• ベストアンサー
※ ChatGPTを利用し、要約された質問です(原文:よろしくお願いします)

Social Phobia: The Fear of Being Judged

このQ&Aのポイント
  • Social phobia is a condition characterized by an irrational fear of being judged negatively by others.
  • People with social phobia believe that they will embarrass themselves or be criticized by others in social situations.
  • Avoiding social activities only reinforces their fear, leading to a loss of confidence in their social skills.

質問者が選んだベストアンサー

  • ベストアンサー
  • cbm51901
  • ベストアンサー率67% (2671/3943)
回答No.2

> 「心得ていない」だとthey don't even know how.となりませんか? ⇒ 仰ることはわかります。その部分の解釈に私も苦労したのですが、 "becomes less and less confident" で「自信をどんどん失っていく」です。 では、何に対する自信を失うのかというと、「彼らが(周りの人と交流する)術をも心得ている = "they even know how" 」ことに対する自信です。ですので、 ” ~ becomes less and less confident that they even know how." は本来、 「自分は交流の仕方を心得ている、という自信が、どんどん崩れ落ちていく。」 と訳すべきであったかも知れません。そこを私は見方を変えて、 「自分は交流の仕方さえ心得ていないのだ、と、どんどん自信を失っていく。」 としたのです。

corta
質問者

お礼

納得しました。ご回答ありがとうございます

全文を見る
すると、全ての回答が全文表示されます。

その他の回答 (2)

  • Nakay702
  • ベストアンサー率80% (9713/12080)
回答No.3

>A person who seldom engages with others becomes less and less confident that they even know how.のthatは何にかかっているのでしょうか?訳も教えてください。 →confidentとthatの間にof が脱落しているように思います。 このthatは名詞節を導く接続詞で、その名詞節は前置詞ofの目的語になる構造のはずですから。 ⇒A person who seldom engages with others becomes less and less confident of that they even know how. 「他人とめったに交際しない人は、どうすればよいか分かっていることについてさえ自信をなくしていきます」。

corta
質問者

お礼

ご回答ありがとうございます

全文を見る
すると、全ての回答が全文表示されます。
  • cbm51901
  • ベストアンサー率67% (2671/3943)
回答No.1

"A person who seldom engages with others becomes less and less confident that they even know how." 「周りの人とめったに交流しようとしない人は、自分は交流の仕方さえ心得ていないのだ、と、どんどん自信を失っていく。」 "that" の部分ですが、抽出すると、"A person becomes less and less confident that they know how." となります。つまり、[A person becomes less and less coonfident] と [they know how.] を繋ぐ接続詞と捉えてよいのではないでしょうか。

corta
質問者

お礼

ご回答ありがとうございます。cbm51901さんの訳の「心得ていない」だとthey don't even know how.となりませんか?

全文を見る
すると、全ての回答が全文表示されます。

関連するQ&A

  • 英作文添削おねがいします

    大学受験浪人生のものです よろしければ添削お願いいたします<m(__)m> 設問 Some people argue that personal relationships have improved because of new technologies, and others argue that they have weakened What do you think about this? Write a paragraph defending ONE of these positions, giving at least one appropriate reason to support your answer. 自分の解答 I think that personal relationships have weakened because of new technologies. This is because, more and more new technologies such as the Internet are prevailed, the less time people spend communicating with other people face to face. よろしくお願いします

  • 英訳お願いいたします

    自分の答と照らし合わせたいのでご解答お願いします。 (1)The social science disciplines such as sociology, anthropology and history have been developed to explain puzzling social phenomena. They particularly investigate "collective" phenomena, that is, aspects of people's lives that are not unique to them, ones that they share with at least some others. that is以下のto them, ones, they shareのtheyが指しているものがわかりません。 (2)Being able to give answers to questions such as "Why do these people typically or regularly do that?" or "Why did that event or kind of event happen when and where it did?" is a practical requirement of life for everyone. (3)Effective human beings must have a practical, sound grasp of the concepts needed to analyse social reality, concepts which social theory makes explicit for the social sciences. (4)The key point is that realists hold that there are many different kinds of causes at work producing social phenomena. Thus realism provides a good basis for introducing the varieties of social theory which seek to understand the causes of social phenomena.

  • 英作文の問題です よろしければ添削お願い致します

    (簡単なご指摘で大助かりです) - テキストの正解: Many people say that through using PCs they often forget Chinese characters they once knew: they have less occasion to write by hand. ※パソコンを使うようになって字を書く機会が減り、漢字を忘れやすくなったと言う人が多い。 私の文: Many people come to use the PCs and seldom write character practically, so they often say that they easily forget kanji. よろしくお願いいたします。

  • 日本語訳を教えて下さい。

    この英文の訳を教えて下さい。 Responders who reject small offers show that even when dealing with a complete stranger, they would rather punish unfairness than gain money. Why would people act in ways that seem contrary to their own interest? The most reasonable answer is that moral intuitions like fairness developed because they improved the reproductive fitness of those who had them and the groups to which they belonged. Among social animals, those who form cooperative relationships tend to do much better than those who do not. By making a fair offer, you signal that you are the kind of person who would make a good partner for cooperating. On the other hand, by rejecting an unfair offer, you show that you are not going to put up with being treated unfairly, and thus you discourage others from trying to take advantage of you. There are also social advantages to such intuitions. A society in which most people act fairly will generally do better than one in which everyone is always seeking to take unfair advantage, because people will be better able to trust each other and form cooperative relationships.

  • 次の文の意味がよくわかりません

    Hatred and anger, grief and despair, love and joy are pairs of emotions that consist of the same core feeling and are distinguishable from each other only in terms of the social conditions that cause them and the behavior they in turn cause. from 以下の中のand the behavior they in turn causeがよくわかりませんでした。どちらもcauseしているのですか? theyはなにをさして何をcauseするのでしょうか...

  • 下記の英文を訳してくださる方はいませんか?

    Regarding the question of whether death is a life crisis, one noted authority concluded that it is not invariably a crisis for an individual person. “There are people among us who seldom give thought to death. Some of these people come to death before death has come to mind-accidents, foul play, sudden traumas of various kinds. A crisis was neither anticipated nor experienced in such instances. Others among us do think of death, but minus the doomsday visions. There are people who seem to view personal annihilation with equanimity, and others who are serene because, for them, death does not represent annihilation. Still others feel sorely troubled with the life they are experiencing, and death is seen as the solution rather than the problem” (Kastenbaum, 1975, p. 48). お願いします。

  • 言い方

    they are always fighting each other they are always fighting with each other withは~を味方にして戦うと言う意味もありますがそれを抜いてこの二つの文はニュアンス的に少し意味に違いはありますか? 後 Is there any way to stop that? ここでのthatはitと置き換え可能ですよね?? thatとitの使い分けも教えてほしいです(T_T)今までしっかり理解せずに使ってました(>_<)

  • 和訳困っています><

    This rather gloomy process is known as disengagement, based on the idea that there is an innate, biological tendency to disengage from society with age, rather like an animal creeping off to die by itself. It reflects a tendency of psychologists at that time to look for biological explanations for all human behavior. But there are many problems with this model. For one thing, the relative lack of social involvement of older people isn't anything like an animal creeping away to die, because the period of being 'an old person' or a pensioner is so very long. Nowadays, it isn't uncommon for people to live for 30 years or more after they have retired, and that's quite different from a couple of days of being ill and weak before dying-the normal state of affairs among wild animals. Activity theory That type of explanation also ignores the social factors involved in retirement. An alternative explanation for why older people don't seem to take as active a part in society as they might was put forward by Havinghurst, in 1964. Having hurst attributed it to the fact that older people have relatively few opportunities to play meaningful social roles in society. When someone is active and working, they play a large number of different social roles. These include various roles at work as well as roles to do with the family. In other words, as Hvinghurst put it, their role-count is high. But when someone retires from work, their role-count drops dramatically, because all the social roles that they played that were relevant to work -even ones as simple as being a commuter- vanish. All that is left are social roles to do with family and home. In other words, Havinghurst was arguing, people becomes less visible when they retire simply because they don't have as many opportunities to play a part in everyday social living. And this has personal consequences, as well as social ones, because people can easily come to feel apathetic and useless as a result. The way to counteract this, Havinghurst argued, is for people to replace their lost social roles deliberately, by adding new ones such as joining clubs and societies for older people, or working for organizations like Oxfam, which employ people over conventional retirement age. keeping up one's role-count, according to Havinghurst, is the way to ensure a positive experience of old age.

  • 和訳困っています><

    SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY In 1975, Dowd proposed a different way of explaining this question. Dowd proposed that retirement is actually a sort of social contract that the person makes with society.They obtain increased leisure time, and an 'honourable discharge' from the idea that all responsible members of society ought to work as hard as possible - the Protestant Work Ethic-and in return, they give up their involvement in how society's affairs are run. This social exchange is seen, according to Dowd, as a fair trade, both by society and by old people. More recently, however, people are showing sings of being less prepared to accept this type of social contract. After all, we live much longer now than we did when retirement was first introdused, and we keep our health for longer, too; so it is much more practical for people to continue to take an active part in society. Among business and professional people, it is not at all uncommon for retirement to signal the beginning of a second career, and a much more independent one that allows them to use their experience, such as working as a consultant. In other groups of society, too, people are beginning to see retirement as an opportunity to do new things. Organizations like the University of the Third Age encourage retired people to develop new hobbies and pursue new interests, and are becoming more popular and successful all the time. Many psychologists now take the view that successful retirement is all about making sure that you acquire new social roles, to replace the ones that you have lost through work, and activities of this sort are exactly the way that people do that. Insight Having responsibilities and being needed seem to be the core of successful retirement. That can take many forms: some people feel needed by their gardens, and devote much of their time to taking care of them; while others take on more social responsibilities.

  • 下記の英文を訳してくださる方はいませんか?

    Disengagement As people get older, they tend to withdraw gradually from society, and at the same time society tends to withdraw from them. This progressive, mutual withdrawal is called disengagement. Because of disengagement, old people are less interested in having social contacts, and have fewer social contacts, with less emotional involvement in them. Viewed positively, disengagement permits the old person to enjoy a more leisurely way of life, but working against this positive aspect of disengagement is the work ethic that requires activity, including social activity to maintain a sense of self-worth (Kalish, 1975). お願いします。

このQ&Aのポイント
  • EP-882ARのメンテナンスボックスの交換方法についてご教示ください。
  • EP-882ARのメンテナンスボックスを交換する手順を教えてください。
  • EP-882ARのメンテナンスボックスの交換方法を教えてください。
回答を見る