Jamie's Program: The Recipe for Success and Great Cooking
- Jamie is a serious young man who has created a fun and educational program. He trains disadvantaged youngsters to be professional chefs and has won awards for his work in promoting healthy eating.
- Jamie's program teaches valuable skills that many young people don't learn at home, such as how to shop well and choose healthy foods. His philosophy, reflected in the title of his program 'The Naked Chef', emphasizes the value of preparing simple and healthy meals.
- In a world where fast food is popular among young people, Jamie encourages creativity in the kitchen and the joy of sharing good food with family and friends. His success is testament to the power of his program and his passion for great cooking.
- ベストアンサー
この英文訳してください。。。
この英文訳してください。。。 文が難しくて訳せません。 わかるかた教えてください Jamie `s program is fun, but he is a serious young man. For example, he has trained disadvantaged young ?sters to be professional chefs. Also he was won awards for helping children to learn about healthy eating. His program teaches skills which many young people don`t learn at home anymore-how to shop well, or how to choose fruit and vegetables. Jamie`s philosophy can be found in the title of his program. The naked chef. It shows that he values preparing simple, healthy food. Today many young people eat fast food. But Jamie`s is telling us to be creative with the things that we find in our kitchen. He also reminds us of the pleasure of sharing good food with family and friends. This is the recipe for his success, and for great cooking お願いいたします
- 英語
- 回答数1
- ありがとう数4
- みんなの回答 （1）
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
Jamie `s program is fun, but he is a serious young man. ジャミーのプログラムは面白い。しかし、彼はまじめな若者である。 For example, he has trained disadvantaged young ?sters to be professional chefs. たとえば、彼は障害を持つ若い [?sters (文字化けのため不明)] を訓練してプロのシェフに育ててきた。 Also he was won awards for helping children to learn about healthy eating. また、子どもたちに食育を教えて、そのことで賞を受けたこともある。 His program teaches skills which many young people don`t learn at home anymore-how to shop well, or how to choose fruit and vegetables. 彼のプログラムというのは、今は家庭できちんと教えられていない技術、つまり果物や野菜を（正しく）選ぶことを、多くの子どもたちに教えるものです。 Jamie`s philosophy can be found in the title of his program. ジャミーの考え方は、彼のプログラムのタイトルを見ると分かります。 The naked chef. 裸のシェフ。 It shows that he values preparing simple, healthy food. それはつまり、簡単でヘルシーな食事が大事だということです。 Today many young people eat fast food. 今日では、子どもがファースト・フードを食べます。 But Jamie`s is telling us to be creative with the things that we find in our kitchen. しかしジャミーは、わたしたちのキッチンにある食材を使ってクリエーティブな料理を作るようにと勧めてくれます。 He also reminds us of the pleasure of sharing good food with family and friends. また、良い食事を家族や友人とともにすることの喜びを思い出させてくれます。 This is the recipe for his success, and for great cooking そして、これが彼の成功の、また良い調理のレシピでもあるのです。
関連するQ&A
- 英文和訳
And should we defeat every enemy, and should we double our wealth and conquer the stars, and still be unequal to this issue, then we will have failed as a people and as a nation. For, with a country as with a person, "what is a man profited if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?" There is no Negro problem. There is no Southern problem. There is no Northern problem. There is only an American problem.This was the first nation in the history of the world to be founded with a purpose. The great phrases of that purpose still sound in every American heart, North and South: "All men are created equal." "Government by consent of the governed." "Give me liberty or give me death." And those are not just clever words, and those are not just empty theories. In their name Americans have fought and died for two centuries and tonight around the world they stand there as guardians of our liberty risking their lives. Those words are promised to every citizen that he shall share in the dignity of man. This dignity cannot be found in a man's possessions. It cannot be found in his power or in his position. It really rests on his right to be treated as a man equal in opportunity to all others. It says that he shall share in freedom. He shall choose his leaders, educate his children, provide for his family according to his ability and his merits as a human being. To apply any other test, to deny a man his hopes because of his color or race or his religion or the place of his birth is not only to do injustice, it is to deny Americans and to dishonor the dead who gave their lives for American freedom. どなたかお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文を日本語に訳し、（）に入るものを選んでください
So, why is this story so important to Americans? First of all, the story is about the challenge and excitement of a child disobeying a parent`s command, and destroying something treasured by that parent. Moreover, this act of youthful rebellion is committed by George Washington, the "Father of His Country." In this sense, the act is a symbolic one. The child disobeying and defying his father can be seen to represent the young America breaking with the older authority of Europe and, in particular, the English King. The second reason that this story is important to Americans reflects another symbolic meaning of cutting down a tree: the act of civilizing the wilderness. On their arrival in the New York, the trees had to be cut, the great forests leveled, in order to make civilized land out of the wilderness: to clear the land for planting crops; to build cabins; to get fuel for warmth and cooking; and to make fences for protection. Thus the tree-cutting hatchet is the essential tool for ( 1 ). Lastly, while the story of George Washington describes the act of a young revolutionary, it is significant to Americans that this act is done innocently and honestly. "Run to my arms, you dearest boy," cries his father, and with this sign of love the Revolution is given the approval of the parent. In this way, the story fulfills the wish of every rebellious child: that the gesture of independence will be respected, and that the child will be able to enjoy its act of rebellion without losing ( 2 ). ・（１）に入る３語の語句を同じ段階から抜き出してください。 ・（２）に入る適切なものを選んでください。 (1)its father`s love (2)its social relationships (3)its independence (4)its pride
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文でわからないところがあります。
下記の文章の” I imagine he’s had his share of what they can do back there, too” の部分をどう訳せばいいのか教えていただけないでしょうか。 “He was always well-mannered and always a nice boy and very polite and kind, and I always remember him for that and always liked him, too. I felt quite disturbed that this would be happening. War is an awful thing, so I imagine he’s had his share of what they can do back there, too, in Afghanistan. I imagine he’s seen a lot, too, that’s maybe done things to him,” said Mattheis. 出展：VOA News http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa/US-Soldier-Sentenced-to-Life-in-Prison-for-Afghan-Atrocities-133719403.html
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の翻訳
以下の翻訳をお願いします One who travels hopefully in life knows where he wants to be and what he wants to do, but quite never arrives. Yet the pursuit of things may bring him more pleasure than would the victory. He will enjoy a wide experience of life, the highs and the lows, the wealth and the poverty, life riches tapestry of experience but he has not realized that it is the journey for him that counts, not the success or failure at the end of it. He is free with his gains, and can be lavish and prodigal, can throw himself totally into everything he becomes involved He is not extreme so much as whole hearted in things, he has no moderation. He is irascible, yet kind. He gives advice and wisdom and the benefit of his experience to those who are more expert or aught to know better than him. He has a kind of shrewd cleverness, A good judge of things as they are. And an intuitive knowledge of how to manipulate things to his own advantage in life.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の訳をお願いします
以下の文章を訳していただけますか。お願いします。 He deeply desires, a true friend, someone whom he can express his feelings and thoughts to. People and relationships are important to him despite his independent exterior. He is interested in the lives and affairs of those close to him. He is an excellent arbitrator, negotiator and peace maker and meddler in other peoples problems. But not soft B, he is as forceful as he feels is necessary for achieving his own aims and ambitions, and if he feels others are not appreciative of what he is trying to do, then he will consider them unworthy of his time and efforts and he will take back what ever efforts he has made on their behalf, or whatever he has given then, When he gives to people it is not free, even if it just advice, it comes on loan. And at some point the loan is recalled. The favour owed is collected like a debt by him.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の和訳
英文を和訳していただけるかた のみで、お願いできますでしょうか？ １段落の前半部分です。 よろしくお願いいたします。 His voice is a stirring voice; strong lilting emotional and compelling. Tending to be fairly high pitched. The kind of reverent voice that could stir a crowd, or move the masses, if he was inclined to speak publicly. When he speaks it is the voice a person who wants to be more important than he actually is, Loud, Animated full of feeling fanatical, forceful. For there is some momentum and something able to stir others feelings up in his voice. He speaks quickly when he starts with no hesitations or stumbling. But some irregular breathing in conversation between words I would describe his voice as sharp. and energetic, full of a wavering resonance and power.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文を日本語に訳してくださいm(_ _)m
"How much longer is America going to continue to support, condone, endorse and finance the king of all the Sunni kingdom that is Saudi Arabia while simultaneously confronting the Sunni terrorist group that is ISIS? The one thing that you have to respect about Vladimir Putin is he's consistent; he knows who his enemy is and he's going to kill them. Sunni terrorists are the enemy of Russia, of the Syrian government, of the Iranian government. When it comes to America, I don't know who the enemy is! Are we for the Sunnis, which we finance and arm in Saudi Arabia or are we against the Sunnis, which we claim to be fighting with ISIS in Syria? America needs to create clarity for itself, and for our voters and for our military as to how we are going to deal with Saudi Arabia, which inherently makes America a Middle Eastern hypocrite on a level that can no longer can be sustained." where is the logic
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文
以下の英文の翻訳お願いできませんか？ (1)Jerrod Hamilton is an active 7-year-old boy. Shortly before his seventh birthday, he had a small seizure. When he was out playing with his dad and his dog, his right arm twitched a ittle.In the following days, he had another couple of seizures. During those seizures, he stared blankly, and for a minute or two could not respond to his parents. (2)Jerrod's parents took him to their pediatrician, Dr.Madeline Sierra. "I'd like to order several tests including an EEG and MRI scan. These tests are painless and noninvasive.Starting today,I also suggest that you keep record of Jerrod's illness. Include his symptoms, tests, information from doctors, any treatments or therapies. Document everything. I will help you, but ultimately, you and Jerrod are the ones who will have to make the decisions." Jerrod's tests were done right away. (3)Jerrod's symptoms were escalating. He had daily seizures,and they included disorientation as well as uncontrollable repetitive movements on the right side of his body. He often felt tired and weak after the seizures. Dr. Serra said," There isnothing to indicate a brain tumor.I am more confident that we are dealing with a form of epilepsy, which is probably very treatable. However, given the rapid change in Jerrod's symptoms, I would like to refer you to a specialist in neurological disorders." (4)Dr.Sierra's referral sent Jerrod and his parents to Dr.Benjamin Singh,a neurologist who specialized in seizure disorders.He said, "Based on these tests and some other indications, I believe Jerrod's seizures are what we call' partial' seizures. This means that they only involve part of the brain. Let's start with a seizure medication." (5)Dr. Singh prescribed medication to help treat Jerrod's disorder. The first medication did not succeed. Doctors tried another. After some time and other combinations of medications, it became clear that this type of treatment would not work well. (6)As Jerrod's brain is starting to be damaged by the seizures, Dr. Singh went on to describe another type of more drastic treatment. "The upper part of the brain, the cerebrum is divided into two hemispheres. In Jerrod's case, his seizure activity is located primarily in the left hemisphere of his brain. Sometimes, we can control seizure activity by removing the portion of the brain which is suffering. It can lead to a signifcantly better quality of life for the patient. This may be our best option."
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文について教えてください。
Moreover-taking the word "tragedy" in its most ordinary modern sense-it is Gretchen who suffers the tragedy, which Faust takes in his stride. We never see him hunted by the furies, like Orestes: no sooner has Part Two begun than spirits "remove the burning arrows of remorse, and cleanse his mind of memories." And though he dies blind like Oedipus, (1)【he does not blind himself with clasps plucked in a passion from the corpse of his beloved, resolved to live in infamy and night.】 Rather, he loses his sight when he is a hundred years old, just before he dies in a moment of elation. Faust's sufferings are incidental. He is not a tragic hero like Orestes, who is called upon to kill his mother, or like Oedipus, who owes it to his city to find out who killed his predecessor and who thus discovers that he killed his father and is wedded to his mother. In Faust, tragedy engulfs not the hero but representatives of unheroic, non-outstanding, suffering humanity: Gretchen, Philemon and Baucis, Gretchen's mother. The death of Philemon and Baucis in the fifth act of Part Two involves no tragic conflict in Faust's mind: he has given different instructions; their death is a hideous surprise to him; but again he takes it in his stride.(2)【 It is another episode, no more.】(3)【 In retrospect we realize, if it was not clear to us all along, that Gretchen's tragedy, too, was a mere episode.】 The drama is epic, the effect cumulative. 『Goethe's Faust by Walter Kaufmann』 上記の英文の(1)【】、(2)【】、(3)【】の部分について質問です。 (1)【he does not blind himself with clasps plucked in a passion from the corpse of his beloved, resolved to live in infamy and night.】 ＊clasps pluckedとはどういう意味にとればよいのでしょうか？ ＊全体はどういう訳になりますか？ (2)【 It is another episode, no more.】 ＊これはどういうことを言っているのでしょうか？ another episodeとは？ (3)【 In retrospect we realize, if it was not clear to us all along, that Gretchen's tragedy, too, was a mere episode.】 ＊文の構造がよくわかりません。 if節があって、帰結はGretchen's tragedy, too, was a mere episodeだと思うのですが、Gretchen's tragedyの前にthatがついているのがわかりません。 ＊また、it was not clear to us all alongのitは何をさしているのでしょうか？ よろしくお願いいたします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文!
英文の和訳をよろしくお願いします! But he did not have enough resources to realize his dream:money, navigation skill, and command of English. For five years, he worked hard to prepare for his trip. He practiced sailing a yacht, read many books and manuals, and learned English. At the age of 23, he finally left Japan in a small yacht.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
