなのである。」この「人間以外の部分と人間との関係」というところで the restが「人間以外の部分」と訳出されるみたいなのですが何故the restがそのような訳になるのか理解出来ません。教えて下さい。
和訳に困ってます＞＜宜しくお願いします＞＜

和訳に困ってます＞＜宜しくお願いします＞＜英語の和訳をお願いします！長文になりますが、宜しくお願いします！ The mind is no less capable in women than in men of making this from resolve which constitutes virtue and of recognising the circumstances in which it should be practised. women can control their passions just as well as we can, and they are not more inclined to vice than to virtue. One could even tilt the balance in their favour on this issue because affecthion for children. which is incompara bly stronger in women than in men, is naturally linked with compassion which, in trun, could be called the virtue and tha bond of civil society. it is impossible to imagine that society is reasonably established for any other purpose apart from the mutual satisfaction of needs and common necessities. And if one looked closely at how passions arise in us, one would find that the way in which women treat us when we are in distress, almost like their own children, is like a natural development of their contribution to the birth and education of men. Thet the differences which can be observed in the conduct of men and women derive from their education It is all the more important to notice that the dispositions with which we are born are neither good nor evil, because otherwise one cannot avoid a rather common mistake of attributing to nature something which results only from custom
次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

From the time that life first appeared on Earth, species have gone extinct. Extinction is a natural part of evolution. Species that are best at adapting to their environment survive. Other species are unable to adapt quickly enough – so they die off. So, why do endangered species get so much attention today? One reason is much of the extinction happening these days is unnatural. The leading reason for a species to become endangered is loss of habitat. As humans cut down forests for farmland, expand cities, or pollute waterways, to name a few ways that habitat is destroyed, animals, plants, and insects find it harder and harder to survive. Thus, the effect of humans on the natural world is causing species to become endangered, and, ultimately, go extinct. Another leading reason for a species to become endangered is climate change. For example, the lizards in this article could probably adapt to a gradual change in temperature. However, the rapid change in the climate, and the consequent decrease in lizard birthrate, threaten to doom many lizard species. If human activity is a major reason for climate change, then it would seem that we are changing our world far too rapidly for species to naturally adapt. Humans are highly adaptable, but most species need a lot of time to get used to changing conditions.
次の英文を和訳してください。

In this study, the researchers used "a powerful mathematical algorithm" to find the SNPs that would be most useful for them. It is increasingly common for biologists and other scientists to use algorithms, or step-by-step procedures, in analyzing date. An algorithm is often shown as a flowchart with decision points. At each decision point, the process will go in one direction or another. For example, after you read an email message you may make a simple decision: "Should I reply to this message?" If the answer is "Yes, reply" then the next decision point is "Should I reply immediately?" On the other hand, if the answer is "No, do not reply" then the next decision point is "Should I archive this message or throw it away?" That is, each alternative leads to its own path. At the end of the process, you will have either 1) read, replied to, and archived the message, 2) read, replied to, and deleted the message, 3) read and archived the message, or 4) read and deleted the message. Obviously, if such a simple decision can be charted out with so many alternatives and consequent final decisions, the complicated environment in which scientists work will require highly sophisticated algorithms. Without the use of computer-driven algorithms, there would not be enough time to explore all of the potential decision paths. Thus, new disciplines such as computational biology have arisen in order to support researchers in their quest for knowledge.
次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

The article mentions that it took 17 years from the beginning of the investigation to the publication of the 11 papers on Ardi in 2009. During that time only one paper was published by the team members, in 1994. It is interesting that the team did not publish papers on the research for 15 years, for we live in the era of “publish or perish” – in other words, professors understand that they need to publish academic articles in order to keep their jobs, or at least to be able to advance their careers. True, 47 of the 70 investigators on the team were listed as authors on the 11 papers. Also, the publication of the papers all at once essentially guaranteed that the papers were given a lot of attention. Still, it is encouraging that the universities and other institutions that funded the research continued to support the team members despite the lack of papers. After all, “publish or perish” is largely due to the need for universities to be recognized as places where a lot of research is being done. High levels of publication lead to high evaluations, which helps attract students and funding to a particular university. The presence of good students and large research budgets help the school maintain its excellence. So the term “publish or perish” may not be quite as cynical as it first sounds.
この英文の和訳をお願いできないでしょうか？

次の文章の和訳をお願いできないでしょうか？経済について書かれた文章なのですが、翻訳機能を利用して和訳をしてみてもいまいち意味が理解できません。どなたか和訳をお願いします。 Another problem concerning both the competitiveness of Greek capitalism as well as other aspects of the programme is the relatively weak disinflation of the Greek economy . The strategy of export-oriented economy requires the competitive disinflation of the Greek economy . That is the general decline of prices so that the Greek products can become more competitive abroad . However , while wages have been brutally 'deflated' selling prices either are not dropping or are falling very slowly . It is characteristic that only in the third quarter of 2013 appeared a weak reduction in the general price level . This is another failure of the EAPs . The main reason for this inadequate disinflation is that Greek capital (particularly in sectors related to the mass consumption of the population ) organises monopolistic and oligopolistic situations in order to keep its profitability or even to increase it by exploiting the reduction of wages which it does not pass on to prices . Some other factors , on which the designers of the Memoranda strategy also place some hopes , can be described as ' windfall gains ' . The most important of these factors is tourism , finding and exploiting natural resources and foreign investment . Foreign investment is also associated to the export-led growth strategy . To the extent that they will arise such 'windfall gains ' , it is hoped that they will help to alleviate the pressure of debt and facilitate the structural transformation of the economy . Nevertheless these factors are extremely unstable and dubious . Tourism depends crucially on the international political and economic environment . A global recession ( or a recession in basic tourist countries ) and events like a military adventure in the Mediterranean can very easily exert a negative effect on tourism . Accordingly , even if confirmed the projected natural resources reserves will require some time before production is commenced . Finally , as regards foreign investment the experience of the privatisation programme is very enlightening .
和訳お願いします

In language classes, a common topic is conservation. In one recent debate, students discussed an important question: should people give water to wild animals during a drought? Another project might consist of finding out how an animal died.
英文和訳があります。和訳は正しいですか？

Americans who are in important positions would not make a big fuss about where they sit in a car for another reason. Americans strongly believe in equality as an ideal. Someone who is of high statues is expected to minimize his own importance. The people around him are also expected not to make too much of a fuss over him. An important person who is nice to the "little guy" is respected. 和訳重要な地位にあるアメリカ人は、もうひとつの理由から車のどこに座るかについて大きな騒ぎは起こしません。アメリカ人は理想としての平等を強力に信じているのです。高い地位にいる人は出来るだけ目立たないようにすることを期待されるのです。彼の周りの人たちもまた、彼を過度にちやほやしないものと思われています。「平凡な人」に親切である影響力のある人が尊敬されるのです。
和訳お願いします!!

One of nature's...wonders is indeed the power of the newly born, with no experience at all, to find their way about and protect themselves in the outside world, guided by ... instincts which show themselves at certain periods. Maria montessori　さんの言葉らしいのですが、翻訳サイトだとどうしても変な文になってしまうのでよろしくお願いします＞＜

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

お礼 2011/07/03 14:25

関連するQ&A

英文の長文、和訳お願いします

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

この英文はどのように訳せば良いのでしょう？

英文の和訳をお願いします。

次の英文の訳についておしえてください

和訳をお願いします

和訳してください。

Which is more importantの後に「monument」が省略

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

次の英文を和訳してください。

何故、この和訳になるのか

和訳に困ってます＞＜宜しくお願いします＞＜

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

次の英文を和訳してください。

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

この英文の和訳をお願いできないでしょうか？

和訳お願いします

英文和訳があります。和訳は正しいですか？

和訳お願いします!!

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ
一覧

専門家に質問してみよう
専門家登録

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVE セレクト

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

お礼 2011/07/03 14:25

関連するQ&A

英文の長文、和訳お願いします

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

この英文はどのように訳せば良いのでしょう？

英文の和訳をお願いします。

次の英文の訳についておしえてください

和訳をお願いします

和訳してください。

Which is more importantの後に「monument」が省略

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

次の英文を和訳してください。

何故、この和訳になるのか

和訳に困ってます＞＜宜しくお願いします＞＜

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

次の英文を和訳してください。

次の英文を和訳してほしいです。

この英文の和訳をお願いできないでしょうか？

和訳お願いします

英文和訳があります。和訳は正しいですか？

和訳お願いします!!

注目のQ&A

カテゴリ 一覧

専門家に質問してみよう 専門家登録

あなたにピッタリな商品が見つかる！ OKWAVE セレクト

カテゴリ
一覧

専門家に質問してみよう
専門家登録