- ベストアンサー
訳してください。
下にある英語の部分を訳してください。日本語は自分なりに訳したんですが…他がわかりません。教えて下さい。 スウェーデンの美しい町のベクショーは森に囲まれています。冬はとても寒く家の中は集中暖房が必要です。ベクショーの人々は木を燃料として浪費してます。彼らは森をまわってそれをえることができます。(1)Waste wood is sent to a big power plant.(2)there it is burned to get electricity.(3)The surplus heat is used to heat water.(4)Then the hot water is sent to each home through pipes.(5)Waste wood is one kind of ‘‘biomss.''(6)Biomass is an impoetant source of energy.ベクシーの人々はそれを最大限に利用する方法を知っています。
- kiyona3
- お礼率14% (16/113)
- 英語
- 回答数2
- ありがとう数1
- みんなの回答 （2）
- 専門家の回答
質問者が選んだベストアンサー
★スウェーデンとベクショー、それにバイオマスをキーワードにGoogleしてみてください。 下記ＵＲＬはそのうちのひとつです。 ★ベクショー市が、脱化石燃料、脱原子力のためのバイオマスエネルギー利用の先進地であることがわかりますね。 ★そのような背景知識があると、あなたの訳文のうち、「木を浪費」はおかしいですね。 ★訳すというのは、単語を置き換えていくことではありません。その文が全体として何を表現しているかを理解すれば、日本語訳は自然に出てきます。 waste woodは、廃材とも理解できますが、ここでは薪、たきぎのことでしょうね。 ★この程度のヒントで再挑戦してみてください。
その他の回答 (1)
- play_play
- ベストアンサー率16% (1/6)
http://honyaku.yahoo.co.jp/ こちらはどうでしょうか。 日本語→英語・英語→日本語のほか、韓国、中国にも対応しています。ぜひ使用してみては？
- 参考URL：
- http://honyaku.yahoo.co.jp/
関連するQ&A
- 和訳が分かりません。
And the reason is, in the stationary power plant, you can afford to have something that weighs a lot more, is voluminous, and you can take the waste heat and run a steam turbine and generate a secondary power source. something that wightってどうやって訳せばいいのでしょうか？ お願いいたします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 廃水処理の有害物質
論文を訳していての疑問です、 Occurrence of toxic compounds in the influent to a wastewater treatment plant with nitrogen removal may disturb the process tremendously. 廃水処理場に流れ込む有害な化合物の存在は、窒素除去プロセスを非常に妨害する。 Nitrification inhibition tests act as an important tool in the efforts of isolating sources of toxic compounds. 硝化阻害試験は、有害な化合物の源を分離する試みとして重要な手段である。 However, it is necessary to evaluate the test methods and to know the importance of variable parameters. だが、試験方法を評価することと、可変パラメータの重要性を知っていることが重要である。 We set up a complete factorial experiment for 6 different types of waste water, 3 concentration levels of waste water and three different sludges. 私達は、６種類の排水における完全な要因分析を行った。排水の３種の濃度レベル、そして３種の沈殿物について。 Statistical treatment of the results showed that the percentage inhibition of nitrification was significantly depending on the type of waste water, on the effect of the waste water is related to the type of compound or waste water that usually occurs in the sludge. 結果の取り扱いにより、硝化の重量百分率阻害が排水の形態にかなり依存していることが示され、排水の効果は化合物、または汚泥に存在する排水形態と関連する。 ここで言う、『有害物質』とは何で、なぜ窒素除去(硝化・脱窒)が阻害されるのですか？ 冒頭部分しか訳していないので・・・。
- ベストアンサー
- 生物学
- 英語の問題なのですが多分理科がわかりません。
こんばんは。 いつもありがとうございます。 これは、英語の問題集の中の文なのですが、多分理科のせいで理解できないような感じなのでこちらで質問させていただきました。 Different materials conduct heat differently. A frying pan with an iron handle soon gets too hot to be touched. This is because iron allows heat to pass through it very quickly. We prefer our frying pans to have wooden handles since wood is a poor heat conductor. このあと位から特にわからないので教えていただけますか？ Similarly,air does not conduct heat as well as water. We would find a room of 22℃ quite comfortable even if we wore just a swimsuit,while bath water of the same temperature is unpleasantly cool. これで本文はおわりです。 問題はHere,conduct means（to allow something to travel along through oneself). でかっこのなかにいれるものは一応正解は選べたのですがあんまりよくわかりませんでした。 一番わからないのは本文の後半でつぎは問題文のかっこのなかです。 よかったら教えてください。 よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 科学
- 次の英文の意味と文法解釈をお願いします。
Currently the waste liquids can be sent to A rather that B, it is the reason of this anticipation. (1)この文章の意味を教えてください。 自分は、「現在、廃液はBではなくＡに送られる、これは期待から行っているものである」と理解しましたが、なんとも自信がありません。 (2)この文章中のratherの使い方は正しいのでしょうか？ 宜しくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英文の質問
英文についていくつか質問させて頂きます。 This means that the inhibition is a function of the type of waste water, the combination of waste water and sludge, the concentration of the waste water and a background variation. これは、阻害が排水の種類、相互作用、排水濃度、BG変化の組み合わせであることを示す。 （4つの要素の組み合わせですか） However, the results from these experiment indicate that it may after all not be possible. しかし、これらの実験からの結果は、起こり得ないすべての後にそれができることを示す。 （that以下の訳が判りません）
- ベストアンサー
- 化学
- #Nuclear Wastewater What
#Nuclear Wastewater What is the discharge of the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan this time? It is heavily polluted nuclear wastewater. What is nuclear wastewater? Simply put, nuclear wastewater is water used for cooling nuclear reactors in nuclear power plants. This water also contains radioactive isotopes, but the content is low and the half-life is short. It can be discharged after being treated up to the standard. The coolant that normally touches the nuclear fuel rods has been recycled in the nuclear reactor. Japan’s discharge of nuclear contaminated water this time is because the reactors of the Fukushima nuclear power plant were damaged before, and a large amount of cooling water in the nuclear reactors flowed out to pollute the cooling water outside. This nuclear wastewater contains a large number of radioactive elements with strong radioactivity and a very long half-life. , Random discharge will have an impact on the entire earth's ecology.
- 締切済み
- インディーズ
- 和訳
和訳で良く分からなかった箇所を挙げました。 1How dull this would be if there were no colors at all, or all things were different shades of same color! 2People of the world don't have enough to eat to avoid malnutrition. Yet a former Secretary of Agriculture has said that if we used the best methods of agriculture on the land currently being farmed, the world could feed itself. 3Air doesn't conduct heat as well as water. We would find a room of 22℃ quite comfortable even if we wore just a swimsuit, while bath water of the same temperature is unpleasantly cool. The water takes heat from our warm body much more quickly than the air does.
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- 英語の翻訳をお願いいたしますm(__)m
Water is our most important natural resource. Yet though water covers most of the Earth, only 2.5% of it is salt-free. Demand for fresh water has risen sharply in the last 50 years, and it is still going up. That’s already causing serious problems. Finding the right solutions may be one of the biggest challenges of our time. There are several reasons behind the growing crisis. The first is waste. About 70% of our fresh water is used to grow crops. It takes 1,000 tons of water to grow just one ton of wheat. Unfortunately, around 60% of that water is wasted. Better irrigation methods would help the situation. Pollution is another big problem. Many of the world’s great rivers, such as the Ganges in India, are badly polluted. Yet 350 million people rely on the Ganges. Their health is affected by the health of the river. Steps are being taken to clean up some waterways, but it is expensive and can take years. Overuse also puts pressure on water supplies. In the USA, 95% of the country’s fresh water comes from underground sources. With so much water being used to grow crops and raise livestock, water levels are dropping rapidly. Once used, those supplies are gone forever, since they are not refilled by rainwater. The key there is to lower demand. In many places around the world, people already live in crisis. More than one billion people have no access to clean water. That leads to millions of deaths every year, including thousands of children dying every day in Africa. By 2025, as many as 25 African countries may face severe water shortages. The situation could even lead to wars over water rights. The fresh water crisis is not limited to poor regions. Indeed, rich and poor countries from Asia to Europe to North America are facing shortages. It’s a growing problem that could soon affect us all.
- 締切済み
- 英語
- 英語の文章を和訳して下さい。
In the official report on the operations issued by the Government of India much stress was laid on "the intense heat, sand, and shortage of water", and "[t]he desertion of the camel-drivers and the severe climatic conditions so delayed and distressed the main body as to necessitate a withdrawal from Lahij". McKenzie notes that "we do not seem to have made such arrangements for transport and for water supply as would have prepared us for the difficulties which every experienced traveller knew we would have to face. . . But the severe heat of the climate, the potential treachery of hired Arabs, and the shortage of water were all of them factors which had been familiar from the beginning to the Indian authorities, and, one might suppose, ought to have been allowed for."
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
- どこが間違いなのか指摘してもらえますか？
正直質問のタイトルが曖昧で分かりにくくてすみません。 次のような文章で選択肢があるのですが ｛１｝ どうして3ではなく４が「正しい」のですか？ ｛２｝この程度の文で読み間違えてるのは何が足りないと思いますか？品詞分解で読むことは怠っていないと思います。正直申し上げてもらってけっこうです。 Optimism is a good characteristic, but if carried to excess it becomes foolishness. We are prone to speak of the resorces of this country as inexhaustible; this is not so. The mineral wealth of the country, the coal. iron, oil, gas, and the like,does not reproduce itself and therefore is certain to be exhausted ultimately; and wastefulness today means that our decendants will feel the effects a generation or two before they otherwise would（wouldのあとには何が省略されているのか。）. But there are certain other forms of waste which could be entirely stopped---the waste of soil by erosion, for instance, which is one of the worst examples of waste today in the united states, is easily preventable, so that the current enormous loss of fertile soil is entirely unnecessary. (1) According to the passage, in what ways may waste be categorized? 1 Into recycled and unrecycled by-products of mineral production 2 Into animal, vegetable, and mineral products. 3 Into fertile and infertile eroded soil. 4 Into preventable and unpreventable exhausion of natural resources. 他の問いは大丈夫です。一番の問題だけを質問させていただきます。よろしくお願いします。
- ベストアンサー
- 英語
